Long-lasting residual efficacy of Actellic®300CS and Icon®10CS on different surfaces against Anopheles stephensi, an invasive malaria vector.
Actellic®300CS
Anopheles stephensi
Icon®10CS
Iran
long‐lasting residual efficacy
malaria
Journal
Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH
ISSN: 1365-3156
Titre abrégé: Trop Med Int Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9610576
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Jul 2024
31 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline:
31
7
2024
pubmed:
31
7
2024
entrez:
31
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Anopheles stephensi, a malaria-transmitting mosquito species, has developed resistance to various insecticides such as DDT, Dieldrin, Malathion, and synthetic pyrethroids. To combat this issue, the World Health Organization (WHO) suggests using Actellic®300CS and Icon®10CS for Indoor Residual Spraying to tackle pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes. The aim of this research project was to evaluate the susceptibility of An. stephensi to certain insecticides at the diagnostic concentration + intensity 5x diagnostic concentration (5XDC) assays in Iran and to study the lasting effectiveness of Actellic®300CS and Icon®10CS against this particular malaria vector. This study assessed the susceptibility of An. stephensi populations in southern Iran to various insecticides, including deltamethrin 0.05%, DDT 4%, malathion 5%, bendiocarb 0.1%, a synergist assay with PBO 4% combined with deltamethrin 0.05%, and an intensity assay using 5x the diagnostic concentration of deltamethrin (0.25%) and bendiocarb 0.5%. Laboratory cone bioassay tests were conducted to determine the residual effectiveness of Actellic®300 and Icon®10CS insecticides on different surfaces commonly found in households, such as cement, mud, plaster, and wood. The tests were carried out following the WHO test kits and standard testing protocols. The An. stephensi populations in Bandar Abbas were found to be susceptible to malathion 5% and deltamethrin 0.25% (5XDC), but exhibited resistance to DDT, standard concentration of deltamethrin, and both standard and intensity concentrations of bendiocarb. In laboratory cone bioassay tests, An. stephensi mortality rates when exposed to Actellic®300CS and Icon®10CS on different surfaces remained consistently more than 80%. Actellic®300CS achieved more than 80% mortality on all substrates for the entire 300-day post-spraying period. Conversely, Icon®10CS maintained mortality rates more than 80% on plaster and wood surfaces for 165 days and on mud and cement surfaces for 270 days post-spraying. Both Actellic®300CS and Icon®10CS demonstrated 100% mortality within 72 h of each test on all surfaces throughout the entire 300-day post-spraying period. The study shows the varying levels of resistance of An. stephensi Bandar Abbas population to different insecticides and demonstrates the consistent performance of Actellic®300CS in controlling these mosquitoes on various surfaces. The findings suggest that long-lasting CS formulations may be more effective for malaria vector control compared to the current options. Further research is needed to validate these findings in field settings and assess the impact of these insecticides on malaria transmission.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Anopheles stephensi, a malaria-transmitting mosquito species, has developed resistance to various insecticides such as DDT, Dieldrin, Malathion, and synthetic pyrethroids. To combat this issue, the World Health Organization (WHO) suggests using Actellic®300CS and Icon®10CS for Indoor Residual Spraying to tackle pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes. The aim of this research project was to evaluate the susceptibility of An. stephensi to certain insecticides at the diagnostic concentration + intensity 5x diagnostic concentration (5XDC) assays in Iran and to study the lasting effectiveness of Actellic®300CS and Icon®10CS against this particular malaria vector.
