Implementation of large, multi-site hospital interventions: a realist evaluation of strategies for developing capability.
Capacity development
Change management
Implementation
Learning culture
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Mar 2024
06 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
17
04
2023
accepted:
14
02
2024
medline:
7
3
2024
pubmed:
7
3
2024
entrez:
6
3
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study presents guidelines for implementation distilled from the findings of a realist evaluation. The setting was local health districts in New South Wales, Australia that implemented three clinical improvement initiatives as part of a state-wide program. We focussed on implementation strategies designed to develop health professionals' capability to deliver value-based care initiatives for multisite programs. Capability, which increases implementers' ability to cope with unexpected scenarios is key to managing change. We used a mixed methods realist evaluation which tested and refined program theories elucidating the complex dynamic between context (C), mechanism (M) and outcome (O) to determine what works, for whom, under what circumstances. Data was drawn from program documents, a realist synthesis, informal discussions with implementation designers, and interviews with 10 key informants (out of 37 identified) from seven sites. Data analysis employed a retroductive approach to interrogate the causal factors identified as contributors to outcomes. CMO statements were refined for four initial program theories: Making it Relevant- where participation in activities was increased when targeted to the needs of the staff; Investment in Quality Improvement- where engagement in capability development was enhanced when it was valued by all levels of the organisation; Turnover and Capability Loss- where the effects of staff turnover were mitigated; and Community-Wide Priority- where there was a strategy of spanning sites. From these data five guiding principles for implementers were distilled: (1) Involve all levels of the health system to effectively implement large-scale capability development, (2) Design capability development activities in a way that supports a learning culture, (3) Plan capability development activities with staff turnover in mind, (4) Increased capability should be distributed across teams to avoid bottlenecks in workflows and the risk of losing key staff, (5) Foster cross-site collaboration to focus effort, reduce variation in practice and promote greater cohesion in patient care. A key implementation strategy for interventions to standardise high quality practice is development of clinical capability. We illustrate how leadership support, attention to staff turnover patterns, and making activities relevant to current issues, can lead to an emergent learning culture.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study presents guidelines for implementation distilled from the findings of a realist evaluation. The setting was local health districts in New South Wales, Australia that implemented three clinical improvement initiatives as part of a state-wide program. We focussed on implementation strategies designed to develop health professionals' capability to deliver value-based care initiatives for multisite programs. Capability, which increases implementers' ability to cope with unexpected scenarios is key to managing change.
METHODS
METHODS
We used a mixed methods realist evaluation which tested and refined program theories elucidating the complex dynamic between context (C), mechanism (M) and outcome (O) to determine what works, for whom, under what circumstances. Data was drawn from program documents, a realist synthesis, informal discussions with implementation designers, and interviews with 10 key informants (out of 37 identified) from seven sites. Data analysis employed a retroductive approach to interrogate the causal factors identified as contributors to outcomes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
CMO statements were refined for four initial program theories: Making it Relevant- where participation in activities was increased when targeted to the needs of the staff; Investment in Quality Improvement- where engagement in capability development was enhanced when it was valued by all levels of the organisation; Turnover and Capability Loss- where the effects of staff turnover were mitigated; and Community-Wide Priority- where there was a strategy of spanning sites. From these data five guiding principles for implementers were distilled: (1) Involve all levels of the health system to effectively implement large-scale capability development, (2) Design capability development activities in a way that supports a learning culture, (3) Plan capability development activities with staff turnover in mind, (4) Increased capability should be distributed across teams to avoid bottlenecks in workflows and the risk of losing key staff, (5) Foster cross-site collaboration to focus effort, reduce variation in practice and promote greater cohesion in patient care.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A key implementation strategy for interventions to standardise high quality practice is development of clinical capability. We illustrate how leadership support, attention to staff turnover patterns, and making activities relevant to current issues, can lead to an emergent learning culture.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38448960
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10721-w
pii: 10.1186/s12913-024-10721-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
303Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Futures Fund
ID : APP1178554
Organisme : Medical Research Futures Fund
ID : APP1178554
Organisme : Medical Research Futures Fund
ID : APP1178554
Organisme : Medical Research Futures Fund
ID : APP1178554
Organisme : Medical Research Futures Fund
ID : APP1178554
Organisme : Medical Research Futures Fund
ID : APP1178554
Organisme : Medical Research Futures Fund
ID : APP1178554
Organisme : Medical Research Futures Fund
ID : APP1178554
Organisme : Medical Research Futures Fund
ID : APP1178554
Organisme : Medical Research Futures Fund
ID : APP1178554
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Corallo AN, Croxford R, Goodman DC, et al. A systematic review of medical practice variation in OECD countries. Health Policy. 2014;114(1):5–14.
doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.08.002
pubmed: 24054709
Goodman DC. Unwarranted variation in pediatric medical care. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2009;56(4):745–55.
doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2009.05.007
pubmed: 19660625
pmcid: 3670609
Sutherland K, Levesque JF. Unwarranted clinical variation in health care: definitions and proposal of an analytic framework. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020;26(3):687–96.
doi: 10.1111/jep.13181
pubmed: 31136047
Bottle A, Mariscalco G, Shaw MA, et al. Unwarranted variation in the quality of care for patients with diseases of the thoracic aorta. J Am Heart Association. 2017;6(3):e004913.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004913
Mercuri M, Gafni A. Medical practice variations: what the literature tells us (or does not) about what are warranted and unwarranted variations. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(4):671–77.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01689.x
pubmed: 21501341
Best A, Greenhalgh T, Lewis S, et al. Large-system transformation in health care: a realist review. Milbank Q. 2012;90(3):421–56.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00670.x
pubmed: 22985277
pmcid: 3479379
Cox R, Kendall M, Molineux M et al. Refining a capability development framework for building successful consumer and staff partnerships in healthcare quality improvement: a coproduced eDelphi study. Health Expect 2022.
