Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device into the bladder complicated by stone formation an exceptional complication: case report and literature review.

Calcification Cystoscopy IUCD Intravesicale migration

Journal

Contraception and reproductive medicine
ISSN: 2055-7426
Titre abrégé: Contracept Reprod Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101703414

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 16 06 2024
accepted: 07 08 2024
medline: 28 8 2024
pubmed: 28 8 2024
entrez: 27 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We report a rare and unusual case of intravesical migration of an intrauterine device with stone formation. The intrauterine device (IUD) is the most common method of reversible contraception in women. However, its insertion is not without risk, it can cause early or late complications. IUD can perforate the uterus wall and migrate into adjacent structures. A 35 year-old female 5 gravid, 4 para has been benefited from intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) 5 years ago, she was presented to gynecological consultation for chronic pelvic pain with urinary symptoms. There was history of a good IUD insertion 5 years ago, considered expelled after one month of its pose. Physical examination was normal, but a pelvic ultrasound and a plain abdominal radiography allowed the detection of an IUD outside the uterine cavity, but inside bladder. A diagnostic and therapeutic cystoscopy was performed, and the IUD with calculus was successfully removed. There were no postoperative complications. This case is reported to highlight and to reiterate the need to think about one of the rare complication of IUD insertion, which every practitioner must know, it's the transuterovesical migration, before concluding wrongly to its expulsion. It's a consequence of, non-compliance with the rules for inserting an IUD and poor monitoring. The evolution towards calcification is a certain consequence; its screening involves rigorous clinical monitoring.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
We report a rare and unusual case of intravesical migration of an intrauterine device with stone formation. The intrauterine device (IUD) is the most common method of reversible contraception in women. However, its insertion is not without risk, it can cause early or late complications. IUD can perforate the uterus wall and migrate into adjacent structures.
CASE PRESENTATION METHODS
A 35 year-old female 5 gravid, 4 para has been benefited from intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) 5 years ago, she was presented to gynecological consultation for chronic pelvic pain with urinary symptoms. There was history of a good IUD insertion 5 years ago, considered expelled after one month of its pose. Physical examination was normal, but a pelvic ultrasound and a plain abdominal radiography allowed the detection of an IUD outside the uterine cavity, but inside bladder. A diagnostic and therapeutic cystoscopy was performed, and the IUD with calculus was successfully removed. There were no postoperative complications.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This case is reported to highlight and to reiterate the need to think about one of the rare complication of IUD insertion, which every practitioner must know, it's the transuterovesical migration, before concluding wrongly to its expulsion. It's a consequence of, non-compliance with the rules for inserting an IUD and poor monitoring. The evolution towards calcification is a certain consequence; its screening involves rigorous clinical monitoring.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39192372
doi: 10.1186/s40834-024-00302-x
pii: 10.1186/s40834-024-00302-x
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

