Unravelling dispersion forces in liquid-phase enantioseparation. Part II: Planar chiral 1-(iodoethynyl)-3-arylferrocenes.

Dispersion forces Enantioseparation High-performance liquid chromatography Planar chiral ferrocenes Polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phases

Journal

Analytica chimica acta
ISSN: 1873-4324
Titre abrégé: Anal Chim Acta
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0370534

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 16 05 2024
revised: 28 07 2024
accepted: 26 08 2024
medline: 13 9 2024
pubmed: 13 9 2024
entrez: 12 9 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In the first part of our study on possible contribution of dispersion forces in liquid-phase enantioseparations, the enantioseparation of the axially chiral 3,3'-dibromo-5,5'-bis-ferrocenylethynyl-4,4'-bipyridine with an amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate)-based chiral column appeared reasonably consistent with a picture of the enantioselective recognition based on the interplay between hydrogen bond (HB), π-π stacking and dispersion interactions. In the second part of this study, we evaluated the impact of analyte and chiral stationary phase (CSP) structure, mobile phase and temperature on the enantioseparations of planar chiral 1-(iodoethynyl)-3-arylferrocenes (3-aryl = phenyl, 2-naphthyl, 4-methylphenyl, 4-t-butylphenyl) with polysaccharide-based chiral columns. The main aim of the present study was to understand the molecular bases of the high affinity observed for the second eluted (R This study reasonably showed that the contribution of dispersion forces may explain the unusually large retention of the second eluted enantiomers observed for the enantioseparation of some planar chiral 1-(iodoethynyl)-3-arylferrocenes with amylose-based selectors. Based on the obtained results, we can conclude that in liquid-phase enantioseparation steric repulsion can be turned into attraction depending on the features of analyte, selector, and mobile phase.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In the first part of our study on possible contribution of dispersion forces in liquid-phase enantioseparations, the enantioseparation of the axially chiral 3,3'-dibromo-5,5'-bis-ferrocenylethynyl-4,4'-bipyridine with an amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate)-based chiral column appeared reasonably consistent with a picture of the enantioselective recognition based on the interplay between hydrogen bond (HB), π-π stacking and dispersion interactions.
RESULTS RESULTS
In the second part of this study, we evaluated the impact of analyte and chiral stationary phase (CSP) structure, mobile phase and temperature on the enantioseparations of planar chiral 1-(iodoethynyl)-3-arylferrocenes (3-aryl = phenyl, 2-naphthyl, 4-methylphenyl, 4-t-butylphenyl) with polysaccharide-based chiral columns. The main aim of the present study was to understand the molecular bases of the high affinity observed for the second eluted (R
SIGNIFICANCE CONCLUSIONS
This study reasonably showed that the contribution of dispersion forces may explain the unusually large retention of the second eluted enantiomers observed for the enantioseparation of some planar chiral 1-(iodoethynyl)-3-arylferrocenes with amylose-based selectors. Based on the obtained results, we can conclude that in liquid-phase enantioseparation steric repulsion can be turned into attraction depending on the features of analyte, selector, and mobile phase.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39266063
pii: S0003-2670(24)00961-9
doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2024.343160
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

343160

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Barbara Sechi (B)

Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare ICB-CNR, Sede secondaria di Sassari, Traversa La Crucca 3, Regione Baldinca, Li Punti, 07100, Sassari, Italy.

Nutsa Tsetskhladze (N)

Institute of Physical and Analytical Chemistry, School of Exact and Natural Sciences, Tbilisi State University, Chavchavadze Ave 3, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia.

Luke Connell (L)

Institut de Chimie de Strasbourg, UMR CNRS 7177, Equipe CLIC, 1 rue Blaise Pascal, 67008, Strasbourg Cedex, France.

Alessandro Dessì (A)

Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare ICB-CNR, Sede secondaria di Sassari, Traversa La Crucca 3, Regione Baldinca, Li Punti, 07100, Sassari, Italy.

Roberto Dallocchio (R)

Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare ICB-CNR, Sede secondaria di Sassari, Traversa La Crucca 3, Regione Baldinca, Li Punti, 07100, Sassari, Italy.

Bezhan Chankvetadze (B)

Institute of Physical and Analytical Chemistry, School of Exact and Natural Sciences, Tbilisi State University, Chavchavadze Ave 3, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia.

Sergio Cossu (S)

Dipartimento di Scienze Molecolari e Nanosistemi DSMN, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, Via Torino 155, I-30172, Mestre Venezia, Italy.

Tamar Khatiashvili (T)

Institute of Physical and Analytical Chemistry, School of Exact and Natural Sciences, Tbilisi State University, Chavchavadze Ave 3, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia.

Victor Mamane (V)

Institut de Chimie de Strasbourg, UMR CNRS 7177, Equipe CLIC, 1 rue Blaise Pascal, 67008, Strasbourg Cedex, France. Electronic address: vmamane@unistra.fr.

Paola Peluso (P)

Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare ICB-CNR, Sede secondaria di Sassari, Traversa La Crucca 3, Regione Baldinca, Li Punti, 07100, Sassari, Italy. Electronic address: paola.peluso@cnr.it.

Classifications MeSH