Italian survey about intraperitoneal drain use in distal pancreatectomy.
Distal pancreatectomy
Drainage
Nicolò Pecorelli
Questionnaire
Regret
Survey
Journal
Updates in surgery
ISSN: 2038-3312
Titre abrégé: Updates Surg
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101539818
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Oct 2024
13 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
02
07
2024
accepted:
30
08
2024
medline:
14
10
2024
pubmed:
14
10
2024
entrez:
13
10
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Intraperitoneal prophylactic drain (IPD) use in distal pancreatectomy (DP) is still controversial. A survey was carried out through the Italian community of pancreatic surgeons using institutional emails, Twitter, and Facebook accounts of the Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas (AISP) and the Italian Association of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery (AICEP). The survey was structured to learn surgeons' practice in using IPD through questions and one clinical vignette. Respondents were asked to report their regrets for omission and commission regarding the IPD use for the clinical scenario, eliciting a scale between 0 (no regret) and 100 (maximum regret). The threshold model and a multilevel mixed regression were built to identify respondents' attitudes. One hundred six surgeons completed the survey. Sixty-three (59.4%) respondents confirmed using at least 1 drain, while 43 (40.6%) placed 2 IPDs. Only 13 respondents (12.3%) declared a change in IPD strategy in patients at high risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF), while 9 (9.4%) respondents changed their strategy in low-risk POPF situations. Thirty-five (35.5%) respondents declared they would remove the IPD within the third postoperative day (POD) in the absence of CR-POPF suspicion. The median omission regret, which proved to be the wrong decision, was 80 (50-100, IQR). The median regret due to the commission of IPD, which turned out to be useless, was 2.5 (1-20, IQR). The CR-POPF probability threshold at which drainage omission was the less regrettable choice was 7% (1-35, IQR). The threshold to perceive drain omission as the least regrettable choice was higher in female surgeons (P < 0.001), in surgeons who modulated the strategies based on the risk of CR-POPF, and in high volume centers (p = 0.039). The threshold was lower in surgeons who performed minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (P < 0.001), adopted a closed system (P < 0.001), placed two IPDs (P < 0.001), or perceived the IPD as important to prevent reintervention (p = 0.047). Drain management after DP remains very heterogeneous among surgeons. The regret model suggested that IPD omission could be performed in low-risk patients (7% of CR-POPF), leading to low regret in the case of the wrong decision, making it an acceptable clinical decision.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39397215
doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01987-0
pii: 10.1007/s13304-024-01987-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Investigateurs
Alberici Laura
(A)
Aleotti Francesca
(A)
Alfieri Sergio
(A)
Angrisani Marco
(A)
Anselmo Alessandro
(A)
Bannone Elisa
(B)
Barabino Matteo
(B)
Belfiori Giulio
(B)
Belli Andrea
(B)
Belli Giulio
(B)
Bonatti Chiara
(B)
Borgia Gianluca
(B)
Caccamo Lucio
(C)
Campra Donata
(C)
Caputo Damiano
(C)
Casadei Riccardo
(C)
Cescon Matteo
(C)
Citterio Davide
(C)
Colangelo Ettore
(C)
Colledan Michele
(C)
Coppola Roberto
(C)
Crippa Stefano
(C)
Dall'Olio Tommaso
(D)
De Carlis Luciano
(C)
De Giorgi Donato
(G)
De Luca Raffaele
(L)
Del Vecchio Antonella
(DV)
Della Valle Raffaele
(DV)
Di Benedetto Fabrizio
(DB)
Di Dato Armando Di Domenico Stefano
(DDA)
Di Meo Giovanni
(DM)
Di Sebastiano Pierluigi
(DS)
Ettorre Giuseppe Maria
(EG)
Fogliati Alessandro
(F)
Frena Antonio
(F)
Gavazzi Francesco
(G)
Giacomo Batignani
(G)
Gianotti Luca
(G)
Giuliante Felice
(G)
Grazi Gianluca
(G)
Grottola Tommaso
(G)
Gruttadauria Salvatore
(G)
Ingaldi Carlo
(I)
Isabella Frigerio
(I)
Izzo Francesco
(I)
La Barba Giuliano
(B)
Langella Serena
(L)
Lionetto Gabriella
(L)
Lombardi Raffaele
(L)
Maganuco Lorenzo
(M)
Maggino Laura
(M)
Malleo Giuseppe
(M)
Manzini Lorenzo
(M)
Marchegiani Giovanni
(M)
Marchetti Alessio
(M)
Marcucci Stefano
