Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast; clinicopathologic profile and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy over a 15-year period.

Breast Cancer Lobular Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Journal

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)
ISSN: 1532-3080
Titre abrégé: Breast
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9213011

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 May 2024
Historique:
received: 11 09 2023
revised: 03 04 2024
accepted: 24 04 2024
medline: 16 5 2024
pubmed: 16 5 2024
entrez: 16 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for 5-15% of invasive breast cancers. Typical ILC is oestrogen receptor (ER) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative. Atypical biomarker profiles (ER- and HER2+, ER+ and HER2+ or triple negative) appear to differ from typical ILCs. This study compared subtypes of ILC in terms of clinical and pathological parameters, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) according to biomarker profile. All patients with ILC treated in a single centre from January 2005 to December 2020 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Clinicopathologic and outcome data was collected and analysed according to tumour biomarker profile. A total of 582 patients with ILC were treated. Typical ILC was observed in 89.2% (n = 519) and atypical in 10.8% (n = 63). Atypical ILCs were of a higher grade (35% grade 3 vs 9.6% grade 3, p < 0.001). A larger proportion of atypical ILC received NACT (31.7% vs 6.9% p < 0.001). Atypical ILCs showed a greater response to NACT (mean RCB (Residual Cancer Burden Score) 2.46 vs mean RCB 3.41, p = 0.0365), and higher pathological complete response rates (15% vs 0% p = 0.017). Despite this, overall 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was higher in patients with typical ILC (91% vs 83%, p = 0.001). Atypical ILCs have distinct characteristics. They are more frequently of a higher grade and demonstrate a superior response to NACT. Despite the latter, atypical ILCs have a worse 5-year DFS which should be taken into consideration in terms of prognostication and may assist patient selection for NACT.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38754140
pii: S0960-9776(24)00070-5
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103739
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103739

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

N P Quirke (NP)

UCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: nedquirke@gmail.com.

C Cullinane (C)

Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

M A Turk (MA)

UCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8, Dublin, Ireland.

N Shafique (N)

Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

D Evoy (D)

Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

J Geraghty (J)

Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

D McCartan (D)

Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

C Quinn (C)

Department of Pathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

J M Walshe (JM)

Department of Oncology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

E McDermott (E)

Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

C Rutherford (C)

Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

R S Prichard (RS)

Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Classifications MeSH