Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Aged over and under 65 Years (ENANTIA-65).

Filgotinib lipid profile real life rheumatoid arthritis

Journal

Journal of personalized medicine
ISSN: 2075-4426
Titre abrégé: J Pers Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101602269

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 03 05 2024
revised: 19 06 2024
accepted: 26 06 2024
medline: 27 7 2024
pubmed: 27 7 2024
entrez: 27 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

According to recent data, the age of patients could represent an important risk factor for MACE (major cardiovascular events), cancer, and VTE (venous thromboembolism) during treatment with JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis. We decided to analyze the population involved in the ReLiFiRa study by identifying two groups of patients: 65 years or more and less than 65 years of age, evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of 200 mg of Filgotinib daily. Of the 120 ReLiFiRa patients, 54 were younger than 65 years old and 66 patients were 65 years old or older. The data of efficacy and tolerability of treatment with FIL 200 mg daily for 6 months were evaluated. After six months of treatment, FIL was effective in both age groups. In both groups, the median values of steroid DAS28, CDAI, ERS, PCR, tender joints, swollen joints, VAS, HAQ, PGA patients, and PGA physicians were reduced with a statistically significant difference comparing these values with the baseline values. The difference in age did not impact the effectiveness of the drug. The lipid profile data also did not demonstrate significant differences between the two age groups; however, the comparison between younger vs. older patients' populations regarding the total cholesterol/HDL ratio and LDL/HDL ratio shows a statistically significant difference: total cholesterol/HDL 3.4 (2.12-3.66) vs. 3.64 (3.36-4.13) After six months of treatment with FIL, the older population group showed a higher level of LDL and a lower level of HDL compared to younger patients. The atherogenic index and coronary risk index are higher in patients aged ≥ 65 years, but interestingly, there were no differences when comparing the 6-month data to baseline values. This condition highlights the impact of typical risk factors that act independently of treatment with Filgotinib.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
According to recent data, the age of patients could represent an important risk factor for MACE (major cardiovascular events), cancer, and VTE (venous thromboembolism) during treatment with JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis. We decided to analyze the population involved in the ReLiFiRa study by identifying two groups of patients: 65 years or more and less than 65 years of age, evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of 200 mg of Filgotinib daily.
METHODS METHODS
Of the 120 ReLiFiRa patients, 54 were younger than 65 years old and 66 patients were 65 years old or older. The data of efficacy and tolerability of treatment with FIL 200 mg daily for 6 months were evaluated.
RESULTS RESULTS
After six months of treatment, FIL was effective in both age groups. In both groups, the median values of steroid DAS28, CDAI, ERS, PCR, tender joints, swollen joints, VAS, HAQ, PGA patients, and PGA physicians were reduced with a statistically significant difference comparing these values with the baseline values. The difference in age did not impact the effectiveness of the drug. The lipid profile data also did not demonstrate significant differences between the two age groups; however, the comparison between younger vs. older patients' populations regarding the total cholesterol/HDL ratio and LDL/HDL ratio shows a statistically significant difference: total cholesterol/HDL 3.4 (2.12-3.66) vs. 3.64 (3.36-4.13)
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
After six months of treatment with FIL, the older population group showed a higher level of LDL and a lower level of HDL compared to younger patients. The atherogenic index and coronary risk index are higher in patients aged ≥ 65 years, but interestingly, there were no differences when comparing the 6-month data to baseline values. This condition highlights the impact of typical risk factors that act independently of treatment with Filgotinib.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39063966
pii: jpm14070712
doi: 10.3390/jpm14070712
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Maurizio Benucci (M)

Rheumatology Unit, S. Giovanni di Dio Hospital, 50143 Florence, Italy.

Marco Bardelli (M)

Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.

Massimiliano Cazzato (M)

Unit of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.

Francesca Bartoli (F)

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.

Arianna Damiani (A)

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.

Francesca Li Gobbi (F)

Rheumatology Unit, S. Giovanni di Dio Hospital, 50143 Florence, Italy.

Francesca Bandinelli (F)

Rheumatology Unit, S. Giovanni di Dio Hospital, 50143 Florence, Italy.

Anna Panaccione (A)

Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, Santa Maria General Hospital, 05100 Terni, Italy.

Luca Di Cato (L)

Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, Santa Maria General Hospital, 05100 Terni, Italy.

Laura Niccoli (L)

Division of Rheumatology, Prato Hospital, 59100 Prato, Italy.

Bruno Frediani (B)

Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.

Marta Mosca (M)

Unit of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.

Serena Guiducci (S)

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.

Fabrizio Cantini (F)

Division of Rheumatology, Prato Hospital, 59100 Prato, Italy.

Classifications MeSH