(M)
Massani Marco
(M)
Mastrangelo Laura
(M)
Mazzaferro Vincenzo
(M)
Mazzola Michele
(M)
Memeo Riccardo
(M)
Milanetto Anna Caterina
(MA)
Mocchegiani Federico
(M)
Moraldi Luca
(M)
Moro Francesco
(M)
Napoli Niccolò
(N)
Nappo Gennnaro
(N)
Nardo Bruno
(N)
Pacilio Carlo Alberto
(PC)
Paiella Salvatore
(P)
Papis Davide
(P)
Patriti Alberto
(P)
Patrono Damiano
(P)
Prosperi Enrico
(P)
Puglisi Silvana
(P)
Ramera Marco
(R)
Ravaioli Matteo
(R)
Rocca Aldo
(R)
Ruzzente Andrea
(R)
Sacco Luca
(S)
Scialantrone Grazisa
(S)
Serenari Matteo
(S)
Tamburrino Domenico
(T)
Tatani Bruna
(T)
Troisi Roberto
(T)
Veneroni Luigi
(V)
Vivarelli Marco
(V)
Zanello Matteo
(Z)
Zanus Giacomo
(Z)
Zingaretti Caterina Costanza
(ZC)
Zironda Andrea
(Z)
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Klompmaker S et al (2019) European consortium on minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (E-MIPS). Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (diploma): a pan-European propensity score matched study. Ann Surg 269(1):10–17
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002561
pubmed: 29099399
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M, International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years after. Surgery 161(3):584–591
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014
pubmed: 28040257
van Santvoort HC (2023) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: focus should be shifted from early drain removal to early management. BJS Open 7:zrac156
doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac156
pubmed: 36635244
pmcid: 9836927
Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.001
pubmed: 17629996
Van Buren G, Bloomston M, Schmidt CR et al (2017) A prospective randomized multicenter trial of distal pancreatectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage. Ann Surg 266:421–431
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002375
pubmed: 28692468
van Bodegraven EA, Balduzzi A, van Ramshorst TME, Malleo G, Vissers FL, van Hilst J, Festen S, Abu Hilal M, Asbun HJ, Michiels N, Koerkamp BG, Busch ORC, Daams F, Luyer MDP, Ramera M, Marchegiani G, Klaase JM, Molenaar IQ, de Pastena M, Lionetto G, Vacca PG, van Santvoort HC, Stommel MWJ, Lips DJ, Coolsen MME, Mieog JSD, Salvia R, van Eijck CHJ, Besselink MG, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (2024) Prophylactic abdominal drainage after distal pancreatectomy (PANDORINA): an international, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:438–447
doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00037-2
pubmed: 38499019
Pergolini I, Schorn S, Goess R, Novotny AR, Ceyhan GO, Friess H, Demir IE, International Pancreatic Surgery Centers (2022) Drain use in pancreatic surgery: results from an international survey among experts in the field. Surgery 172:265–272
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.11.023
pubmed: 34996604
Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM Jr (2013) A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216(1):1–14
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002
pubmed: 23122535
Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Hablus MA, Bari H, Pathanki AM, Ali M, Ahmad J, Marangoni G, Khan S, Lam FT (2024) Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of pancreatic stump closure using a hand-sewn or stapler technique in distal pancreatectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 28:302–314
doi: 10.14701/ahbps.24-015
pubmed: 38522846
pmcid: 11341886
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19(6):349–357
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
pubmed: 17872937
De Pastena M, van Bodegraven EA, Mungroop TH, Vissers FL, Jones LR, Marchegiani G, Balduzzi A, Klompmaker S, Paiella S, Tavakoli Rad S, Groot Koerkamp B, van Eijck C, Busch OR, de Hingh I, Luyer M, Barnhill C, Seykora T, Maxwell TT, de Rooij T, Tuveri M, Malleo G, Esposito A, Landoni L, Casetti L, Alseidi A, Salvia R, Steyerberg EW, Abu Hilal M, Vollmer CM, Besselink MG, Bassi C (2023) Distal pancreatectomy fistula risk score (D-FRS): development and international validation. Ann Surg 277(5):e1099–e1105
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005497
pubmed: 35797608
