Left Ventricular Mass as a Modulator of Ventricular Arrhythmia Risk and Sex Differences Following CRT for Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and LBBB.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy LV mass Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy Sex ventricular Arrhythmias

Journal

Heart rhythm
ISSN: 1556-3871
Titre abrégé: Heart Rhythm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101200317

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 18 03 2024
revised: 01 07 2024
accepted: 13 07 2024
medline: 1 8 2024
pubmed: 1 8 2024
entrez: 31 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Risk for ventricular arrhythmias (VA) following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been associated with ischemic disease/scar, sex, and possibly left ventricular mass (LVM). To evaluate sex differences and baseline/post-implant change [Δ] of LVM on VA risk after CRT implant among patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and left bundle branch block. Among patients meeting the criteria, baseline and follow-up echocardiographic images were obtained for LVM assessment. VA events were reported from device diagnostics and therapies. VA risk was stratified by ROC (Youden-index cut-point) for baseline LVM and ΔLVM, and baseline patient characteristics using a multivariable Cox regression model. 118 patients (71[60.2%] female, age 60.5 ±11.3 years, LVEF 19.2 ±7.0%, QRS 165.6 ±20 ms, LVM 313.9 ±108.8 g) were enrolled and followed for median 90 (IQR 44-158) months. Thirty-five (29.6%) patients received appropriate shocks or anti-tachycardia pacing at a median of 73.5 (IQR 25-130) months post-implant. Males had a higher VA incidence (male 18/47 [38.3%] vs. female 17/71 [23.9%], P=0.02). Baseline LVM >308.9g separated patients with higher VA risk (P=0.001). Less than a 20% decrease in LVM increased VA risk (P<0.001). Baseline LVM was the only baseline characteristic predicting VA events in the Cox regression model (Hazard ratio 1.01 [95%CI, 1.001-1.009], Log-rank P=0.003). Sex differences in VA risk were eliminated by the baseline LVM parameters. VA risk after CRT in NICM was associated with baseline LV >308.9g and a decrease in LVM ≤ 20%, without sex differences.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Risk for ventricular arrhythmias (VA) following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been associated with ischemic disease/scar, sex, and possibly left ventricular mass (LVM).
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To evaluate sex differences and baseline/post-implant change [Δ] of LVM on VA risk after CRT implant among patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and left bundle branch block.
METHODS METHODS
Among patients meeting the criteria, baseline and follow-up echocardiographic images were obtained for LVM assessment. VA events were reported from device diagnostics and therapies. VA risk was stratified by ROC (Youden-index cut-point) for baseline LVM and ΔLVM, and baseline patient characteristics using a multivariable Cox regression model.
RESULTS RESULTS
118 patients (71[60.2%] female, age 60.5 ±11.3 years, LVEF 19.2 ±7.0%, QRS 165.6 ±20 ms, LVM 313.9 ±108.8 g) were enrolled and followed for median 90 (IQR 44-158) months. Thirty-five (29.6%) patients received appropriate shocks or anti-tachycardia pacing at a median of 73.5 (IQR 25-130) months post-implant. Males had a higher VA incidence (male 18/47 [38.3%] vs. female 17/71 [23.9%], P=0.02). Baseline LVM >308.9g separated patients with higher VA risk (P=0.001). Less than a 20% decrease in LVM increased VA risk (P<0.001). Baseline LVM was the only baseline characteristic predicting VA events in the Cox regression model (Hazard ratio 1.01 [95%CI, 1.001-1.009], Log-rank P=0.003). Sex differences in VA risk were eliminated by the baseline LVM parameters.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
VA risk after CRT in NICM was associated with baseline LV >308.9g and a decrease in LVM ≤ 20%, without sex differences.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39084586
pii: S1547-5271(24)03084-4
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.07.106
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Koji Higuchi (K)

Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: higuchk3@ccf.org.

Mahesh Manne (M)

Department of Hospital Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Patrick Tchou (P)

Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Bryan Baranowski (B)

Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Mandeep Bhargava (M)

Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Thomas Callahan (T)

Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Mina Chung (M)

Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Thomas Dresing (T)

Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Ayman Hussein (A)

Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Mohamed Kanj (M)

Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Kenneth Mayuga (K)

Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Shady Nakhla (S)

Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Walid Saliba (W)

Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

John Rickard (J)

Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Oussama Wazni (O)

Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Pasquale Santangeli (P)

Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Jakub Sroubek (J)

Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Niraj Varma (N)

Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Classifications MeSH