METHODS
METHODS
This study assessed the susceptibility of An. stephensi populations in southern Iran to various insecticides, including deltamethrin 0.05%, DDT 4%, malathion 5%, bendiocarb 0.1%, a synergist assay with PBO 4% combined with deltamethrin 0.05%, and an intensity assay using 5x the diagnostic concentration of deltamethrin (0.25%) and bendiocarb 0.5%. Laboratory cone bioassay tests were conducted to determine the residual effectiveness of Actellic®300 and Icon®10CS insecticides on different surfaces commonly found in households, such as cement, mud, plaster, and wood. The tests were carried out following the WHO test kits and standard testing protocols.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The An. stephensi populations in Bandar Abbas were found to be susceptible to malathion 5% and deltamethrin 0.25% (5XDC), but exhibited resistance to DDT, standard concentration of deltamethrin, and both standard and intensity concentrations of bendiocarb. In laboratory cone bioassay tests, An. stephensi mortality rates when exposed to Actellic®300CS and Icon®10CS on different surfaces remained consistently more than 80%. Actellic®300CS achieved more than 80% mortality on all substrates for the entire 300-day post-spraying period. Conversely, Icon®10CS maintained mortality rates more than 80% on plaster and wood surfaces for 165 days and on mud and cement surfaces for 270 days post-spraying. Both Actellic®300CS and Icon®10CS demonstrated 100% mortality within 72 h of each test on all surfaces throughout the entire 300-day post-spraying period.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The study shows the varying levels of resistance of An. stephensi Bandar Abbas population to different insecticides and demonstrates the consistent performance of Actellic®300CS in controlling these mosquitoes on various surfaces. The findings suggest that long-lasting CS formulations may be more effective for malaria vector control compared to the current options. Further research is needed to validate these findings in field settings and assess the impact of these insecticides on malaria transmission.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
World Health Organization. Malaria. 2023 https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malaria Accessed 4 Dec 2023.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Malaria. 2023 https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/index.html Accessed 12 Mar 2024.
Raviglione M, Maher D. Ending infectious diseases in the era of the Sustainable Development Goals. Porto Biomed J. 2017;2(5):140–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbj.2017.08.001
Soofi K, Khanjani N, Kamiabi F. The Challenges of the Malaria Elimination Program in the South East of Iran, a Qualitative Study. J Arthropod Borne Dis. 2018;13(1):94.
World Health Organization & Global Malaria Programme. Malaria elimination: a field manual for low and moderate endemic countries. 2007; 85p. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/43796
Vatandoost H, Raeisi A, Saghafipour A, Nikpour F, Nejati J. Malaria situation in Iran: 2002–2017. Malar J. 2019;18:200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2836-5
Schapira A, Zaim M, Raeisi A, Ranjbar M, Kolifarhood G, Nikpour F, et al. History of the successful struggle against malaria in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran (THR): Ministry of Health and Medical Education‐Center for Disease Control, 1st ed, Neekpey, 2018. Printed in Iran, Shayan gostar. Available from: https://endmalaria.org/sites/default/files/Iran%20Story%20new%2026_Sep_2018_GF.pdf
World Health Organization. World Malaria Report, 2022. 2022 https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/reports/world-malaria-report-2022
World Health Organization. World Malaria Report, 2023. 2023 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240086173 Accessed 30 Nov 2023
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Larval source management and other vector control interventions. 2024 https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/php/public‐health‐strategy/larval‐management.html?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/malaria_worldwide/reduction/vector_control.html Accessed 24 Jun 2024.
World Health Organization. Framework for a national plan for monitoring and management of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241512138 Accessed 31 Dec 2016.
Carter TE, Yared S, Gebresilassie A, Bonnell V, Damodaran B, Lopez K, et al. First detection of Anopheles stephensi Liston, 1901 (Diptera: culicidae) in Ethiopia using molecular and morphological approaches. Acta Trop. 2018;188:180–186.
Hanafi‐Bojd AA, Azari‐Hamidian S, Vatandoost H, Charrahy Z. Spatio‐temporal distribution of malaria vectors (Diptera: Culicidae) across different climatic zones of Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2011;4(6):498–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1995-7645(11)60134-X
Faulde MK, Rueda LM, Khaireh BA. First record of the Asian malaria vector Anopheles stephensi and its possible role in the resurgence of malaria in Djibouti, Horn of Africa. Acta Trop. 2014;139:39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.06.016 Epub 2014 Jul 5.
