The stress for surgeons: exploring stress entities with the robotic senhance surgical system.
Augmented intelligence
Robotic gynaecology
Robotic surgery
Robotic urology
Stress
Surg TLX
Journal
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Feb 2024
28 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
20
12
2023
accepted:
28
01
2024
medline:
28
2
2024
pubmed:
28
2
2024
entrez:
27
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Robotic surgery is on its way to revolutionizing traditional surgical procedures, offering precise and minimally invasive techniques hypothesized to shorten recovery times and improve patient outcomes. While there have been multiple publications on robotic systems' medical and procedural achievements, more emphasis should be put on the surgeon's experience, especially in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. The present report aims to systematically examine the stress impact on surgeons by comparing the robotic Senhance Surgical System (Asensus Surgical, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A) to laparoscopic surgery. The well-established "SURG-TLX" survey is used to measure distinct stress entities. The "SURG-TLX" survey is a modified version of the NASA-TLX, validated for surgery by M. Willson. Based on a comprehensive database from six centers encompassing various disciplines and surgical procedures, our analysis indicates significantly reduced "overall stress" levels for robotic (cockpit) compared to laparoscopic surgeons. Exploring the "SURG-TLX" stress dimensions further between methods (robotic vs. laparoscopic) and surgeon position (laparoscopic, (robotic) bedside, or (robotic) cockpit) resulted in significantly more Mental (p.value < 0.015), less Physical Demands (p.value < 0.001) and less Distraction (p.value < 0.009) for robotic surgery, especially regarding the robotic cockpit surgeons. This finding suggests that robotic surgery with the Senhance Surgical System contributes to a favorable stress profile for surgeons, potentially enhancing their overall well-being and performance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38413542
doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01853-6
pii: 10.1007/s11701-024-01853-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
94Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Muaddi H, Hafid ME, Choi WJ, Lillie E, de Mestral C, Nathens A et al (2021) Clinical outcomes of robotic surgery compared to conventional surgical approaches (laparoscopic or open): a systematic overview of reviews. Ann Surg 273(3):467–473
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003915
pubmed: 32398482
Wee IJY, Kuo L-J, Ngu JC-Y (2020) A systematic review of the true benefit of robotic surgery: Ergonomics. Int J Med Robot 16(4):e2113
doi: 10.1002/rcs.2113
pubmed: 32304167
Adams SR, Hacker MR, McKinney JL, Elkadry EA, Rosenblatt PL (2013) Musculoskeletal pain in gynecologic surgeons. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(5):656–660
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.04.013
pubmed: 23796512
Wohlauer M, Coleman DM, Sheahan MG, Meltzer AJ, Halloran B, Hallbeck S et al (2021) Physical pain and musculoskeletal discomfort in vascular surgeons. J Vasc Surg 73(4):1414–1421
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.07.097
pubmed: 32890720
Shugaba A, Subar DA, Slade K, Willett M, Abdel-Aty M, Campbell I et al (2023) Surgical stress: the muscle and cognitive demands of robotic and laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg Open 4(2):e284
doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000284
pubmed: 37342254
pmcid: 7614670
Moore LJ, Wilson MR, Waine E, McGrath JS, Masters RSW, Vine SJ (2015) Robotically assisted laparoscopy benefits surgical performance under stress. J Robot Surg 9(4):277–284
doi: 10.1007/s11701-015-0527-y
pubmed: 26530839
Klein MI, Mouraviev V, Craig C, Salamone L, Plerhoples TA, Wren SM et al (2014) Mental stress experienced by first-year residents and expert surgeons with robotic and laparoscopic surgery interfaces. J Robot Surg 8(2):149–155
doi: 10.1007/s11701-013-0446-8
pubmed: 27637524
Klein MI, Warm JS, Riley MA, Matthews G, Doarn C, Donovan JF et al (2012) Mental workload and stress perceived by novice operators in the laparoscopic and robotic minimally invasive surgical interfaces. J Endourol 26(8):1089–1094
doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0641
pubmed: 22429084
