Sequential RAS mutations evaluation in cell-free DNA of patients with tissue RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the PERSEIDA (Cohort 2) study.
RAS
Liquid biopsies
ctDNA
mCRC
Journal
Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico
ISSN: 1699-3055
Titre abrégé: Clin Transl Oncol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101247119
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Apr 2024
20 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
01
03
2024
accepted:
25
03
2024
medline:
20
4
2024
pubmed:
20
4
2024
entrez:
20
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
RAS (KRAS/NRAS) mutational status on a tumor biopsy is mandatory to guide the best treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Determining the RAS mutational status by tumor-tissue biopsy is essential in guiding the optimal treatment decision for mCRC. RAS mutations are negative predictive factors for the use of EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis enables minimally invasive monitoring of tumor evolution. PERSEIDA was an observational, prospective study assessing cfDNA RAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations (using Idylla™) in first-line mCRC, RAS wild-type (baseline tumor-tissue biopsy) patients (cohort 2). Plasma samples were collected before first-line treatment, after 20 ± 2 weeks, and at disease progression. 117 patients were included (103 received panitumumab + chemotherapy as first-line treatment). At baseline, 7 (6.8%) patients had RAS mutations, 4 (3.9%) BRAF mutations and no EGFR mutations were detected (cfDNA, panitumumab + chemotherapy subpopulation [panitumumab + Ch]). The baseline RAS mutational status concordance between tissue and liquid biopsies was 94.0% (93.2%, panitumumab + Ch). At 20 weeks, only one patient in the study (included in the panitumumab + Ch) had an emerging cfDNA RAS mutation. No emerging BRAF or EGFR mutations were reported. At disease progression, 6 patients had emergent mutations not present at baseline (RAS conversion rate: 13.3% [6/45]; 15.0% [6/40], panitumumab + Ch). The concordance rate between liquid and solid biopsies at baseline was very high, as previously reported, while our results suggest a considerable emergence of RAS mutations during disease progression. Thus, the dynamics of the genomic landscape in ctDNA may provide relevant information for the management of mCRC patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38642257
doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03487-4
pii: 10.1007/s12094-024-03487-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Cervantes A, Adam R, Roselló S, Arnold D, Normanno N, Taïeb J, et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.003
pubmed: 37951473
Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, Sobrero A, Van Krieken JH, Aderka D, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw235 .
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw235
pubmed: 27573561
pmcid: 5091322
Montagut C, Dalmases A, Bellosillo B, Crespo M, Pairet S, Iglesias M, et al. Identification of a mutation in the extracellular domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor conferring cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer. Nat Med. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2609 .
doi: 10.1038/nm.2609
pubmed: 22270724
Maurel J, Alonso V, Escudero P, Fernández-Martos C, Salud A, Méndez M, et al. Clinical impact of circulating tumor RAS and BRAF mutation dynamics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy plus anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. JCO Precis Oncol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.18.00289 .
doi: 10.1200/PO.18.00289
pubmed: 35100697
Zhou J, Ji Q, Li Q. Resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer: underlying mechanisms and reversal strategies. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-021-02130-2 .
doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-02130-2
pubmed: 34972530
pmcid: 8719399
Takayama Y, Suzuki K, Muto Y, Ichida K, Fukui T, Kakizawa N, et al. Monitoring circulating tumor DNA revealed dynamic changes in KRAS status in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2018. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.25309 .
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25309
pubmed: 29849949
pmcid: 5966256
Diaz LA, Williams R, Wu J, Kinde I, Hecht JR, Berlin J, et al. The molecular evolution of acquired resistance to targeted EGFR blockade in colorectal cancers. Nature. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11219 .
doi: 10.1038/nature11219
pubmed: 23123848
pmcid: 3436069
Diehl F, Schmidt K, Choti MA, Romans K, Goodman S, Li M, et al. Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. Nat Med. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.1789 .
doi: 10.1038/nm.1789
pubmed: 18670422
Vidal J, Fernández-Rodríguez MC, Casadevall D, Garcia-Alfonso P, Páez D, Guix M, et al. Liquid biopsy detects early molecular response and predicts benefit to first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: PLATFORM-B study. Clin Cancer Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1696 .
