Strengthening facility-based integrated emergency care services for time sensitive emergencies at all levels of healthcare in India: An implementation research study protocol.
India
Humans
Emergency Medical Services
/ organization & administration
Health Facilities
/ standards
Emergencies
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
/ organization & administration
Research Design
Delivery of Health Care
Time Factors
Health Services Research
Implementation Science
Stakeholder Participation
Emergency care services
Implementation research
India
Time-sensitive conditions
Journal
Health research policy and systems
ISSN: 1478-4505
Titre abrégé: Health Res Policy Syst
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Sep 2024
09 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
10
04
2024
accepted:
15
07
2024
medline:
10
9
2024
pubmed:
10
9
2024
entrez:
9
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The healthcare system in India is tiered and has primary, secondary and tertiary levels of facilities depending on the complexity and severity of health challenges at these facilities. Evidence suggests that emergency services in the country is fragmented. This study aims to identify the barriers and facilitators of emergency care delivery for patients with time-sensitive conditions, and develop and implement a contextually relevant model, and measure its impact using implementation research outcomes. We will study 85 healthcare facilities across five zones of the country and focus on emergency care delivery for 11 time-sensitive conditions. This implementation research will include seven phases: the preparatory phase, formative assessment, co-design of Model "Zero", co-implementation, model optimization, end-line evaluation and consolidation phase. The "preparatory phase" will involve stakeholder meetings, approval from health authorities and the establishment of a research ecosystem. The "formative assessment" will include quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the existing healthcare facilities and personnel to identify gaps, barriers and facilitators of emergency care services for time-sensitive conditions. On the basis of the results of the formative assessment, context-specific implementation strategies will be developed through meetings with stakeholders, providers and experts. The "co-design of Model 'Zero'" phase will help develop the initial Model "Zero", which will be pilot tested on a small scale (co-implementation). In the "model optimization" phase, iterative feedback loops of meetings and testing various strategies will help develop and implement the final context-specific model. End-line evaluation will assess implementation research outcomes such as acceptability, adoption, fidelity and penetration. The consolidation phase will include planning for the sustenance of the interventions. In a country such as India, where resources are scarce, this study will identify the barriers and facilitators to delivering emergency care services for time-sensitive conditions across five varied zones of the country. Stakeholder and provider participation in developing consensus-based implementation strategies, along with iterative cycles of meetings and testing, will help adapt these strategies to local needs. This approach will ensure that the developed models are practical, feasible and tailored to the specific challenges and requirements of each region.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The healthcare system in India is tiered and has primary, secondary and tertiary levels of facilities depending on the complexity and severity of health challenges at these facilities. Evidence suggests that emergency services in the country is fragmented. This study aims to identify the barriers and facilitators of emergency care delivery for patients with time-sensitive conditions, and develop and implement a contextually relevant model, and measure its impact using implementation research outcomes.
METHODS
METHODS
We will study 85 healthcare facilities across five zones of the country and focus on emergency care delivery for 11 time-sensitive conditions. This implementation research will include seven phases: the preparatory phase, formative assessment, co-design of Model "Zero", co-implementation, model optimization, end-line evaluation and consolidation phase. The "preparatory phase" will involve stakeholder meetings, approval from health authorities and the establishment of a research ecosystem. The "formative assessment" will include quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the existing healthcare facilities and personnel to identify gaps, barriers and facilitators of emergency care services for time-sensitive conditions. On the basis of the results of the formative assessment, context-specific implementation strategies will be developed through meetings with stakeholders, providers and experts. The "co-design of Model 'Zero'" phase will help develop the initial Model "Zero", which will be pilot tested on a small scale (co-implementation). In the "model optimization" phase, iterative feedback loops of meetings and testing various strategies will help develop and implement the final context-specific model. End-line evaluation will assess implementation research outcomes such as acceptability, adoption, fidelity and penetration. The consolidation phase will include planning for the sustenance of the interventions.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
In a country such as India, where resources are scarce, this study will identify the barriers and facilitators to delivering emergency care services for time-sensitive conditions across five varied zones of the country. Stakeholder and provider participation in developing consensus-based implementation strategies, along with iterative cycles of meetings and testing, will help adapt these strategies to local needs. This approach will ensure that the developed models are practical, feasible and tailored to the specific challenges and requirements of each region.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39252001
doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01183-x
pii: 10.1186/s12961-024-01183-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
125Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Reynolds TA, Sawe H, Rubiano AM, Shin SD, Wallis L, Mock CN, et al. Strengthening health systems to provide emergency care. In: Jamison DT, Gelband H, Horton S, Jha P, Laxminarayan R, Mock CN, et al., editors. Disease control priorities: improving health and reducing poverty. 3rd ed. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; 2017.
World Health Organization: WHO. (2020, December 9). The top 10 causes of death. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death . Accessed 29 Jan 2024.
Chang CY, Abujaber S, Reynolds TA, Camargo CA, Obermeyer Z. Burden of emergency conditions and emergency care usage: new estimates from 40 countries. Emerg Med J. 2016;33:794–800.
doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205709
pubmed: 27334758
Lang ES, Wyer PC, Eskin B. Executive summary: knowledge translation in emergency medicine: establishing a research agenda and guide map for evidence uptake. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:915–8.
doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.07.005
pubmed: 17923716
UN DESA Policy Brief No. 153: India overtakes China as the world’s most populous country. (2023, April 24). https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/un-desa-policy-brief-no-153-india-overtakes-china-as-the-worlds-most-populous-country/ .