Abubakr M, Sami H, Mahdi I, Altahir O, Abdelbagi H, Mohamed NS, et al. The phylodynamic and spread of the invasive Asian malaria vectors, Anopheles stephensi, in Sudan. Biology (Basel). 2022;11(3):409. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11030409
Allan R, Weetman D, Sauskojus H, Budge S, Hawail TB, Baheshm Y. Confirmation of the presence of Anopheles stephensi among internally displaced people's camps and host communities in Aden city, Yemen. Malar J. 2023;22(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04427-9
Ochomo EO, Milanoi S, Abong'o B, Onyango B, Muchoki M, Omoke D, et al. Detection of Anopheles stephensi Mosquitoes by Molecular Surveillance, Kenya. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29(12):2498–2508. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2912.230637.
World Health Organization. Vector alert: Anopheles stephensi invasion and spread in Africa and Sri Lanka: World Health Organization; 2022. license: CC BY‐NC‐SA 3.0 IGO Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240067714
World Health Organization. Partners convening: a regional response to the invasion of Anopheles stephensi in Africa: meeting report, 8–10 march 2023a. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240075535 Accessed 16 Jun 2023.
Enayati A, Hanafi‐Bojd AA, Sedaghat MM, Zaim M, Hemingway J. Evolution of insecticide resistance and its mechanisms in Anopheles stephensi in the WHO eastern Mediterranean region. Malar J. 2020;19(1):258. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03335-0
Gorouhi MA, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Raeisi A, Enayati AA, Mirhendi H, et al. Current susceptibility status of Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae) to different Imagicides in a Malarious area, southeastern of Iran. J Arthropod Borne Dis. 2016;10(4):493–500.
Abbasi M, Hanafi‐Bojd AA, Yaghoobi‐Ershadi MR, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Hazratian T, et al. Resistance status of main malaria vector, Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae) to insecticides in a malaria endemic area, southern Iran. Asian Pacific J Trop Med. 2019;12(1):43–48. https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-7645.250344
al‐Eryani SM, Irish SR, Carter TE, Lenhart A, Aljasari A, Montoya LF, et al. Public health impact of the spread of Anopheles stephensi in the WHO eastern Mediterranean region countries in horn of Africa and Yemen: need for integrated vector surveillance and control. Malar J. 2023;22(1):187. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04545-y
The Innovative Vector Control Consortium. Actellic®300CS Fact Sheet. 2023 https://www.ivcc.com/market-access/actellic-300cs/
Oxborough RM, Kitau J, Jones R, Matowo J, Mosha FW, Rowland MW. Long‐lasting control of anopheles arabiensis by a single spray application of micro‐micro‐encapsulated pirimiphos‐methyl (Actellic®300CS). Malar J. 2014;13:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-37
World Health Organization. Report of the sixteenth WHOPES working group meeting: review of: Pirimiphos‐MethyL 300 CS, Chlorfenapyr 240 SC, deltamethrin 62.5 SC‐PE, Duranet LN, Netprotect LN, Yahe LN, Spinosad 83.3 monolayer DT, Spinosad 25 extended release GR, control of neglected tropical diseases who pesticide evaluation scheme. 2013. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506304 Accessed 11 Nov 2013.
World Health Organization. WHO specifications and evaluations for public health pesticides: Lambdacyhalothrin. 2015. 2018. Available from: https://extranet.who.int/prequal/vector-control-products/icon-10-cs-irs
World Health Organization. Updated WHO guidance for controlling vector‐borne diseases through indoor residual spraying. 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/15‐02‐2024‐updated‐who‐guidance‐for‐controlling‐vector‐borne‐diseases‐through‐indoor‐residual‐spraying Accessed 15 Feb 2024.
World Health Organization. Cyhalothrin and lambda‐cyhalothrin‐health and safety guide. 1990 http://www.inchem.org/documents/hsg/hsg/hsg038.htm Accessed 16 Jun 2012
World Health Organization, Report of the tenth WHOPES working group meeting: review of: Spinosad 0.5% gr & 12% SC lambda‐cyhalothrin 10% SC K‐OTAB 1‐2‐3 interceptor, control of neglected tropical diseases who pesticide evaluation scheme, 2007. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-cds-ntd-whopes-2007.1 Accessed 11 Feb 2007
World Health Organization. Guidelines for testing mosquito adulticides for indoor residual spraying and treatment of mosquito nets. WHO/CDS/NTD/WHOPES/GCDP/2006.3. Geneva: WHO Pesticide Evaluation Scheme; 2006.