Gould D, Drey N, Berridge E-J. Nurses’ experiences of continuing professional development. Nurse Educ Today. 2007;27(6):602–09.
doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.08.021
pubmed: 17109999
O’Connell J, Gardner G, Coyer F. Beyond competencies: using a capability framework in developing practice standards for advanced practice nursing. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70(12):2728–35.
doi: 10.1111/jan.12475
pubmed: 25109608
Valderas Martinez J, Ricci-Cabello N, Prasopa-Plazier N, et al. Patient engagement: WHO technical series on safer primary care. World Health Organisation; 2016.
Hinman RS, Allen KD, Bennell KL, et al. Development of a core capability framework for qualified health professionals to optimise care for people with osteoarthritis: an OARSI initiative. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2020;28(2):154–66.
doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.12.001
Fraser SW, Greenhalgh T. Coping with complexity: educating for capability. BMJ. 2001;323(7316):799–803.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7316.799
pubmed: 11588088
pmcid: 1121342
Cairns L, Stephenson J. Capable workplace learning: Brill 2009.
Randmaa M, Mårtensson G, Leo Swenne C, et al. SBAR improves communication and safety climate and decreases incident reports due to communication errors in an anaesthetic clinic: a prospective intervention study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(1):e004268. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004268 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004268
pubmed: 24448849
pmcid: 3902348
Mittal S. How organizations implement new practices in dynamic context: role of deliberate learning and dynamic capabilities development in health care units. J Knowl Manage 2019.
Kokshagina O. Managing shifts to value-based healthcare and value digitalization as a multi-level dynamic capability development process. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2021;172:121072.
doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121072
Kislov R, Waterman H, Harvey G, et al. Rethinking capacity building for knowledge mobilisation: developing multilevel capabilities in healthcare organisations. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):166. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0166-0 .
doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0166-0
pubmed: 25398428
pmcid: 4234886
Westhorp G, Prins E, Kusters C et al. Realist evaluation: an overview. 2011. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/29235281.pdf
Greenhalgh T, Humphrey C, Hughes J, et al. How do you modernize a health service? A realist evaluation of whole-scale transformation in London. Milbank Q. 2009;87(2):391–416.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00562.x
pubmed: 19523123
pmcid: 2881448
Pawson R, Manzano-Santaella A. A realist diagnostic workshop. Evaluation. 2012;18(2):176–91.
doi: 10.1177/1356389012440912
Francis-Auton E, Sarkies M, Pomare C, et al. Real talk: a Realist Dialogic Approach in a Realist evaluation. Int J Qualitative Methods. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221120748/ .
doi: 10.1177/16094069221120748/
Sarkies MN, Francis-Auton E, Long JC, et al. Implementing large-system, value-based healthcare initiatives: a realist study protocol for seven natural experiments. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e044049. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044049 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044049
pubmed: 33371049
pmcid: 7757496
Sarkies MN, Long JC, Pomare C, et al. Avoiding unnecessary hospitalisation for patients with chronic conditions: a systematic review of implementation determinants for hospital avoidance programs. Implement Sci. 2020;15(91). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01049-0 .
Jagosh J. Retroductive theorizing in Pawson and Tilley’s applied scientific realism. J Crit Realism. 2020;19(2):121–30.
doi: 10.1080/14767430.2020.1723301
Long JC, Sarkies MN, Francis Auton E, et al. Conceptualising contexts, mechanisms and outcomes for implementing large-scale, multisite hospital improvement initiatives: a realist synthesis. BMJ Open. 2022;12(5):e058158. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058158 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058158
pubmed: 35589340
pmcid: 9126051
Francis-Auton E, Sarkies M, Pomare C, et al. Real talk: a Realist Dialogic Approach in a Realist evaluation. Int J Qualitative Methods. 2022;21:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221120748/ .
doi: 10.1177/16094069221120748/
Ellis LA, Sarkies M, Churruca K, et al. The Science of Learning Health Systems: scoping review of empirical research. JMIR Med Inf. 2022;10(2):e34907. https://doi.org/10.2196/34907 .
doi: 10.2196/34907
Long JC, Cunningham FC, Carswell P, et al. Who are the key players in a new translational research network? BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:338. https://doi.org/10.1186/10.1186/1472-6963-13-338 .
doi: 10.1186/10.1186/1472-6963-13-338
pubmed: 23987790
pmcid: 3844428
Long JC, Pomare C, Best S, et al. Building a knowledge exchange network in Australian clinical genomics: a social network study of the Australian Genomic Health Alliance. BMC Med. 2019;17(44). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1274-0 .
Long JC, Cunningham FC, Braithwaite J. Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):158. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/13/158 .
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-158
pubmed: 23631517
pmcid: 3648408
Francis-Auton E, Long JC, Sarkies M et al. Four System enablers of large System Transformation in Health Care: a mixed methods Realist evaluation. Milbank Q 2023;Accepted Nov 2023.
Hartviksen TA, Sjolie BM, Aspfors J, et al. Healthcare middle managersexperiences developing leadership capacity and capability in a public funded learning network. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):1–11.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3259-7
Hartviksen TA, Aspfors J, Uhrenfeldt L. Healthcare middle managers’ experiences of developing capacity and capability: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):1–19.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4345-1