Misra A, Yadav DC, Kole T. Emergency care in India beyond 75 years of independence – problems and solutions. J Glob Health. 2023;13:03015.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.03015
pubmed: 37052203
pmcid: 10099406
Emergency and injury care at secondary and tertiary level centres in India. A report of current status on country level assessment. https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2021-12/AIIMS_STUDY_1.pdf . Accessed 10 Apr 2024.
Wibring K, Magnusson C, Axelsson C, Lundgren P, Herlitz J, Andersson HM. Towards definitions of time-sensitive conditions in prehospital care. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020;28:7.
doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-0706-3
pubmed: 31996233
pmcid: 6988345
Obermeyer Z, Abujaber S, Makar M, Stoll S, Kayden SR, Wallis LA, et al. Emergency care in 59 low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93:577-586G.
doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.148338
pubmed: 26478615
pmcid: 4581659
Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, Hill SJ, Squires JE. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci. 2012;7:50.
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-50
pubmed: 22651257
pmcid: 3462671
de Wit K, Curran J, Thoma B, Dowling S, Lang E, Kuljic N, et al. Review of implementation strategies to change healthcare provider behaviour in the emergency department. CJEM. 2018;20:453–60.
doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.432
pubmed: 29429430
Asha S, Curtis KA, Grant N, Taylor C, Lo S, Smart R, et al. Comparison of radiation exposure of trauma patients from diagnostic radiology procedures before and after the introduction of a panscan protocol. Emerg Med Australas. 2012;24:43–51.
doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01504.x
pubmed: 22313559
Baker K, Brierley S, Mitchell G, Roe J. Effecting change using careplans: experience from two fractured neck of femur pathways. Aust Health Rev. 2012;36:308–12.
doi: 10.1071/AH11021
pubmed: 22935123
Ballow SL, Kaups KL, Anderson S, Chang M. A standardized rapid sequence intubation protocol facilitates airway management in critically injured patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73:1401–5.
doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318270dcf5
pubmed: 23188232
Bressan S, Romanato S, Mion T, Zanconato S, Da Dalt L. Implementation of adapted PECARN decision rule for children with minor head injury in the pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19:801–7.
doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01384.x
pubmed: 22724450
Heskestad B, Waterloo K, Ingebrigtsen T, Romner B, Harr ME, Helseth E. An observational study of compliance with the Scandinavian guidelines for management of minimal, mild and moderate head injury. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012;20:32.
doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-32
pubmed: 22510221
pmcid: 3352311
Puljula J, Cygnel H, Mäkinen E, Tuomivaara V, Karttunen V, Karttunen A, et al. Mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis frequently remains unrecorded in subjects with craniofacial fractures. Injury. 2012;43:2100–4.
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.04.010
pubmed: 22552039
Lim C, Bawden J, Wing A, Villa-Roel C, Meurer DP, Bullard MJ, et al. Febrile neutropenia in EDs: the role of an electronic clinical practice guideline. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30:5-11.e5.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.08.011
pubmed: 21030183
Na S, Kuan WS, Mahadevan M, Li C-H, Shrikhande P, Ray S, et al. Implementation of early goal-directed therapy and the surviving sepsis campaign resuscitation bundle in Asia. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;24:452–62.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs045
pubmed: 22899698
Nguyen HM, Schiavoni A, Scott KD, Tanios MA. Implementation of sepsis management guideline in a community-based teaching hospital – can education be potentially beneficial for septic patients? Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66:705–10.
doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.02939.x
pubmed: 22698423
Plambech MZ, Lurie AI, Ipsen HL. Initial, successful implementation of sepsis guidelines in an emergency department. Dan Med J. 2012;59:A4545.
pubmed: 23290285
Georgiou A, Lam M, Allardice J, Hart GK, Westbrook JI. Troponin testing in the emergency department: a longitudinal study to assess the impact and sustainability of decision support strategies. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65:546–50.
doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200610
pubmed: 22412052
Kinsman LD, Rotter T, Willis J, Snow PC, Buykx P, Humphreys JS. Do clinical pathways enhance access to evidence-based acute myocardial infarction treatment in rural emergency departments? Aust J Rural Health. 2012;20:59–66.
doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2012.01262.x
pubmed: 22435765
Asadi L, Eurich DT, Gamble J-M, Minhas-Sandhu JK, Marrie TJ, Majumdar SR. Guideline adherence and macrolides reduced mortality in outpatients with pneumonia. Respir Med. 2012;106:451–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.11.017
pubmed: 22182341
Chokshi M, Patil B, Khanna R, Neogi SB, Sharma J, Paul VK, et al. Health systems in India. J Perinatol. 2016;36:S9-12.
doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.184
pubmed: 27924110
pmcid: 5144115
Naghavi M, Ong KL, Aali A, Ababneh HS, Abate YH, Abbafati C, et al. Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403:2100–32.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00367-2
Powell BJ, Beidas RS, Lewis CC, Aarons GA, McMillen JC, Proctor EK, et al. Methods to improve the selection and tailoring of implementation strategies. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2017;44:177–94.
doi: 10.1007/s11414-015-9475-6
pubmed: 26289563
pmcid: 4761530
Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38:65–76.
doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
pubmed: 20957426
Moen, R. "Foundation and History of the PDSA Cycle." Asian network for quality conference. Tokyo. https://www.deming.org/sites/default/files/pdf/2015/PDSA_History_Ron_Moen.Pdf.2009 . 2009. Accessed 11 Apr 2024.
Naeem M, Ozuem W, Howell K, Ranfagni S. A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2023;22:16094069231205788.
doi: 10.1177/16094069231205789