Release from response interference in color-word contingency learning.

Contingency learning Learning PEP 2.0 model Response interference

Journal

Acta psychologica
ISSN: 1873-6297
Titre abrégé: Acta Psychol (Amst)
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0370366

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 20 10 2022
revised: 05 02 2024
accepted: 12 02 2024
pubmed: 18 2 2024
medline: 18 2 2024
entrez: 17 2 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In identifying the print colors of words when some combinations of color and word occur more frequently than others, people quickly show evidence of learning these associations. This contingency learning effect is evident in faster and more accurate responses to high-contingency combinations than to low-contingency combinations. Across four experiments, we systematically varied the number of response-irrelevant word stimuli connected to response-relevant colors. In each experiment, one group experienced the typical contingency learning paradigm with three colors linked to three words; other groups saw more words (six or twelve) linked to the same three colors. All four experiments disconfirmed a central prediction derived from the Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP 2.0) model (Schmidt et al., 2016)-that the magnitude of the contingency learning effect should remain stable as more words are added to the response-irrelevant dimension, as long as the color-word contingency ratios are maintained. Responses to high-contingency items did slow down numerically as the number of words increased between groups, consistent with the prediction from PEP 2.0, but these changes were unreliable. Inconsistent with PEP 2.0, however, overall response time did not slow down and responses to low-contingency items actually sped up as the number of words increased across groups. These findings suggest that the PEP 2.0 model should be modified to incorporate response interference caused by high-probability associations when responding to low-probability combinations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38367395
pii: S0001-6918(24)00064-7
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104187
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104187

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Brady R T Roberts (BRT)

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada. Electronic address: bradyrtroberts@gmail.com.

Noah D Forrin (ND)

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.

David McLean (D)

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.

Colin M MacLeod (CM)

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.

Classifications MeSH