Genetic literacy among primary care physicians in a resource-constrained setting.
Continuing education
Genetics
Health literacy
Healthcare practice
Knowledge
Primary care
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Feb 2024
13 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
01
08
2023
accepted:
29
01
2024
medline:
14
2
2024
pubmed:
14
2
2024
entrez:
13
2
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Genetic literacy among primary healthcare providers is crucial for appropriate patient care with the advances in genetic and genomic medicine. Studies from high-income countries highlight the lack of knowledge in genetics and the need to develop curricula for continuing professional development of non-geneticists. Scarce data is available from resource-constrained countries in Middle East and North Africa. Lebanon is a small country in this region characterized by high rates of consanguinity and genetic disorders like several surrounding countries, such as Jordan, Syria, and Turkey. The primary aim of this study assessed the genetic literacy, self-perceived and actual knowledge as well as practices among primary care providers in Lebanon. The secondary aim identified their educational needs and proposed evidence-based continuing education programs. A cross-sectional survey-based study, using a self-administered questionnaire, was conducted targeting physicians from Family Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Pediatrics. The questionnaire was divided into five sections: demographics, familiarity with genetic tests, self-reported and actual knowledge, genetic practices, and educational needs. Statistics were performed using SPSS v24. The Chi-square test was used for independent variables. Differences between mean scores were measured using paired sample t-tests for groups of two levels and one-way ANOVA for more than two. Multiple linear regression was used to study the variables associated with the knowledge score while controlling for other variables. The survey included 123 physicians. They were mostly familiar with karyotype as first-tier genetic test. Although 38% perceived their knowledge as good, only 6% scored as such in knowledge assessment. A better knowledge score was observed in academic institutions as well as in urban settings (p<0.05). One third never ordered any genetic testing, mostly due to poor knowledge. Almost all (98%) were ready to attend continuing professional development sessions in genetics. Our findings show the need to improve genetic literacy among healthcare frontliners, focusing on remote regions and nonacademic centers in Lebanon, a model for other resource-constrained country in the Middle East and North Africa region. This study advances recommendations for evidence-based genetic continuing education programs and highlighted the role of that the few genetic specialists can play in their successful implementation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Genetic literacy among primary healthcare providers is crucial for appropriate patient care with the advances in genetic and genomic medicine. Studies from high-income countries highlight the lack of knowledge in genetics and the need to develop curricula for continuing professional development of non-geneticists. Scarce data is available from resource-constrained countries in Middle East and North Africa. Lebanon is a small country in this region characterized by high rates of consanguinity and genetic disorders like several surrounding countries, such as Jordan, Syria, and Turkey.
METHODS
METHODS
The primary aim of this study assessed the genetic literacy, self-perceived and actual knowledge as well as practices among primary care providers in Lebanon. The secondary aim identified their educational needs and proposed evidence-based continuing education programs. A cross-sectional survey-based study, using a self-administered questionnaire, was conducted targeting physicians from Family Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Pediatrics. The questionnaire was divided into five sections: demographics, familiarity with genetic tests, self-reported and actual knowledge, genetic practices, and educational needs. Statistics were performed using SPSS v24. The Chi-square test was used for independent variables. Differences between mean scores were measured using paired sample t-tests for groups of two levels and one-way ANOVA for more than two. Multiple linear regression was used to study the variables associated with the knowledge score while controlling for other variables.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The survey included 123 physicians. They were mostly familiar with karyotype as first-tier genetic test. Although 38% perceived their knowledge as good, only 6% scored as such in knowledge assessment. A better knowledge score was observed in academic institutions as well as in urban settings (p<0.05). One third never ordered any genetic testing, mostly due to poor knowledge. Almost all (98%) were ready to attend continuing professional development sessions in genetics.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings show the need to improve genetic literacy among healthcare frontliners, focusing on remote regions and nonacademic centers in Lebanon, a model for other resource-constrained country in the Middle East and North Africa region. This study advances recommendations for evidence-based genetic continuing education programs and highlighted the role of that the few genetic specialists can play in their successful implementation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38350948
doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05110-0
pii: 10.1186/s12909-024-05110-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
140Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Sharoff L. Genetics and genomics integration into undergraduate nursing education. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2015;5(4):13–8.
