Defining Preferred Esthetics of the Ideal Phallus via Crowdsource Survey.


Journal

Urology
ISSN: 1527-9995
Titre abrégé: Urology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0366151

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 02 11 2023
revised: 03 01 2024
accepted: 06 02 2024
pubmed: 14 2 2024
medline: 14 2 2024
entrez: 13 2 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To describe phalloplasty subunits and determine the preferred crowdsourced esthetics. Esthetic ideals are often used to guide reconstruction, and there has been an increase in the number of gender-affirming surgeries and reconstructive phalloplasties performed. However, there is a paucity of literature describing ideal phalloplasty esthetics. Phallus esthetic subunits were defined, and a split testing-based survey was used. Subjects were solicited via Craigslist, Amazon Mechanical Turk, and Reddit and distributed among health care co-workers. Computer-generated images with variable ratios of glans, corona, and shaft were provided and respondents were asked to select the most esthetically pleasing photo. Demographic information was gathered. Univariate and multivariate regression were performed. A total of 1029 people responded to the survey request and 909 people (88.3%) completed the entire survey. There were 440 respondents who self-identified as male, 334 female, 92 transgender male, and 25 transgender female. The health care field was the profession for 55.4%. Health care providers had 65.3% higher odds of preferring the longer shaft length-to-width ratio, 30.3% less odds of preferring a bilateral taper of the glans, and 48.4% less odds of preferring an angulated shaft compared to non-health care providers (P = .006, P = .021, P <.001, respectively). When compared to males, transgender females were more than 13 times likely to prefer an angulated glans corona junction (P = .008). The ideal phallic esthetic varies by individual, and there were statistically significant preferences across age, education, health care status, gender, and sexual orientation. This study can serve as a guide on phalloplasties for patients and gender-affirming surgeons.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38350549
pii: S0090-4295(24)00067-0
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.02.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

63-68

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests.

Auteurs

Justin J Cordero (JJ)

University of California Riverside, School of Medicine, Riverside, CA.

Sarah Eidelson (S)

University of Southern California, Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Los Angeles, CA.

Leonardo Alaniz (L)

University of California Irvine, School of Medicine, Irvine, CA.

Elizabeth Lucich (E)

Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

Julia A Cook (JA)

Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

Sunil S Tholpady (SS)

Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, R.L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN.

Michael W Chu (MW)

University of Southern California, