A randomized comparison of online mindfulness-based group sex therapy vs supportive group sex education to address sexual dysfunction in breast cancer survivors.

breast cancer mindfulness sex education sexual desire sexual dysfunction survivorship

Journal

The journal of sexual medicine
ISSN: 1743-6109
Titre abrégé: J Sex Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101230693

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 07 10 2023
revised: 19 01 2024
accepted: 24 01 2024
medline: 11 3 2024
pubmed: 11 3 2024
entrez: 11 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Sexual difficulties and vaginal pain are common following treatment for breast cancer. The goal of this study was to evaluate an online mindfulness-based group sex therapy vs an online supportive sex education group therapy to address these sexual difficulties. Breast cancer survivors (n = 118) were randomized to 1 of the 2 arms; 116 provided informed consent and completed the time 1 assessment. Treatment included 8 weekly 2-hour online group sessions. Those randomized to the mindfulness group completed daily mindfulness exercises, and those in the comparison arm read and completed exercises pertaining to sex education. Assessments were repeated at posttreatment and 6 months after the completion of the group. There was a main effect of treatment on primary endpoints of sexual desire, sexual distress, and vaginal pain, with all outcomes showing significant improvements, with no differential impact by treatment arm. Secondary endpoints of interoceptive awareness, mindfulness, and rumination about sex also significantly improved with both treatments, with no group-by-time interaction. Both mindfulness-based sex therapy and supportive sex education delivered in group format online are effective for improving many facets of sexual function, vaginal pain, rumination, mindfulness, and interoceptive awareness in breast cancer survivors. We used a randomized methodology. Future studies should seek to diversify participants. These findings highlight the need to offer similar treatments to more breast cancer survivors immediately after and in the years following cancer treatment as a means of improving survivorship quality of life.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Sexual difficulties and vaginal pain are common following treatment for breast cancer.
AIM OBJECTIVE
The goal of this study was to evaluate an online mindfulness-based group sex therapy vs an online supportive sex education group therapy to address these sexual difficulties.
METHODS METHODS
Breast cancer survivors (n = 118) were randomized to 1 of the 2 arms; 116 provided informed consent and completed the time 1 assessment. Treatment included 8 weekly 2-hour online group sessions. Those randomized to the mindfulness group completed daily mindfulness exercises, and those in the comparison arm read and completed exercises pertaining to sex education.
OUTCOMES RESULTS
Assessments were repeated at posttreatment and 6 months after the completion of the group.
RESULTS RESULTS
There was a main effect of treatment on primary endpoints of sexual desire, sexual distress, and vaginal pain, with all outcomes showing significant improvements, with no differential impact by treatment arm. Secondary endpoints of interoceptive awareness, mindfulness, and rumination about sex also significantly improved with both treatments, with no group-by-time interaction.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Both mindfulness-based sex therapy and supportive sex education delivered in group format online are effective for improving many facets of sexual function, vaginal pain, rumination, mindfulness, and interoceptive awareness in breast cancer survivors.
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS UNASSIGNED
We used a randomized methodology. Future studies should seek to diversify participants.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS CONCLUSIONS
These findings highlight the need to offer similar treatments to more breast cancer survivors immediately after and in the years following cancer treatment as a means of improving survivorship quality of life.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38465848
pii: 7625328
doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdae022
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Canadian Cancer Society Innovation
Organisme : Daniel Family Chair in Psychosocial Oncology

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society of Sexual Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Lori A Brotto (LA)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada.

Lauren Walker (L)

Division of Psychosocial Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2, Canada.

Carly Sears (C)

Division of Psychosocial Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.

Shannon Woo (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada.

Roanne Millman (R)

Private Practice, West Coast Centre for Sex Therapy , Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3H4, Canada.

Bozena Zdaniuk (B)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada.

Classifications MeSH