42

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Aljohani A, Alzarea AA, Alnafee R, Aljadaani KS, Sairafi R, Alzahrani A. Migrated intrauterine device: case series report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023;111:108631.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108631 pubmed: 37757734 pmcid: 10978329
Verstraeten V, Vossaert K, Van den Bosch T. Migration of intra-uterine devices. Open Access J Contracept. 2024;12:15.
Rasyid N, Nainggolan HJ, Jonardi PA, Raharja PAR, Wiweko B, Atmoko W, et al. Early-onset complete spontaneous migration of contraceptive intrauterine device to the bladder in a post C-section patient: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2021;82:105850.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.105850 pubmed: 33838481 pmcid: 8056411
Bahamondes L, Fernandes A, Monteiro I, Bahamondes MV. Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARCs) methods. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;66:28–40.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.12.002 pubmed: 32014434
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 735: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and Intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(5):e130–9.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002632
Gehani M, Pal M, Arya A, Singh S, O’Connell SK, Cagatay KA, Sengupta L, Singal S. Potential for improving intrauterine device (IUD) service delivery quality: results from a secondary data analysis. Gates Open Res. 2020;3:1473.
doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.12997.3 pubmed: 31633085 pmcid: 6784301
Yahsi S, Aktas BK, Erbay G, Salar R, Gokkaya CS. Intravesical migration of intrauterine device mimicking bladder stone on radiologic imaging: a case report. Indian J Surg. 2015;77(Suppl 1):97–9.
doi: 10.1007/s12262-014-1176-5 pubmed: 25972660
Ibghi W, Batt M, Bongain A, Declemy S, Proton A, Hassen- Kodhja R, Lepas P, Gillet JY. Iliac vein stenosis caused by intrauterine device migration. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1995;24:273–5.
Bacha K, ben amna M, Ben Hassine L, Ghaddab S, Ayed M. Intrauterine device migrating to the bladder. Prog Urol. 2001;11:1289–91.
pubmed: 11859668
Kassab B, Audra P. The migrating intrauterine device. Case report and review of the literature. Contracept Fertil Sex. 1999;27:696–700.
pubmed: 10605179
Bakri S, Azis A, Nusraya A, Putra MZDA, Natsir AS, Pattimura MIF. Intrauterine device (IUD) migration into the bladder with stone formation: a case report. Urol Case Rep. 2023;15:49102439.
Benaguida H, Kiram H, Ely Cheikh Telmoudi EC, Ouafidi B, Benhessou M, Ennachit M, Elkarroum M. Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device (IUD): a case report. Annals Med Surg. 2021;68:102547.
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102547
Bakri S, Azis A, Nusraya A, Putra MZDA, Natsir AS, Pattimura MIF. Intrauterine device (IUD) migration into the bladder with stone formation: a case report. Urol Case Rep. 2023;49:102439.
doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2023.102439 pubmed: 37250963 pmcid: 10220218
Vidhyarthy AK, Hameed T, Lal R, Kumar A, Sahni S, Mendoza N. Giant bladder Calculus in an Adult- A persistent problem in the developing world: a Case Report. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2020;4(4):544–7.
doi: 10.5811/cpcem.2020.7.47653 pubmed: 33217268 pmcid: 7676780
Mhiri MN, Bayondh H, Mhiri CH, Rekik S, Smida L. Le Calcul vésical Chez La Femme à propos de 10 cas. J Gynécol Obst Reprod. 1990;19(8):979–82.
Vecsey D. Intrauterine device a rare foreign body in the urinary bladder. Med klin. 1988;83(17):575–6.
Kiilholma P, Makinen J, Vuori J. Bladder perforation: uncommon complication with a misplaced IUD. Adv Contracept. 1989;5:47.
doi: 10.1007/BF02340134 pubmed: 2782133
Nouioui MA, Taktak T, Mokadem S, Mediouni H, Khiari R, Ghozzi S. A mislocated intrauterine device migrating to the urinary bladder: an uncommon complication leading to stone formation. Case Rep Urol. 2020; 2020:2091915.
Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell DH. Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives. Open Access J Contracept. 2016;7:19.
doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S85546 pubmed: 29386934 pmcid: 5683155
Agil A, Tjahjodjati T, Atik N, Rachmadi N, Zahrina D. TT. Case Report: iatrogenic trauma of the bladder due to long-term unidentified intrauterine device malposition inside the bladder with rectovesical fistula. F1000Res 2024 Jan 5:121390.

Auteurs

Hanane Houmaid (H)

Gynecology Obstetrics Departement, Mohammed the VI University Medical Center, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, Morocco. h.houmaid@uca.ac.ma.

Karam Harou (K)

Gynecology Obstetrics Departement, Mohammed the VI University Medical Center, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, Morocco.

Bouchra Fakhir (B)

Gynecology Obstetrics Departement, Mohammed the VI University Medical Center, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, Morocco.

Ahlam Bassir (A)

Gynecology Obstetrics Departement, Mohammed the VI University Medical Center, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, Morocco.

Lahcen Boukhanni (L)

Gynecology Obstetrics Departement, Mohammed the VI University Medical Center, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, Morocco.

Abderrahim Aboulfalah (A)

Gynecology Obstetrics Departement, Mohammed the VI University Medical Center, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, Morocco.

Hamid Asmouki (H)

Gynecology Obstetrics Departement, Mohammed the VI University Medical Center, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, Morocco.

Abderraouf Soummani (A)

Gynecology Obstetrics Departement, Mohammed the VI University Medical Center, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, Morocco.

Classifications MeSH