Flow-controlled ventilation decreases mechanical power in postoperative ICU patients.
Electrical impedance tomography
FCV
Flow-controlled ventilation
ICU
Mechanical power
Journal
Intensive care medicine experimental
ISSN: 2197-425X
Titre abrégé: Intensive Care Med Exp
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101645149
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Mar 2024
19 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
27
10
2023
accepted:
08
03
2024
medline:
19
3
2024
pubmed:
19
3
2024
entrez:
19
3
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mechanical power (MP) is the energy delivered by the ventilator to the respiratory system and combines factors related to the development of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a new ventilation mode using a constant low flow during both inspiration and expiration, which is hypothesized to lower the MP and to improve ventilation homogeneity. Data demonstrating these effects are scarce, since previous studies comparing FCV with conventional controlled ventilation modes in ICU patients suffer from important methodological concerns. This study aims to assess the difference in MP between FCV and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV). Secondary aims were to explore the effect of FCV in terms of minute volume, ventilation distribution and homogeneity, and gas exchange. This is a physiological study in post-cardiothoracic surgery patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the ICU. During PCV at baseline and 90 min of FCV, intratracheal pressure, airway flow and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) were measured continuously, and hemodynamics and venous and arterial blood gases were obtained repeatedly. Pressure-volume loops were constructed for the calculation of the MP. In 10 patients, optimized FCV versus PCV resulted in a lower MP (7.7 vs. 11.0 J/min; p = 0.004). Although FCV did not increase overall ventilation homogeneity, it did lead to an improved ventilation of the dependent lung regions. A stable gas exchange at lower minute volumes was obtained. FCV resulted in a lower MP and improved ventilation of the dependent lung regions in post-cardiothoracic surgery patients on the ICU. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05644418. Registered 1 December 2022, retrospectively registered.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Mechanical power (MP) is the energy delivered by the ventilator to the respiratory system and combines factors related to the development of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a new ventilation mode using a constant low flow during both inspiration and expiration, which is hypothesized to lower the MP and to improve ventilation homogeneity. Data demonstrating these effects are scarce, since previous studies comparing FCV with conventional controlled ventilation modes in ICU patients suffer from important methodological concerns.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to assess the difference in MP between FCV and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV). Secondary aims were to explore the effect of FCV in terms of minute volume, ventilation distribution and homogeneity, and gas exchange.
METHODS
METHODS
This is a physiological study in post-cardiothoracic surgery patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the ICU. During PCV at baseline and 90 min of FCV, intratracheal pressure, airway flow and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) were measured continuously, and hemodynamics and venous and arterial blood gases were obtained repeatedly. Pressure-volume loops were constructed for the calculation of the MP.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In 10 patients, optimized FCV versus PCV resulted in a lower MP (7.7 vs. 11.0 J/min; p = 0.004). Although FCV did not increase overall ventilation homogeneity, it did lead to an improved ventilation of the dependent lung regions. A stable gas exchange at lower minute volumes was obtained.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
FCV resulted in a lower MP and improved ventilation of the dependent lung regions in post-cardiothoracic surgery patients on the ICU. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05644418. Registered 1 December 2022, retrospectively registered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38502268
doi: 10.1186/s40635-024-00616-9
pii: 10.1186/s40635-024-00616-9
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05644418']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
30Subventions
Organisme : HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
ID : 961787
Organisme : Ventinova
ID : 961787
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Costa E, Slutsky A, Brochard L, Brower R, Serpa-Neto A, Cavalcanti A et al (2021) Ventilatory variables and mechanical power in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 204(3):303–311
doi: 10.1164/rccm.202009-3467OC
pubmed: 33784486
Cressoni M, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, Massari D, Algieri I, Amini M et al (2016) Mechanical power and development of ventilator-induced lung injury. Anesthesiology 124(5):1100–1108
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001056
pubmed: 26872367
Kollisch-Singule M, Emr B, Smith B, Ruiz C, Roy S, Meng Q et al (2014) Airway pressure release ventilation reduces conducting airway micro-strain in lung injury. J Am Coll Surg 219(5):968–976
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.09.011
pubmed: 25440027
pmcid: 4350231
Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM (2013) Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med 369(22):2126–2136
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208707
pubmed: 24283226
