Guiding treatment decisions in renal cell carcinoma: the role of biomarkers and clinical factors.
Journal
Current opinion in urology
ISSN: 1473-6586
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Urol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9200621
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Oct 2024
22 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline:
22
10
2024
pubmed:
22
10
2024
entrez:
22
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), significantly improving overall survival and achieving durable responses. This review is timely due to the increasing number of ICI-based regimens now considered standard care for RCC. There is an urgent need to identify reliable biomarkers that can predict therapeutic responses and resistance, a key challenge in current research. While tumor-specific factors such as pathological characteristics, genomic mutations, and transcriptional profiles have been extensively studied, no definitive predictive biomarker has yet emerged. Additionally, advanced technologies are being explored to address tumor heterogeneity. Recent research has focused on novel areas such as the microbiome, radiomics, and spatial transcriptomics, which show promise as potential biomarkers. The translation of these emerging biomarker findings into clinical practice is essential to improving personalized treatment strategies for RCC. Until reliable biomarkers are clinically available, clinical factors may play a pivotal role in guiding individualized treatment decisions to optimize patient outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39434633
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001235
pii: 00042307-990000000-00199
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Motzer RJ, Tannir NM, McDermott DF, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2018; 378:1277–1290.
Choueiri TK, Powles T, Burotto M, et al. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2021; 384:829–841.
Motzer R, Alekseev B, Rha S-Y, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or everolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2021; 384:1289–1300.
Tannir NM, Albigès L, McDermott DF, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended 8-year follow-up results of efficacy and safety from the phase III CheckMate 214 trial. Ann Oncol 2024; S0923-7534:01516-3.
Motzer RJ, McDermott DF, Escudier B, et al. Conditional survival and long-term efficacy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 2022; 128:2085–2097.
Powles T, Burotto M, Escudier B, et al. Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended follow-up from the phase III randomised CheckMate 9ER trial. ESMO open 2024; 9:102994.
Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V, et al. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2019; 380:1116–1127.
Motzer RJ, Porta C, Eto M, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib in first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: final prespecified overall survival analysis of CLEAR, a phase III study. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1222–1228.
Plimack ER, Powles T, Stus V, et al. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: 43-month follow-up of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 study. Eur Urol 2023; 84:449–454.
Festino L, Botti G, Lorigan P, et al. Cancer treatment with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents: Is PD-L1 expression a biomarker for patient selection? Drugs 2016; 76:925–945.
Pignon J-C, Jegede O, Shukla SA, et al. irRECIST for the evaluation of candidate biomarkers of response to nivolumab in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: analysis of a phase II prospective clinical trial. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:2174–2184.
Braun DA, Ishii Y, Walsh AM, et al. Clinical validation of PBRM1 alterations as a marker of immune checkpoint inhibitor response in renal cell carcinoma. JAMA Oncol 2019; 5:1631–1633.
Miao D, Margolis CA, Gao W, et al. Genomic correlates of response to immune checkpoint therapies in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Science 2018; 359:801–806.
McGranahan N, Furness AJS, Rosenthal R, et al. Clonal neoantigens elicit T cell immunoreactivity and sensitivity to immune checkpoint blockade. Science 2016; 351:1463–1469.
Motzer RJ, Robbins PB, Powles T, et al. Avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: biomarker analysis of the phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 trial. Nat Med 2020; 26:1733–1741.
Motzer RJ, Choueiri TK, McDermott DF, et al. Biomarker analysis from CheckMate 214: nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma. J Immunother cancer 2022; 10:e004316.
Trpkov K, Hes O, Williamson SR, et al. New developments in existing WHO entities and evolving molecular concepts: the Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia. Mod Pathol 2021; 34:1392–1424.
Bakouny Z, Braun DA, Shukla SA, et al. Integrative molecular characterization of sarcomatoid and rhabdoid renal cell carcinoma. Nat Commun 2021; 12:808.
Tannir NM, Signoretti S, Choueiri TK, et al. Efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in first-line treatment of patients with advanced sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:78–86.
Rini BI, Signoretti S, Choueiri TK, et al. Long-term outcomes with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in first-line treatment of patients with advanced sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:e005445.
Beuselinck B, Job S, Becht E, et al. Molecular subtypes of clear cell renal cell carcinoma are associated with sunitinib response in the metastatic setting. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21:1329–1339.
Vano Y-A, Elaidi R, Bennamoun M, et al. Nivolumab, nivolumab-ipilimumab, and VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line treatment for metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (BIONIKK): a biomarker-driven, open-label, noncomparative, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:612–624.
Powles T, Atkins MB, Escudier B, et al. Efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab following disease progression on atezolizumab or sunitinib monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Immotion150: a randomized phase 2 clinical trial. Eur Urol 2021; 79:665–673.
McDermott DF, Huseni MA, Atkins MB, et al. Clinical activity and molecular correlates of response to atezolizumab alone or in combination with bevacizumab versus sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma. Nat Med 2018; 24:749–757.
Motzer RJ, Banchereau R, Hamidi H, et al. Molecular subsets in renal cancer determine outcome to checkpoint and angiogenesis blockade. Cancer Cell 2020; 38:803–817.e4.
Rini BI, Powles T, Atkins MB, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sunitinib in patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (IMmotion151): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019; 393:2404–2415.
Derosa L, Hellmann MD, Spaziano M, et al. Negative association of antibiotics on clinical activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced renal cell and nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:1437–1444.
Routy B, Le Chatelier E, Derosa L, et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science 2018; 359:91–97.
Dizman N, Meza L, Bergerot P, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without live bacterial supplementation in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomized phase 1 trial. Nat Med 2022; 28:704–712.
Pal SK, Sonpavde G, Agarwal N, et al. Evolution of circulating tumor DNA profile from first-line to subsequent therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2017; 72:557–564.
Kinget L, Naulaerts S, Govaerts J, et al. A spatial architecture-embedding HLA signature to predict clinical response to immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma. Nat Med 2024; 30:1667–1679.
Rini BI, Dorff TB, Elson P, et al. Active surveillance in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a prospective, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17:1317–1324.
Eggener SE, Yossepowitch O, Kundu S, et al. Risk score and metastasectomy independently impact prognosis of patients with recurrent renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2008; 180:873–878. discussion 878.
Powles T, Albiges L, Bex A, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:692–706.
Zarba M, Ferrier E, Wells C, et al. Systemic treatments in favorable and very favorable risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Real world evidence from the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC). J Clin Oncol 2024; 42: (Suppl): 4514.
Panian J, Zhong C, Choi S, et al. Efficacy of postlenvatinib treatments in patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). J Clin Oncol 2024; 42: (Suppl): 4538.
Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N, et al. NCCN Guidelines® insights: kidney cancer, version 2. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2024; 22:4–16.
Choueiri TK, Tomczak P, Park SH, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in KEYNOTE-564: adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo for renal cell carcinoma. Oncologist 2024; 29:142–150.
Albiges L, Bex A, Suárez C, et al. Circulating kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) biomarker analysis in IMmotion010: a randomized phase 3 study of adjuvant (adj) atezolizumab (atezo) vs placebo (pbo) in patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at increased risk of recurrence after resection. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42: (Suppl): 4506.