Conscientious Objection to Gender-Affirming Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Plastic Surgery and Urology Residency Programs.
Patient Care
Systems-Based Practice
conscientious objection
gender-affirming surgery
medical ethics
physician refusal
plastic surgery
urology
Journal
Journal of surgical education
ISSN: 1878-7452
Titre abrégé: J Surg Educ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101303204
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Sep 2024
16 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
27
06
2024
revised:
02
08
2024
accepted:
22
08
2024
medline:
18
9
2024
pubmed:
18
9
2024
entrez:
17
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Medical conscientious objection is a federally protected right of physicians to refuse participation in medically indicated services or research activities that are incompatible with their ethical, moral, or religious beliefs. Individual provider objections to gender-affirming surgery have been documented, however the prevalence of such objections is unknown. Our study aimed to characterize physician objections to gender-affirming surgery in plastic surgery and urology residencies and to assess related institutional policies. A cross-sectional electronic survey was administered to program leadership of 239 accredited US plastic surgery and urology residencies from February to October 2023. Trainee exposure to gender-affirming surgery, programmatic experience with objections, and presence and content of institutional objection policies were collected. Bivariate analyses were performed to determine associations with objectors. One-hundred and twenty-four plastic surgery (n = 59) and urology (n = 65) residencies completed the survey, representing a 52% response rate. Most programs included didactic training (n = 107, 86%) and direct clinical exposure (n = 98, 79%) to gender-affirming surgery. Few (n = 24, 19%) endorsed existent objection policies. Sixteen programs (13%) experienced objections to gender-affirming surgery by trainees (n = 15), faculty (n = 6), and staff (n = 1). Neither geographic region, exposure to gender-affirming surgery, nor presence of objection policies significantly contributed to programmatic objections. Programs with formal objection policies reported increased confidence in addressing future objection events (p = 0.017). Objection to gender-affirming surgery is a rare, but plausible occurrence amongst plastic surgery and urology trainees. Residency programs should consider anticipatory policies to protect patients and, when feasible, provide reasonable accommodations for objecting trainees.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39288511
pii: S1931-7204(24)00399-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.08.022
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1675-1682Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.