Barnes T, van Asseldonk D, Enk D (2018) Minimisation of dissipated energy in the airways during mechanical ventilation by using constant inspiratory and expiratory flows—flow-controlled ventilation (FCV). Med Hypotheses 121:167–176
doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2018.09.038
pubmed: 30396474
Barnes TE, Enk D (2018) Ventilation for low dissipated energy achieved using flow control during both inspiration and expiration. Trends Anaesthe Crit Care 1(1):1–8
Schmidt J, Wenzel C, Spassov S, Borgmann S, Lin Z, Wollborn J et al (2020) Flow-controlled ventilation attenuates lung injury in a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a preclinical randomized controlled study. Crit Care Med 48(3):e241–e248
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004209
pubmed: 31856000
pmcid: 7017946
Grassetto A, Pettenuzzo T, Badii F, Carlon R, Sella N, Navalesi P (2023) Flow-controlled ventilation may reduce mechanical power and increase ventilatory efficiency in severe coronavirus disease-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pulmonology 29(2):154–156
doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2022.05.006
pubmed: 35864057
Van Dessel E, De Meyer G, Morrison S, Jorens P, Schepens T (2022) Flow-controlled ventilation in moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19: an open-label repeated-measures controlled trial. Intensive Care Med Exp 10:19
doi: 10.1186/s40635-022-00449-4
pubmed: 35608696
pmcid: 9127816
The ARDS Definition Task Force (2012) Acute respiratory distress syndrome—the Berlin definition. JAMA 307(23):2526–2533
Trinkle CA, Broaddus RN, Sturgill JL, Waters CM, Morris PE (2022) Simple, accurate calculation of mechanical power in pressure controlled ventilation (PCV). Intensive Care Med Exp 10:22
doi: 10.1186/s40635-022-00448-5
pubmed: 35644896
pmcid: 9148680
Giosa L, Busana M, Pasticci I, Bonifazi M, Macri MM, Romitti F et al (2019) Mechanical power at a glance: a simple surrogate for volume-controlled ventilation. Intensive Care Med Exp 7:61
doi: 10.1186/s40635-019-0276-8
pubmed: 31773328
pmcid: 6879677
Heines SJH, de Jongh SAM, Strauch U, van der Horst ICC, van de Poll MCG, Bergmans DCJJ (2022) The global inhomogeneity index assessed by electrical impedance tomography overestimates PEEP requirement in patients with ARDS: an observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 22(1):258
doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01801-7
pubmed: 35971060
pmcid: 9377133
Zhao Z, Möller K, Steinmann D, Frerichs I, Guttmann J (2009) Evaluation of an electrical impedance tomography-based global inhomogeneity index for pulmonary ventilation distribution. Intensive Care Med 35(11):1900–1906
doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1589-y
pubmed: 19652949
Lowhagen K, Lundin S, Stenqvist O (2010) Regional intratidal gas distribution in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome assessed by electric impedance tomography. Minerva Anestesiol 76(12):1024–1035
pubmed: 21178912
Muders T, Hentze B, Simon P, Girrbach F, Doebler MRG, Leonhardt S et al (2019) A modified method to assess tidal recruitment by electrical impedance tomography. J Clin Med 8(8):1161
doi: 10.3390/jcm8081161
pubmed: 31382559
pmcid: 6723902
Sinha P, Calfee C, Beitler J, Soni N, Ho K, Matthay M et al (2019) Physiologic analysis and clinical performance of the ventilatory ratio in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 199(3):333–341
doi: 10.1164/rccm.201804-0692OC
pubmed: 30211618
pmcid: 6363976
Schmidt J, Wenzel C, Mahn M, Spassov S, Schmitz CH, Borgmann S et al (2018) Improved lung recruitment and oxygenation during mandatory ventilation with a new expiratory ventilation assistance device: a controlled interventional trial in healthy pigs. Eur J Anaesthesiol 35(10):736–744
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000819
pubmed: 29734208
pmcid: 6133202
Van Meenen DMP, Algera AG, Schuijt MTU, Simonis FD, Van der Hoeven SM, Neto AS et al (2023) Effect of mechanical power on mortality in invasively ventilated ICU patients without the acute respiratory distress syndrome—an analysis of three randomized clinical trials. Eur J Anaesthesiol 40(1):21–28
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001778
pubmed: 36398740
Spraider P, Abram J, Martini J, Putzer G, Glodny B et al (2023) Flow-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation in cardiac sugery with cardiopulmonary bypass—a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 91:111279
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111279
pubmed: 37797394
Weber J, Straka L, Borgmann S, Schmidt J, Wirth S, Schumann S (2020) Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) improves regional ventilation in obese patients—a randomized controlled crossover trial. BMC Anesthesiol 20(1):24
doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-0944-y
pubmed: 31992213
pmcid: 6986135
Becher T, Wendler A, Eimer C, Weiler N, Frerichs I (2019) Changes in electrical impedance tomography findings of ICU patients during rapid infusion of a fluid bolus: a prospective observational study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 199(12):1572–1575
doi: 10.1164/rccm.201812-2252LE
pubmed: 30875244
Haudeborg AF, Tuffet S, Perier F, Razazi K, De Prost N et al (2022) Driving pressure-guided ventilation decreases the mechanical power compared to predicted body weight-guided ventilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Crit Care 26:185
doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04054-5
Fan E, Del Sorbo L, Goligher EC, Hodgson CL, Munshi L, Walkey A et al (2017) An Official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of critical care medicine clinical practice guideline: mechanical ventilation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 195(9):1253–1263
doi: 10.1164/rccm.201703-0548ST
pubmed: 28459336