Treatment of atopic dermatitis with upadacitinib: adcare single center experience.

Eczema Area and Severity Index Janus kinase inhibitors molecules atopic dermatitis drug efficacy and safety upadacitinib

Journal

Frontiers in medicine
ISSN: 2296-858X
Titre abrégé: Front Med (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648047

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 13 02 2024
accepted: 12 03 2024
medline: 2 5 2024
pubmed: 2 5 2024
entrez: 2 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The role of upadacitinib in the management of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis seems promising, but more data on its efficacy and safety are needed. This study endeavors to assess the practical impact and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, focusing on analyzing patient responses to the treatment. In this study, adult patients diagnosed with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis received upadacitinib at daily doses of 15 mg or 30 mg, as prescribed by their attending physicians. The therapeutic efficacy of upadacitinib was meticulously assessed using established clinical metrics. Simultaneously, a comprehensive safety assessment was conducted through monthly monitoring, including the evaluation of potential effects of upadacitinib intake on hepatic function, lipid profile, and hematopoiesis using the pertinent laboratory tests. Sixteen participants were enrolled in the study. At 1month follow-up, there was a significant reduction in the mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score to 18.8 points, which further increased to 24 points at the 4-month mark. Additionally, 9 participants (56%) demonstrated an EASI-50 response after 1 month of treatment, with this response increasing to 9 participants (90%) after 4 months. Furthermore, enhanced therapeutic responses were observed at 4 months, with 6 patients (38%) achieving an EASI-75 response at 1month and 8 patients (80%) achieving this milestone at the 4-month follow-up. This study highlights the potential of upadacitinib as an effective treatment option for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. While it demonstrates improved symptom management, close monitoring for potential adverse events, particularly infections and the known risks of Janus kinase inhibitors, is essential. Further research is essential to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38695023
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1385720
pmc: PMC11061355
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1385720

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Fomina, Mukhina, Mikhailova, Lebedkina, Sedova, Bobrikova, Elisyutina, Fedenko, Nurpeisov, Karaulov, Lysenko and Ensina.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Daria S Fomina (DS)

City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Moscow, Russia.
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Olga A Mukhina (OA)

City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Moscow, Russia.

Valeria I Mikhailova (VI)

City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Moscow, Russia.

Marina S Lebedkina (MS)

City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Moscow, Russia.

Elizaveta L Sedova (EL)

City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Moscow, Russia.

Elena N Bobrikova (EN)

City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Moscow, Russia.

Olga G Elisyutina (OG)

NRC Institute of Immunology FMBA of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russia.

Elena S Fedenko (ES)

NRC Institute of Immunology FMBA of Russia, Moscow, Russia.

Tair T Nurpeisov (TT)

Department of General Immunology, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University (KazNMU), Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Republican Allergy Center, Research Institute of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Almaty, Kazakhstan.

Alexander V Karaulov (AV)

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

Mar'yana A Lysenko (MA)

City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Moscow, Russia.
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.

Luis Felipe C Ensina (LFC)

Division of Allergy, Immunology, Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Classifications MeSH