Pharmacist-only supply of nicotine vaping products: proposing an alternative regulatory model for Australia.
Cessation
Electronic nicotine delivery devices
Harm Reduction
Nicotine
Public policy
Journal
Tobacco control
ISSN: 1468-3318
Titre abrégé: Tob Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9209612
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Apr 2024
10 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
25
09
2023
accepted:
03
04
2024
medline:
11
4
2024
pubmed:
11
4
2024
entrez:
10
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Regulation of nicotine vaping products (NVPs) is an ongoing challenge across the world. Australia currently has a globally unique NVP regulatory model that requires a medical prescription to purchase and use NVPs, with further restrictions in progress in response to evidence of widespread illicit NVP sales. Against this background, we examine the new measures and consider a modification of the model to pharmacist-only supply as an option for increasing access to NVPs for smoking cessation, while retaining health practitioner oversight of supply. We describe the strengths and challenges of implementing a pharmacist-only NVP supply option in Australia. Compared with the current prescription-only model, pharmacist-only supply could increase access to a lower exposure nicotine product in a highly regulated therapeutic context while addressing youth access and purchasing for non-therapeutic use, reduce demand for illicit products for smoking cessation purposes and avoid overburdening medical services with consultations to obtain NVP prescriptions. This approach can also accommodate current government goals such as eliminating NVP advertising, youth-focused branding and supply from grocery and convenience stores.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38599788
pii: tc-2023-058414
doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058414
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Editorial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: No, there are no competing interests.