Polyp size is associated with colorectal cancer death across histologic polyp subtypes: a retrospective study of a screening colonoscopy registry.


Journal

Endoscopy
ISSN: 1438-8812
Titre abrégé: Endoscopy
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0215166

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Jun 2024
Historique:
medline: 28 6 2024
pubmed: 28 6 2024
entrez: 27 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Surveillance colonoscopy after polyps have been detected at screening aims to reduce the risk for subsequent colorectal cancer, so-called post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC). Inconsistencies exist as to whether the risk should be stratified by histologic subtype. We aimed to compare the risk for PCCRC mortality in screening participants with sessile serrated lesions (SSLs)/traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs), hyperplastic polyps (HPPs), or conventional adenomas. Screening colonoscopy registry data were linked to death registry data between 2010 and 2022. We assessed the association of PCCRC death after a diagnosis of SSL/TSA, conventional adenoma, or HPP by Cox regression, and stratified by polyp size ≥10 and <10 mm. 383,801 participants were included in the analysis. There were 1490 HPPs ≥10 mm (2.6%), compared with 1853 SSL/TSAs (19.6%) and 10,960 conventional adenomas (12.9%). When adjusted for polyp location, the association of polyp size ≥10 mm with PCCRC death was of similar magnitude in participants with conventional adenomas (hazard ratio [HR] 3.68, 95%CI 2.49-5.44), SSL/TSAs (HR 2.55, 95%CI 1.13-5.72), and HPPs (HR 5.01, 95%CI 2.45-10.22). Participants with HPPs mostly died of tumors in the distal colon (54.1%; n = 20), while participants with SSL/TSAs more frequently died of proximal tumors (33.3%; n = 3). Across all histologic types, participants with polyps ≥10 mm had at least a two-fold increase in the likelihood of PCCRC death compared with those with polyps <10 mm. These data suggest that size, rather than histologic subtype, should be a determinant for risk stratification after screening colonoscopy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Surveillance colonoscopy after polyps have been detected at screening aims to reduce the risk for subsequent colorectal cancer, so-called post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC). Inconsistencies exist as to whether the risk should be stratified by histologic subtype. We aimed to compare the risk for PCCRC mortality in screening participants with sessile serrated lesions (SSLs)/traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs), hyperplastic polyps (HPPs), or conventional adenomas.
METHODS METHODS
Screening colonoscopy registry data were linked to death registry data between 2010 and 2022. We assessed the association of PCCRC death after a diagnosis of SSL/TSA, conventional adenoma, or HPP by Cox regression, and stratified by polyp size ≥10 and <10 mm.
RESULTS RESULTS
383,801 participants were included in the analysis. There were 1490 HPPs ≥10 mm (2.6%), compared with 1853 SSL/TSAs (19.6%) and 10,960 conventional adenomas (12.9%). When adjusted for polyp location, the association of polyp size ≥10 mm with PCCRC death was of similar magnitude in participants with conventional adenomas (hazard ratio [HR] 3.68, 95%CI 2.49-5.44), SSL/TSAs (HR 2.55, 95%CI 1.13-5.72), and HPPs (HR 5.01, 95%CI 2.45-10.22). Participants with HPPs mostly died of tumors in the distal colon (54.1%; n = 20), while participants with SSL/TSAs more frequently died of proximal tumors (33.3%; n = 3).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Across all histologic types, participants with polyps ≥10 mm had at least a two-fold increase in the likelihood of PCCRC death compared with those with polyps <10 mm. These data suggest that size, rather than histologic subtype, should be a determinant for risk stratification after screening colonoscopy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38936414
doi: 10.1055/a-2339-0146
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Thieme. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

M. Trauner has been an advisor for Abbvie, Albireo, BiomX, Boehringer Ingelheim, Falk, Gilead, Genfit, Hightide, Intercept, Jannsen, MSD, Novartis, Phenex, Pliant, Regulus, Siemens, and Shire; has received speaker's fees from BMS, Falk Foundation, Gilead, Intercept, MSD, and Roche; travel grants from AbbVie, Falk Foundation, Gilead, Intercept, Janssen, and Roche; and grants/research support from Albireo, Alnylam, Cymabay, Falk Pharma, Gilead, Intercept, MSD, Madrigal, Takeda, and UltraGenyx. The Medical Universities of Graz and Vienna have filed patents on medical use of norUDCA and M. Trauner is listed as a co-inventor. J. Zessner-Spitzenberg, E. Waldmann, L.-M. Rockenbauer, A. Demschik, D. Penz, and M. Ferlitsch declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg (J)

Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Quality Assurance Working Group, Austrian Society for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vienna, Austria.

Elisabeth Waldmann (E)

Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Quality Assurance Working Group, Austrian Society for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vienna, Austria.

Lisa-Maria Rockenbauer (LM)

Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Quality Assurance Working Group, Austrian Society for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vienna, Austria.

Alexandra Demschik (A)

Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Quality Assurance Working Group, Austrian Society for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vienna, Austria.

Daniela Penz (D)

Department of Internal Medicine I, St. John of God Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

Michael Trauner (M)

Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Monika Ferlitsch (M)

Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Quality Assurance Working Group, Austrian Society for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vienna, Austria.

Classifications MeSH