[RECOMA study: evaluation of quality of life and satisfaction after immediate or delayed breast reconstructio].

Étude RECOMA : évaluation de la qualité de vie et de la satisfaction après reconstruction mammaire immédiate ou différée.
BREAST-Q Breast cancer Breast reconstruction Cancer du sein Mastectomie Mastectomy Quality of life Reconstruction mammaire qualité́ de vie

Journal

Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie
ISSN: 2468-7189
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101693805

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 08 11 2023
revised: 12 03 2024
accepted: 13 03 2024
medline: 22 3 2024
pubmed: 22 3 2024
entrez: 21 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy, whether immediate or delayed, is an integral part of the overall management of breast cancer. However, up to 40% of reconstructed patients are not satisfied with the aesthetic result. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate satisfaction and quality of life according to the reconstruction techniques used in our center. The secondary objectives were to identify the parameters that could influence satisfaction and quality of life after surgery, to list the main complications, and the number of operations required to consider the reconstruction process as completed. A retrospective monocentric study, RECOMA, was carried out at the CHRU Minjoz in Besançon. All patients who underwent immediate or delayed breast reconstruction between 2010 and 2021 were contacted by post or e-mail and asked to complete the standardized BREAST Q postoperative module. Of 508 patients contacted, 149 were included. Reconstructed patients reported satisfaction, but also "average" quality of physical and psychological sexual life. Only the surgeon's assessment was rated as "good". There was no significant difference in satisfaction and quality of life depending on the reconstruction method chosen. On the other hand, patients who underwent nipple areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction had a significantly higher psychic quality of life score (p=0.02). In addition, a significant decrease in physical satisfaction was observed over time(p=0.049). An average of 2.4 operations was required to consider breast reconstruction complete. In our opinion, breast reconstruction is an essential procedure to be considered as soon as the indication for mastectomy is given, but it is a process that requires the patient to be prepared for a result that may be weaker than expected, may require several operations, and may be complicated.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38513889
pii: S2468-7189(24)00089-8
doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2024.03.006
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

English Abstract Journal Article

Langues

fre

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Thibaud Boudry (T)

Département de chirurgie Gynécologie et obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Jean Minjoz, Université de Franche-Comté, 3, boulevard Alexander-Fleming, 25030 Besançon cedex, France. Electronic address: thibaud.boudry@gmail.com.

Yolande Maisonnette Escot (YM)

Département de chirurgie Gynécologie et obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Jean Minjoz, Université de Franche-Comté, 3, boulevard Alexander-Fleming, 25030 Besançon cedex, France.

Isabelle Pluvy (I)

Département de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, chirurgie plastique, esthétique et reconstructrice, chirurgie de la main, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Jean Minjoz, Université de Franche-Comté, 3, boulevard Alexander-Fleming, 25030 Besançon cedex, France; Unité de recherche Nanomedicine Lab, Imagery & Therapeutics EA4662, université de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, 16 route de Gray, 25030 Besançon, France.

Damien Feuvrier (D)

Département de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, chirurgie plastique, esthétique et reconstructrice, chirurgie de la main, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Jean Minjoz, Université de Franche-Comté, 3, boulevard Alexander-Fleming, 25030 Besançon cedex, France.

Gilles Houvenaeghel (G)

Institut Paoli Calmettes & CRCM, 232, Bd de Sainte Marguerite, 13009 Marseille: Université Aix-Marseille, Faculté de Médecine Timone, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13005 Marseille, France.

Rajeev Ramanah (R)

Département de chirurgie Gynécologie et obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Jean Minjoz, Université de Franche-Comté, 3, boulevard Alexander-Fleming, 25030 Besançon cedex, France; Unité de recherche Nanomedicine Lab, Imagery & Therapeutics EA4662, université de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, 16 route de Gray, 25030 Besançon, France.

Classifications MeSH