A comparative analysis of IOP measurement accuracy with reused iCare probes.

Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) glaucoma iCare tonometry intraocular pressure (IOP) rebound tonometry reused tonometer probes tonometer probe disinfection

Journal

Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
ISSN: 2589-4196
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmol Glaucoma
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101730510

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 12 12 2023
revised: 10 02 2024
accepted: 14 02 2024
medline: 25 2 2024
pubmed: 25 2 2024
entrez: 24 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To assess the accuracy of reused iCare probes after disinfection with 70% isopropyl alcohol and ethylene glycol compared to new iCare probes and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT). Prospective comparative analysis PARTICIPANTS: 118 eyes from 59 patients recruited from the Aravind Eye Hospital glaucoma clinic in Tirupati, South India. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured on each eye using a new iCare tonometer probe, an iCare probe previously used and disinfected one time prior (once used probe) and five times prior (multiply used probe), as well as with GAT. Probes were disinfected after each use with 70% isopropyl alcohol swabs and ethylene oxide sterilization. Agreement demonstrated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), mean difference in IOP values with limits of agreement, and Bland-Altman plots among IOP measurement approaches. Compared to new iCare probes, both once used probes (ICC=0.989, 95%CI 0.985-0.993) and multiply used probes (ICC=0.989, 95%CI 0.984-0.992) showed excellent agreement, and the mean difference in IOP was minimal for both once used probes (0.70 mmHg, 95%CI 0.29-1.11) and multiply used probes (0.75 mmHg, 95%CI 0.66-0.82) compared to new probes. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated minimal differences between new and reused probes across the spectrum of IOP. When comparing multiply used probes to once used probes, there was a high level of agreement (0.993 (95%CI 0.990-0.995) and negligible mean IOP difference 0.04 mmHg (95% CI -0.32-0.40). Additionally, ICC values for new probes (0.966, 95%CI 0.951-0.976), once used probes (0.958, 95%CI 0.940-0.971), and multiply used probes (0.957, 95%CI 0.938-0.970) compared to GAT were similar and all showed excellent agreement. Both new and reused iCare probes underestimated IOP by 2-3 mmHg compared to GAT. In this prospective comparative analysis, we found that reusing iCare probes up to five times does not compromise the accuracy of IOP measurements when disinfected with 70% isopropyl alcohol swabs and ethylene oxide. Reusing iCare probes has the potential to transform care by reducing cost, decreasing environmental waste, and allowing for glaucoma screening camps and increased glaucoma monitoring in low resource settings leading to earlier identification and treatment of glaucoma.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38401758
pii: S2589-4196(24)00032-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2024.02.005
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Vedesh M Kulkarni (VM)

Department of Glaucoma, Sri Venkateswara Aravind Eye Hospital, Tirupati, India.

Elizabeth C Ciociola (EC)

Department of Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Ashok S Vardhan (AS)

Department of Glaucoma, Sri Venkateswara Aravind Eye Hospital, Tirupati, India. Electronic address: ashokvar@aravind.org.

Balagiri Sundar (B)

Department of Glaucoma, Sri Venkateswara Aravind Eye Hospital, Tirupati, India.

Sharmila Rajendrababu (S)

Department of Glaucoma, Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, India.

Pradeep Y Ramulu (PY)

Department of Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Classifications MeSH