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1696
pubmed: 36749875
pmcid: 10870115
Yamada T, Matsuda A, Takahashi G, Iwai T, Takeda K, Ueda K, et al. Emerging RAS, BRAF, and EGFR mutations in cell-free DNA of metastatic colorectal patients are associated with both primary and secondary resistance to first-line anti-EGFR therapy. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-020-01691-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01691-0
pubmed: 33219460
pmcid: 7895797
Valladares-Ayerbes M, Garcia-Alfonso P, Muñoz Luengo J, Pimentel Caceres PP, Castillo Trujillo OA, Vidal-Tocino R, et al. Evolution of RAS mutations in cell-free DNA of patients with tissue RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line treatment: the PERSEIDA study. Cancers. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14246075 .
doi: 10.3390/cancers14246075
pubmed: 36551560
pmcid: 9776941
Biocartis. Technical sheet Idylla
Diehl F, Li M, He Y, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Dressman D. BEAMing: single-molecule PCR on microparticles in water-in-oil emulsions. Nat Methods. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth898 .
doi: 10.1038/nmeth898
pubmed: 16791214
AVENIO ctDNA expanded kits. https://sequencing.roche.com/global/en/products/group/avenio-ctdna-expanded-kits.html .
Peeters M, Kafatos G, Taylor A, Gastanaga VM, Oliner KS, Hechmati G, et al. Prevalence of RAS mutations and individual variation patterns among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Cancer. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.017 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.017
pubmed: 26049686
Huynh MV, Hobbs GA, Schaefer A, Pierobon M, Carey LM, Diehl JN, et al. Functional and biological heterogeneity of KRASQ61 mutations. Sci Signal. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.abn2694 .
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.abn2694
pubmed: 35944066
pmcid: 9534304
Parseghian CM, Sun R, Woods M, Napolitano S, Lee HM, Alshenaifi J, et al. Resistance mechanisms to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy in RAS/RAF wild-type colorectal cancer vary by regimen and line of therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.01423 .
doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01423
pubmed: 36351210
Gazzaniga P, Raimondi C, Urbano F, Cortesi E. EGFR inhibitor as second-line therapy in a patient with mutant RAS metastatic colorectal cancer: circulating tumor DNA to personalize treatment. JCO Precis Oncol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.17.00277 .
doi: 10.1200/PO.17.00277
pubmed: 35135115
Bettegowda C, Sausen M, Leary RJ, Kinde I, Wang Y, Agrawal N, et al. Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies. Sci Transl Med. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3007094 .
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007094
pubmed: 25122639
pmcid: 4399712
Arisi MF, Dotan E, Fernandez SV. Circulating tumor DNA in precision oncology and its applications in colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084441 .
doi: 10.3390/ijms23084441
pubmed: 36362235
pmcid: 9654348
Heitzer E, Haque IS, Roberts CES, Speicher MR. Current and future perspectives of liquid biopsies in genomics-driven oncology. Nat Rev Genet. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-018-0071-5 .
doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0071-5
pubmed: 30410101
Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T, Kiani A, Kaiser F, Al-Batran S-E, et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer: final survival and per-protocol analysis of FIRE-3, a randomised clinical trial. Br J Cancer. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/10.1038/s41416-020-01140-9 .
doi: 10.1038/10.1038/s41416-020-01140-9
pubmed: 34112951
pmcid: 8329067
Holch JW, Ricard I, Stintzing S, Modest DP, Heinemann V. The relevance of primary tumour location in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of first-line clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.10.007 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.10.007
pubmed: 28843184
Arnold D, Lueza B, Douillard J-Y, Peeters M, Lenz H-J, Venook A, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of primary tumour side in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy and EGFR directed antibodies in six randomised trials. Ann Oncol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx175 .
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx175
pubmed: 28950290
pmcid: 5834052
Franczak C, Witz A, Geoffroy K, Demange J, Rouyer M, Husson M, et al. Evaluation of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations detection in plasma using an automated system for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PLoS ONE. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227294 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227294
pubmed: 31940389
pmcid: 6961936
Wang F, Huang Y-S, Wu H-X, Wang Z-X, Jin Y, Yao Y-C, et al. Genomic temporal heterogeneity of circulating tumour DNA in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer under first-line treatment. Gut. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324852 .
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324852
pubmed: 37286230
Pietrantonio F, Cremolini C, Petrelli F, Di Bartolomeo M, Loupakis F, Maggi C, et al. First-line anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in panRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.05.016 .
doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.05.016
pubmed: 26481953
Janssens K, Fransen E, Rolfo CD, Lybaert W, Demey W, Decaestecker J, et al. 468P PANIB 20139173: randomized, multicentre phase II trial comparing fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) plus panitumumab versus FOLFOX plus bevacizumab in patients with previously untreated, RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Ann Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.579 .
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.579