Census of the Islamic Republic of Iran, AMAR (in Persian). The statistical Center of Iran. p. 22. Archived from the original (excel) on 5 may 2022. Retrieved 19 December 2022.
Spark W. Climate and average weather year round in Bandar Abbas. 2023 Available from: https://weatherspark.com/y/105552/Average-Weather-in-Bandar-Abbas-Iran-Year-Round
Atlas W. Climate and monthly weather forecast Bandar Abbas, Iran. 2023 Available from: https://www.weather-atlas.com/en/iran/bandar-abbas-climate
World Health Organization. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vector mosquitoes. 2nd ed. 2018;55. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/250677/9789241511575‐eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
World Health Organization. Manual for monitoring insecticide resistance in mosquito vectors and selecting appropriate interventions. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022 https://apps. who.int/iris/handle/10665/356964
World Health Organization. Guidelines for testing mosquito adulticides for indoor residual spraying and treatment of mosquito nets. Who/CDS/NTD/WHOPES/GCDP/2006.3. Geneva: WHO Pesticide Evaluation Scheme; 2006.
World Health Organization. Indoor residual spraying. An operational manual for indoor residual spraying (IRS) for malaria transmission control and elimination. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2015 https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/177242/9789241508940_eng.pdf
Zaim M. Malaria control in Iran–present and future. J Am Mosq Contr Assoc. 1987;3(3):392–396.
World Health Organization. Global vector control response 2017–2030. 2023 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241512978 Accessed 2 Oct 2017
World Health Organization. Global report on insecticide resistance in malaria vectors: 2010–2016. 2018 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241514057
Teshome A, Erko B, Golassa L, Yohannes G, Irish SR, Zohdy S, et al. Resistance of Anopheles stephensi to selected insecticides used for indoor residual spraying and long‐lasting insecticidal nets in Ethiopia. Malar J. 2023;22(1):218. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04649-5
Yared S, Gebressielasie A, Damodaran L, Bonnell V, Lopez K, Janies D, et al. Insecticide resistance in Anopheles stephensi in Somali region, eastern Ethiopia. Malar J. 2020;19(1):180. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.18020/v2
Agossa FR, Padonou GG, Koukpo CZ, Zola‐Sahossi J, Azondekon R, Akuoko OK, et al. Efficacy of a novel mode of action of an indoor residual spraying product, SumiShield® 50WG against susceptible and resistant populations of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) in Benin, West Africa. Parasites Vectors. 2018;11(1):293. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2869-6 Epub 2018 May 12.
Haji KA, Thawer NG, Khatib BO, Mcha JH, Rashid A, Ali AS, et al. Efficacy, persistence and vector susceptibility to pirimiphos‐methyl (Actellic®300CS) insecticide for indoor residual spraying in Zanzibar. Parasites Vectors. 2015;9(8):628. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1239-x
Mutagahywa J, Ijumba JN, Pratap HB, Molteni F, Mugarula FE, Magesa SM, et al. The impact of different sprayable surfaces on the effectiveness of indoor residual spraying using a micro encapsulated formulation of lambda‐cyhalothrin against Anopheles gambiae s.s. Parasits Vectors. 2015;8:203. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0795-4
Raghavendra K, Ghosh SK, Eapen A, Tiwari SN, Satyanarayan TS, Ravindran J, et al. Field evaluation of lambda‐cyhalothrin (ICON 10 CS) indoor residual spraying against Anopheles culicifacies in India. Vector Borne Dis. 2011;48(2):18–26.
Vatandoost H, Abai MR, Abbasi M, Shaeghi M, Abtahi M, Rafie F. Designing of a laboratory model for evaluation of the residual effects of deltamethrin (K‐othrine WP 5%) on different surfaces against malaria vector, Anopheles stephensi (diptera: culicidae). J Vector Borne Dis. 2009;46(4):261–267.