Conscientious Objection to Gender-Affirming Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Plastic Surgery and Urology Residency Programs.

Patient Care Systems-Based Practice conscientious objection gender-affirming surgery medical ethics physician refusal plastic surgery urology

Journal

Journal of surgical education
ISSN: 1878-7452
Titre abrégé: J Surg Educ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101303204

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 27 06 2024
revised: 02 08 2024
accepted: 22 08 2024
medline: 18 9 2024
pubmed: 18 9 2024
entrez: 17 9 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Medical conscientious objection is a federally protected right of physicians to refuse participation in medically indicated services or research activities that are incompatible with their ethical, moral, or religious beliefs. Individual provider objections to gender-affirming surgery have been documented, however the prevalence of such objections is unknown. Our study aimed to characterize physician objections to gender-affirming surgery in plastic surgery and urology residencies and to assess related institutional policies. A cross-sectional electronic survey was administered to program leadership of 239 accredited US plastic surgery and urology residencies from February to October 2023. Trainee exposure to gender-affirming surgery, programmatic experience with objections, and presence and content of institutional objection policies were collected. Bivariate analyses were performed to determine associations with objectors. One-hundred and twenty-four plastic surgery (n = 59) and urology (n = 65) residencies completed the survey, representing a 52% response rate. Most programs included didactic training (n = 107, 86%) and direct clinical exposure (n = 98, 79%) to gender-affirming surgery. Few (n = 24, 19%) endorsed existent objection policies. Sixteen programs (13%) experienced objections to gender-affirming surgery by trainees (n = 15), faculty (n = 6), and staff (n = 1). Neither geographic region, exposure to gender-affirming surgery, nor presence of objection policies significantly contributed to programmatic objections. Programs with formal objection policies reported increased confidence in addressing future objection events (p = 0.017). Objection to gender-affirming surgery is a rare, but plausible occurrence amongst plastic surgery and urology trainees. Residency programs should consider anticipatory policies to protect patients and, when feasible, provide reasonable accommodations for objecting trainees.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39288511
pii: S1931-7204(24)00399-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.08.022
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1675-1682

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Danielle J Eble (DJ)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Alisha L Nguyen (AL)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington; Department of Surgery, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington.

Cole V Roblee (CV)

Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Surgery, Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, Illinois.

Tannon L Tople (TL)

Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Jeffrey B Friedrich (JB)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Alexander J Skokan (AJ)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Judith C Hagedorn (JC)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Mathew D Sorensen (MD)

Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Kate H Kraft (KH)

Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Megan E Lane (ME)

Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Jeffrey E Janis (JE)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

William M Kuzon (WM)

Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Russell E Ettinger (RE)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Shane D Morrison (SD)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: shane.morrison@seattlechildrens.org.

Classifications MeSH