Enhanced recovery after chest wall resection and reconstruction: a clinical practice review.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
chest wall reconstruction
chest wall resection (CWR)
Journal
Journal of thoracic disease
ISSN: 2072-1439
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Dis
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101533916
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Apr 2024
30 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
07
06
2023
accepted:
29
01
2024
medline:
13
5
2024
pubmed:
13
5
2024
entrez:
13
5
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Since the late 1990s, and Henrik Kehlet's hypothesis that a reduction of the body's stress response to major surgeries could decrease postoperative morbidity, "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery" (ERAS) care pathways have been streamlined. They are now well accepted and considered standard in many surgical disciplines. Yet, to this day, there is no specific ERAS protocol for chest wall resections (CWRs), the removal of a full-thickness portion of the chest wall, including muscle, bone and possibly skin. This is most unfortunate because these are high-risk surgeries, which carry high morbidity rates. In this review, we propose an overview of the current key elements of the ERAS guidelines for thoracic surgery that might apply to CWRs. A successful ERAS pathway for CWR patients would entail, as is the standard approach, three parts: pre-, peri- and postoperative elements. Preoperative items would include specific information, targeted patient education, involvement of all members of the team, including the plastic surgeons, smoking cessation, dedicated nutrition and carbohydrate loading. Perioperative items would likely be standard for thoracotomy patients, namely carefully selective pre-anesthesia sedative medication only in some rare instances, low-molecular-weight heparin throughout, antibiotic prophylaxis, minimization of postoperative nausea and vomiting, avoidance of fluid overload and of urinary drainage. Postoperative elements would include early mobilization and feeding, swift discontinuation of intravenous fluid supply and chest tube removal as soon as safe. Optimal pain management throughout also appears to be critical to minimize the risk of respiratory complications. Together, all these items are achievable and may hold the key to successful introduction of ERAS pathways to the benefit of CWR patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38738262
doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-911
pii: jtd-16-04-2604
pmc: PMC11087605
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
2604-2612Informations de copyright
2024 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-911/coif). The series “Chest Wall Resections and Reconstructions” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. M.G. serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Journal of Thoracic Disease from February 2023 to January 2025. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.