Van Bodegraven EA, den Haring FET, Pollemans B, Monselis D, De Pastena M, van Eijck C, Daams F, de Hingh I, Luyer M, Stommel MWJ, van Santvoort HC, Festen S, Mieog JSD, Klaase J, Lips D, Coolsen MME, van der Schelling GP, Manusama ER, Patijn G, van der Harst E, Bosscha K, Marchegiani G, Besselink MG (2023) Nationwide validation of the distal fistula risk score (D-FRS). Langenbecks Arch Surg 409(1):14
doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03192-w
pubmed: 38114826
Abu Hilal M, van Ramshorst TME, Boggi U et al (2024) The Brescia internationally validated European guidelines on minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (EGUMIPS). Ann Surg 279:45–57
pubmed: 37450702
Gachabayov M, Gogna S, Latifi R, Dong XD (2019) Passive drainage to gravity and closed-suction drainage following pancreatoduodenectomy lead to similar grade B and C postoperative pancreatic fistula rates. A meta-analysis. Int J Surg 67:24–31
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.05.001
pubmed: 31078675
Čečka F, Jon B, Skalický P, Čermáková E, Neoral Č, Loveček M (2018) Results of a randomized controlled trial comparing closed-suction drains versus passive gravity drains after pancreatic resection. Surgery 164(5):1057–1063
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.030
pubmed: 30082139
Djulbegovic B, Hozo I, Schwartz A, McMasters KM (1999) Acceptable regret in medical decision making. Med Hypotheses 53(3):253–259
doi: 10.1054/mehy.1998.0020
pubmed: 10580533
Cucchetti A, Djulbegovic B, Crippa S, Hozo I, Sbrancia M, Tsalatsanis A, Binda C, Fabbri C, Salvia R, Falconi M, Ercolani G, Reg-PanC study group (2023) Regret affects the choice between neoadjuvant therapy and upfront surgery for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Surgery 173(6):1421–1427
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.01.016
pubmed: 36932008
Ricci C, Pecorelli N, Esposito A, Capretti G, Partelli S, Butturini G, Boggi U, Cucchetti A, Zerbi A, Salvia R, Falconi M, Pan-Drain study group (2024) Intraperitoneal prophylactic drain after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an Italian survey. Updates Surg 76:923–932
doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01836-0
pubmed: 38662308
pmcid: 11130052
Osakabe H, Nagakawa Y, Kozono S, Takishita C, Nakagawa N, Nishino H, Suzuki K, Shirota T, Hosokawa Y, Akashi M, Ishizaki T, Katsumata K, Tsuchida A (2021) Causative bacteria associated with a clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula infection after distal pancreatectomy. Surg Today 51(11):1813–1818
doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02287-5
pubmed: 33907898
Ya H, Yu-pei Z, Quan L, et al (2008) Relationship between the pancreatic fistulae and the bacterial culture of abdominal draining fluid after pancreatic operations. Chin J Pract Surg 53–55
Wallis CJD, Jerath A, Aminoltejari K, Kaneshwaran K, Salles A, Coburn N, Wright FC, Gotlib Conn L, Klaassen Z, Luckenbaugh AN, Ranganathan S, Riveros C, McCartney C, Armstrong K, Bass B, Detsky AS, Satkunasivam R (2023) Surgeon sex and long-term postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing common surgeries. JAMA Surg 158(11):1185–1194
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.3744
pubmed: 37647075
pmcid: 10469289
Wallis CJ, Ravi B, Coburn N, Nam RK, Detsky AS, Satkunasivam R (2017) Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study. BMJ 359:j4366
doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4366
pubmed: 29018008
pmcid: 6284261
Sanjay P, Kellner M, Tait IS (2012) The role of interventional radiology in the management of surgical complications after pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB 14(12):812–817
doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00545.x
pubmed: 23134182
pmcid: 3521909
Woo DH, Lee JH, Park YJ, Lee WH, Song KB, Hwang DW, Kim SC (2022) Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage and percutaneous catheter drainage of postoperative fluid collection after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 26(4):355–362
doi: 10.14701/ahbps.22-018
pubmed: 36003001
pmcid: 9721245
Balzano G, Guarneri G, Pecorelli N, Partelli S, Crippa S, Vico A, Falconi M, Baglio G (2023) Geographical disparities and patients’ mobility: a plea for regionalization of pancreatic surgery in Italy. Cancers 15(9):2429
doi: 10.3390/cancers15092429
pubmed: 37173896
pmcid: 10177179