Three levels of neural control contributing to performance-stabilizing synergies in multi-finger tasks.

hand hierarchical control motor unit referent coordinate spinal cord uncontrolled manifold

Journal

Neuroscience
ISSN: 1873-7544
Titre abrégé: Neuroscience
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7605074

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 04 12 2023
revised: 28 05 2024
accepted: 30 05 2024
medline: 6 6 2024
pubmed: 6 6 2024
entrez: 5 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

We tested a hypothesis on force-stabilizing synergies during four-finger accurate force production at three levels: (1) The level of the reciprocal and coactivation commands, estimated as the referent coordinate and apparent stiffness of all four fingers combined; (2) The level of individual finger forces; and (3) The level of firing of individual motor units (MU). Young, healthy participants performed accurate four-finger force production at a comfortable, non-fatiguing level under visual feedback on the total force magnitude. Mechanical reflections of the reciprocal and coactivation commands were estimated using small, smooth finger perturbations applied by the "inverse piano" device. Firing frequencies of motor units in the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC) were estimated using surface recording. Principal component analysis was used to identify robust MU groups (MU-modes) with parallel changes in the firing frequency. The framework of the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis was used to compute synergy indices in the spaces of referent coordinate and apparent stiffness, finger forces, and MU-mode magnitudes. Force-stabilizing synergies were seen at all three levels. They were present in the MU-mode spaces defined for MUs in FDS, in EDC, and pooled over both muscles. No effects of hand dominance were seen. The synergy indices defined at different levels of analysis showed no correlations across the participants. The findings are interpreted within the theory of control with spatial referent coordinates for the effectors. We conclude that force stabilization gets contributions from three levels of neural control, likely associated with cortical, subcortical, and spinal circuitry.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38838976
pii: S0306-4522(24)00254-9
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.05.044
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Anna Benamati (A)

Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Joseph M Ricotta (JM)

Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Sayan D De (SD)

Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Mark L Latash (ML)

Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. Electronic address: mll11@psu.edu.

Classifications MeSH