Reduced bone density based on Hounsfield units following long-segment spinal fusion with Harrington rods.

Bone density Harrington rod Hounsfield units spinal fusion stress shielding

Journal

World neurosurgery
ISSN: 1878-8769
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528275

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 19 12 2023
revised: 10 02 2024
accepted: 12 02 2024
medline: 20 2 2024
pubmed: 20 2 2024
entrez: 19 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Long-segment instrumentation, such as Harrington rods, offload vertebrae within the construct, which may result in significant stress shielding of the fused segments. The present study aimed to determine the effects of spinal fusion on bone density by measuring Hounsfield units (HU) throughout the spine in patients with a history of Harrington rod fusion. Patients with a history of Harrington rod fusion treated at a single academic institution were identified. Mean HU were calculated at five spinal segments for each patient-cranial adjacent mobile segment, cranial fused segment, mid-construct fused segment, caudal fused segment, and caudal adjacent mobile segment. Mean HU for each level were compared using paired-samples t-test with statistical significance defined by p<0.05. Hierarchical multiple regression, including age, gender, body mass index, and time since original fusion, was used to determine predictors of mid-fused segment HUs. One hundred patients were included (mean age 55 ±12 years, 62% female). Mean HU for the mid-construct fused segment (110, 95%CI [100-121]) were significantly lower than both the cranial and caudal fused segments (150 and 118, respectively; both p<0.05), as well as both the cranial and caudal adjacent mobile segments (210 and 130, respectively; both p<0.001). Multivariable regression showed mid-construct HU were predicted only by patient age (-2.6HU/year; 95%CI [-3.4, -1.9]; p<0.001) and time since original surgery (-1.4HU/year; 95%CI [-2.6, -0.2]; p=0.02). HU were significantly decreased in the middle of prior long-segment fusion constructs, suggesting multilevel fusion constructs lead to vertebral bone density loss within the construct, potentially from stress shielding.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Long-segment instrumentation, such as Harrington rods, offload vertebrae within the construct, which may result in significant stress shielding of the fused segments. The present study aimed to determine the effects of spinal fusion on bone density by measuring Hounsfield units (HU) throughout the spine in patients with a history of Harrington rod fusion.
METHODS METHODS
Patients with a history of Harrington rod fusion treated at a single academic institution were identified. Mean HU were calculated at five spinal segments for each patient-cranial adjacent mobile segment, cranial fused segment, mid-construct fused segment, caudal fused segment, and caudal adjacent mobile segment. Mean HU for each level were compared using paired-samples t-test with statistical significance defined by p<0.05. Hierarchical multiple regression, including age, gender, body mass index, and time since original fusion, was used to determine predictors of mid-fused segment HUs.
RESULTS RESULTS
One hundred patients were included (mean age 55 ±12 years, 62% female). Mean HU for the mid-construct fused segment (110, 95%CI [100-121]) were significantly lower than both the cranial and caudal fused segments (150 and 118, respectively; both p<0.05), as well as both the cranial and caudal adjacent mobile segments (210 and 130, respectively; both p<0.001). Multivariable regression showed mid-construct HU were predicted only by patient age (-2.6HU/year; 95%CI [-3.4, -1.9]; p<0.001) and time since original surgery (-1.4HU/year; 95%CI [-2.6, -0.2]; p=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
HU were significantly decreased in the middle of prior long-segment fusion constructs, suggesting multilevel fusion constructs lead to vertebral bone density loss within the construct, potentially from stress shielding.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38373686
pii: S1878-8750(24)00260-2
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.063
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Alexander Swart (A)

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Abdelrahman M Hamouda (AM)

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Zach Pennington (Z)

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Anthony L Mikula (AL)

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Michael Martini (M)

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Nikita Lakomkin (N)

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Mahnoor Shafi (M)

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Ahmad N Nassr (AN)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Arjun S Sebastian (AS)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Jeremy L Fogelson (JL)

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Brett A Freedman (BA)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Benjamin D Elder (BD)

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Electronic address: elder.benjamin@mayo.edu.

Classifications MeSH