Mikat-Stevens NA, Larson IA, Tarini BA. Primary-care providers’ perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: a systematic review of the literature. Genet Med. 2015;17(3):169–76.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.101
pubmed: 25210938
Wetterstrand KA. 2022. Data from the NHGRI Genome Sequencing Program (GSP) Available at: www.genome.gov/sequencingcostsdata. Accessed 22 June 2023.
Tognetto A, Michelazzo MB, Ricciardi W, Federici A, Boccia S. Core competencies in genetics for healthcare professionals: results from a literature review and a Delphi method. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):1–0.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1456-7
Swandayani YM, Cayami FK, Winarni TI, Utari A. Familiarity and genetic literacy among medical students in Indonesia. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21:1–0.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02946-8
Zimani AN, Peterlin B, Kovanda A. Increasing genomic literacy through national genomic projects. Front Genet. 2021;12:693253.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.693253
pubmed: 34456970
pmcid: 8387713
Carroll JC, Morrison S, Miller FA, Wilson BJ, Permaul JA, Allanson J. Anticipating the primary care role in genomic medicine: expectations of genetics health professionals. J Community Genet. 2021;12(4):559–68.
doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00544-1
pubmed: 34379295
pmcid: 8554873
Kolb SE, Aguilar MC, Dinenberg M, Kaye CI. Genetics education for primary care providers in community health settings. J Community Health. 1999;24(1):45–59.
doi: 10.1023/A:1018765215470
pubmed: 10036647
Jenkins BD, Fischer CG, Polito CA, Maiese DR, Keehn AS, Lyon M, Edick MJ, Taylor MR, Andersson HC, Bodurtha JN, Blitzer MG. The 2019 US medical genetics workforce: a focus on clinical genetics. Genet Sci. 2021;23(8):1458–64.
Riegert-Johnson DL, Korf BR, Alford RL, Broder MI, Keats BJ, Ormond KE, Pyeritz RE, Watson MS. Outline of a medical genetics curriculum for internal medicine residency training programs. Genet Sci. 2004;6(6):543–7.
American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. 2022. Genetics101 Series for Healthcare Providers. Available from: https://www.acmgeducation.net/Listing/11e715f8-2d 55-4656-bd98-aa7a9a2fa83. Accessed 22 June 2023.
Ong CSB, Fok RW, Tan RCA, Fung SM, Sun S, Ngeow JYY. (2022). General practitioners’ (GPs) experience, attitudes and needs on clinical genetic services: a systematic review. Fam Med Community Health., 10(4):e001515. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2021-001515 . PMID: 36450397.
Tadmouri GO, Nair P, Obeid T, et al. Consanguinity and reproductive health among arabs. Reprod Health. 2009;6:17.
doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-6-17
pubmed: 19811666
pmcid: 2765422
Nakouzi G, Kreidieh K, Yazbek S. A review of the diverse genetic disorders in the Lebanese population: highlighting the urgency for community genetic services. J Community Genet. 2015;6(1):83–105.
doi: 10.1007/s12687-014-0203-3
pubmed: 25261319
Alotaibi AA, Cordero MAW. (2021) Assessing Medical Students’ Knowledge of Genetics: Basis for Improving Genetics Curriculum for Future Clinical Practice. Adv Med Educ Pract., 12:1521–1530. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S337756 . PMID: 35002351.
Alfaqih MA, Khader YS, Bashir N et al. (2019) Attitude of Jordanian Physicians toward Biochemistry and Genetics. Biomed Res Int., 13;2019:3176951. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3176951 . PMID: 31815130.
Hamad L, Kreidieh K, Hamdan MB, Nakouzi G, Yazbek S. (2020). Mapping the Diverse Genetic Disorders and Rare Diseases Among the Syrian Population: Implications on Refugee Health and Health Services in Host Countries. J Immigr Minor Health., 22(6):1347–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-020-00987-7 . PMID: 32172498.
