Quality assessment of malaria microscopic diagnosis at the Aristide Le Dantec University Hospital of Dakar, Senegal, in 2020.
Plasmodium
Diagnosis
Senegal
Sensitivity
Specificity
Journal
BMC research notes
ISSN: 1756-0500
Titre abrégé: BMC Res Notes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462768
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Mar 2024
09 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
29
08
2022
accepted:
12
10
2023
medline:
10
3
2024
pubmed:
10
3
2024
entrez:
9
3
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Following WHO guidelines, microscopy is the gold standard for malaria diagnosis in endemic countries. The Parasitology-Mycology laboratory (LPM) is the National Reference Laboratory and is currently undergoing ISO 15189 accreditation. In this context, we assessed the performance of the laboratory by confirming the reliability and the accuracy of results obtained in accordance with the requirements of the ISO 15189 standards. This study aimed to verify the method of microscopic diagnosis of malaria at the LPM, in the Aristide Le Dantec hospital (HALD) in Dakar, Senegal. This is a validation/verification study conducted from June to August 2020. Twenty (20) microscopic slides of thick/thin blood smear with known parasite densities (PD) selected from the Cheick Anta Diop University malaria slide bank in Dakar were used for this assessment. Six (6) were used to assess microscopists' ability to determine PD and fourteen (14) slides were used for detection (positive vs negative) and identification of parasites. Four (4) LPM-HALD microscopists read and recorded their results on prepared sheets. Data analysis was done with Microsoft Excel 2010 software. A minimum threshold of 50% concordance was used for comparison. Of the twenty (20) slides read, 100% concordance was obtained on eight (8) detection (positive vs negative) slides. Four (4) out of the six (6) parasite density evaluation slides obtained a concordance of less than 50%. Thirteen (13) out of the fourteen (14) identification slides obtained a concordance greater than 50%. Only one (1) identification slide obtained zero agreement from the microscopists. For species identification a concordance greater than 80% was noted and the microscopists obtained scores between 0.20 and 0.4 on a scale of 0 to 1 for parasite density reading. The microscopists obtained 100% precision, sensitivity, specificity and both negative and positive predictive values. This work demonstrated that the microscopic method of malaria diagnosis used in the LPM/HALD is in accordance with the requirements of WHO and ISO 15189. Further training of microscopists may be needed to maintain competency.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Following WHO guidelines, microscopy is the gold standard for malaria diagnosis in endemic countries. The Parasitology-Mycology laboratory (LPM) is the National Reference Laboratory and is currently undergoing ISO 15189 accreditation. In this context, we assessed the performance of the laboratory by confirming the reliability and the accuracy of results obtained in accordance with the requirements of the ISO 15189 standards. This study aimed to verify the method of microscopic diagnosis of malaria at the LPM, in the Aristide Le Dantec hospital (HALD) in Dakar, Senegal.
METHODS
METHODS
This is a validation/verification study conducted from June to August 2020. Twenty (20) microscopic slides of thick/thin blood smear with known parasite densities (PD) selected from the Cheick Anta Diop University malaria slide bank in Dakar were used for this assessment. Six (6) were used to assess microscopists' ability to determine PD and fourteen (14) slides were used for detection (positive vs negative) and identification of parasites. Four (4) LPM-HALD microscopists read and recorded their results on prepared sheets. Data analysis was done with Microsoft Excel 2010 software.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A minimum threshold of 50% concordance was used for comparison. Of the twenty (20) slides read, 100% concordance was obtained on eight (8) detection (positive vs negative) slides. Four (4) out of the six (6) parasite density evaluation slides obtained a concordance of less than 50%. Thirteen (13) out of the fourteen (14) identification slides obtained a concordance greater than 50%. Only one (1) identification slide obtained zero agreement from the microscopists. For species identification a concordance greater than 80% was noted and the microscopists obtained scores between 0.20 and 0.4 on a scale of 0 to 1 for parasite density reading. The microscopists obtained 100% precision, sensitivity, specificity and both negative and positive predictive values.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This work demonstrated that the microscopic method of malaria diagnosis used in the LPM/HALD is in accordance with the requirements of WHO and ISO 15189. Further training of microscopists may be needed to maintain competency.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38461329
doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06571-0
pii: 10.1186/s13104-023-06571-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
68Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
PNLP-Sn PNDLCLP. Bulletin de surveillance sentinelle du Paludisme 2018. 2018.
PNLP-Sn PNDLCLP. Plan strategique national de lutte contre le paludisme au Senegal 2016–2020. 2016. p. 116.
PNLP. Bulletin epidemiologique du paludisme au Senegal. 2019.pp.1–54.
WHO. World malaria report 2019. 2019.
OMS. Diagnostic microscopique du paludisme manuel d’assurance qualité. 2016.
MSAS. Diagnostic biologique du Paludisme Guide national. 2015. p. 1–55.
WHO. Malaria light microscopy: Creating a culture of quality. Report of the WHO WPRO-SEARO bi-regional workshop on quality assurance for malaria microscopy. 2005.
WHO. Planches pour le Diagnostic microscopique du paludisme. 2010.
WHO PIG de l’instructeur. Techniques de base pour le diagnostic microscopique du paludisme, 2e ed Part 2. 2014.
WHO PIG du S. Techniques de base pour le diagnostic microscopique du paludisme, 2e ed Part 1. 2014.
Direction de la lutte contre la Maladie P. Manuel de formation sur la pec et la prevention du paludisme. 2015.
WHO. Diagnostic microscopique du paludisme : manuel d’assurance qualité. Version 2. 2017.
SH-GTA 04—Revision 01. Guide technique d’accreditation de verification (portee A)/validation (portee B) des methodes en biologie medicale. 2015.
Diallo MA, Diongue K, Seck MC, Ndiaye M, Diallo I, Diedhiou Y, et al. Quality control of malaria microscopy reveals misdiagnosed non-falciparum species and other microscopically detectable pathogens in Senegal. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2018;17:1–8.
doi: 10.1186/s12941-018-0261-1
Blanchin M. Validation des méthodes d’analyse. Institt des Biomolécules, Univérsité Montpellier 1. 2010. p. 1–40
Anonymous. XLSTAT by Addinsoft: Analyse détaillée de sensibilité et spécificité. Available from https://www.xlstat.com/fr/solutions/fonctionnalites/analyse-detaillee-de-sensibilite-et-specificite . Accessed 31 Aug 2020
ISO 5725-1:1994(fr). ISO 5725-1:1994(fr) Exactitude (justesse et fidélité) des résultats et méthodes de mesure. 1994.
Anonymous. XLSTAT by Addinsoft: Analyse de système de mesure des variables qualitatives. 2020. https://www.xlstat.com/fr/solutions/fonctionnalites/analyse-de-systeme-de-mesure-des-variables-qualitatives . Accessed 31 Aug 2020
COFRAC. Guide technique d’accréditation de vérification (portée A)/validation (portée B) des méthodes en biologie médicale. SH GTA. 2015;04:1–191.