The long and short of it: benchmarking viromics using Illumina, Nanopore and PacBio sequencing technologies.

Illumina Nanopore PacBio Phage Viromics bacteriophage bioinformatics hybrid assembly long-reads viral metagenomics

Journal

Microbial genomics
ISSN: 2057-5858
Titre abrégé: Microb Genom
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101671820

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2024
Historique:
medline: 20 2 2024
pubmed: 20 2 2024
entrez: 20 2 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Viral metagenomics has fuelled a rapid change in our understanding of global viral diversity and ecology. Long-read sequencing and hybrid assembly approaches that combine long- and short-read technologies are now being widely implemented in bacterial genomics and metagenomics. However, the use of long-read sequencing to investigate viral communities is still in its infancy. While Nanopore and PacBio technologies have been applied to viral metagenomics, it is not known to what extent different technologies will impact the reconstruction of the viral community. Thus, we constructed a mock bacteriophage community of previously sequenced phage genomes and sequenced them using Illumina, Nanopore and PacBio sequencing technologies and tested a number of different assembly approaches. When using a single sequencing technology, Illumina assemblies were the best at recovering phage genomes. Nanopore- and PacBio-only assemblies performed poorly in comparison to Illumina in both genome recovery and error rates, which both varied with the assembler used. The best Nanopore assembly had errors that manifested as SNPs and INDELs at frequencies 41 and 157 % higher than found in Illumina only assemblies, respectively. While the best PacBio assemblies had SNPs at frequencies 12 and 78 % higher than found in Illumina-only assemblies, respectively. Despite high-read coverage, long-read-only assemblies recovered a maximum of one complete genome from any assembly, unless reads were down-sampled prior to assembly. Overall the best approach was assembly by a combination of Illumina and Nanopore reads, which reduced error rates to levels comparable with short-read-only assemblies. When using a single technology, Illumina only was the best approach. The differences in genome recovery and error rates between technology and assembler had downstream impacts on gene prediction, viral prediction, and subsequent estimates of diversity within a sample. These findings will provide a starting point for others in the choice of reads and assembly algorithms for the analysis of viromes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38376377
doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001198
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Ryan Cook (R)

School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, College Road, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.

Nathan Brown (N)

Centre for Phage Research, Dept Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE1 7RH, UK.

Branko Rihtman (B)

School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Slawomir Michniewski (S)

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Tamsin Redgwell (T)

COPSAC, Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Ledreborg Alle 34, 2820, Gentofte, Denmark.

Martha Clokie (M)

Centre for Phage Research, Dept Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE1 7RH, UK.

Dov J Stekel (DJ)

School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, College Road, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.
Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Johannesburg, Rossmore 2029, South Africa.

Yin Chen (Y)

School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

David J Scanlan (DJ)

School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Jon L Hobman (JL)

School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, College Road, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.

Andrew Nelson (A)

Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Northumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.

Michael A Jones (MA)

School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, College Road, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK.

Darren Smith (D)

Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Northumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.

Andrew Millard (A)

Centre for Phage Research, Dept Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE1 7RH, UK.

Classifications MeSH