Tomatir AG, Sorkun HC, Demirhan H, Akdağ B. Genetics and genetic counseling: practices and opinions of primary care physicians in Turkey. Genet Med. 2007;9(2):130–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/gim.0b013e3180306880 . PMID: 17304055.
doi: 10.1097/gim.0b013e3180306880
pubmed: 17304055
Paneque M, Cornel MC, Curtisova V, Houwink E, Jackson L, Kent A, Lunt P, Macek M, Stefansdottir V, Turchetti D, Skirton H. (2017). Implementing genetic education in primary care: the Gen-Equip programme. J Community Genet.,8(2):147–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-017-0296-6 . PMID: 28289980.
Clyman JC, Nazir F, Tarolli S, Black E, Lombardi RQ, Higgins JJ. The impact of a genetics education program on physicians’ knowledge and genetic counseling referral patterns. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):e143–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701477373 .
doi: 10.1080/01421590701477373
pubmed: 17978961
Flouris A, Hawthorne G, Aitken M, Gaff C, Metcalfe SA. (2010) Development of a questionnaire for evaluating genetics education in general practice. J Community Genet., 1(4):175– 83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-010-0027-8 . PMID: 22460300.
Scheuner MT, Sales P, Hoggatt K, Zhang N, Whooley MA, Kelley MJ. (2023). Genetics professionals are key to the integration of genetic testing within the practice of frontline clinicians. Genet Med., 25(1):103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2022.09.012 . PMID: 36301261.
Asch S, Connor SE, Hamilton EG, Fox SA. (2000). Problems in recruiting community-based physicians for health services research. J Gen Intern Med., 15(8):591-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.02329.x . PMID: 10940152.
Haga SB, Burke W, Agans R. (2013). Primary-care physicians’ access to genetic specialists: an impediment to the routine use of genomic medicine? Genet Med., 15(7):513-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2012.168 . PMID: 23306802.
Seibel E, Gunn G, Ali N, Jordan E, Kenneson A. Primary care providers’ use of Genetic Services in the Southeast United States: barriers, facilitators, and strategies. J Prim Care Community Health. 2022;13:21501319221134752. 0.1177/21501319221134752.
doi: 10.1177/21501319221134752
pubmed: 36345220
pmcid: 9647281
Harding B, Webber C, Ruhland L, Dalgarno N, Armour CM, Birtwhistle R, Brown G, Carroll JC, Flavin M, Phillips S, MacKenzie JJ. Primary care providers’ lived experiences of genetics in practice. J Community Genet. 2019;10(1):85–93.
doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0364-6
pubmed: 29700759
Lopes-Junior LC, Carvalho Junior PM, de Faria Ferraz VE, Nascimento LC, Van Riper M, Flória-Santos M. Genetic education, knowledge and experiences between nurses and physicians in primary care in Brazil: a cross-sectional study. Nurs Health Sci. 2017;19(1):66–74.
doi: 10.1111/nhs.12304
pubmed: 27510609
Falah N, Umer A, Warnick E, Vallejo M, Lefeber T. Genetics education in primary care residency training: satisfaction and current barriers. BMC Prim Care. 2022;23(1):156.
doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01765-0
pubmed: 35718772
pmcid: 9208192
Fogleman AJ, Zahnd WE, Lipka AE, Malhi RS, Ganai S, Delfino KR, Jenkins WD. Knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers towards genetic testing across three rural Illinois communities. J Community Genet. 2019;10(3):417–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-019-00407-w .
doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00407-w
pubmed: 30673953
pmcid: 6591342
Barbour B, Salameh P. Consanguinity in Lebanon: prevalence, distribution and determinants. J Biosoc Sci. 2009;41(4):505.
doi: 10.1017/S0021932009003290
pubmed: 19175949
Talwar D, Tseng TS, Foster M, Xu L, Chen LS. Genetics/genomics education for nongenetic health professionals: a systematic literature review. Genet Med. 2017;19(7):725–32.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.156
pubmed: 27763635
Coleman T, Bensend T, Mills R, Orlando LA, Doyle L. (2023). Critical components of genomic medicine practice for non-genetics healthcare professionals: Genetic counselors’ perspectives and implications for medical education. J Genet Couns., https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1689 . PMID: 36808791.