Hurley AM, Kennedy PJ, O’Connor L, Dinan TG, Cryan JF, Boylan G et al (2015) SOS save our surgeons: stress levels reduced by robotic surgery. Gynecol Surg 12(3):197–206
doi: 10.1007/s10397-015-0891-7
Moore LJ, Wilson MR, McGrath JS, Waine E, Masters RSW, Vine SJ (2015) Surgeons’ display reduced mental effort and workload while performing robotically assisted surgical tasks, when compared to conventional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 29(9):2553–2560
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3967-y
pubmed: 25427414
Stefanidis D, Wang F, Korndorffer JR, Dunne JB, Scott DJ (2010) Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Surg Endosc 24(2):377–382
doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0578-0
pubmed: 19536599
Singh H, Modi HN, Ranjan S, Dilley JWR, Airantzis D, Yang G-Z et al (2018) Robotic surgery improves technical performance and enhances prefrontal activation during high temporal demand. Ann Biomed Eng 46(10):1621–1636
doi: 10.1007/s10439-018-2049-z
pubmed: 29869104
pmcid: 6153983
Zamudio J, Woodward J, Kanji FF, Anger JT, Catchpole K, Cohen TN. (2023) Demands of surgical teams in robotic-assisted surgery: an assessment of intraoperative workload within different surgical specialties. The Am J of Surg. Available from: URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961023002635 .
Mazzella A, Casiraghi M, Galetta D, Cara A, Maisonneuve P, Petrella F et al (2023) How much stress does a surgeon endure? the effects of the robotic approach on the autonomic nervous system of a surgeon in the modern era of thoracic surgery. Cancers (Basel) 15:4
doi: 10.3390/cancers15041207
Spagnolo E, CristóbalQuevedo I, de Las G, Casas S, López Carrasco A, CarbonellLópez M, PascualMigueláñez I et al (2022) Surgeons’ workload assessment during indocyanine-assisted deep endometriosis surgery using the surgery task load index: the impact of the learning curve. Front Surg. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.982922
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.982922
pubmed: 36636585
pmcid: 9831055
McKechnie T, Khamar J, Daniel R, Lee Y, Park L, Doumouras AG et al (2023) The senhance surgical system in colorectal surgery: a systematic review. J Robot Surg 17(2):325–334
doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01455-0
pubmed: 36127508
Samalavicius NE, Janusonis V, Siaulys R, Jasėnas M, Deduchovas O, Venckus R et al (2020) Robotic surgery using Senhance® robotic platform: single center experience with first 100 cases. J Robot Surg 14(2):371–376
doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01000-6
pubmed: 31301021
Hart SG, Staveland LE. (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N, editors. Advances in Psychology : Human Mental Workload. North-Holland. p. 139–83 Available from: URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166411508623869 .
Wilson MR, Poolton JM, Malhotra N, Ngo K, Bright E, Masters RSW (2011) Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the surgery task load index (SURG-TLX). World J Surg 35(9):1961–1969
doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1141-4
pubmed: 21597890
pmcid: 3152702
Thomas A, Murtaza AN, Michael Spiers HV, Zargaran A, Turki M, Mathur J et al (2019) Declining interest in general surgical training - challenging misconceptions and improving access at undergraduate level. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 40:3–8
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2018.11.002
pubmed: 30962923
Bassyouni Z, Elhajj IH (2021) Augmented reality meets artificial intelligence in robotics: a systematic review. Front Robot AI 8:724798
doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.724798
pubmed: 34631805
pmcid: 8493292
van der Schatte Olivier RH, Van’tHullenaar CDP, Ruurda JP, Broeders IAMJ (2009) Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23(6):1365–1371
doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0184-6
pubmed: 18855053
Wong SW, Crowe P (2022) Factors affecting the learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery. J Robot Surg 16(6):1249–1256
doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01373-1
pubmed: 35106738
pmcid: 9606100
Azadi S, Green IC, Arnold A, Truong M, Potts J, Martino MA. (2021) Robotic Surgery: The Impact of Simulation and Other Innovative Platforms on Performance and Training. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology; 28(3):490–5. Available from: URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553465020311687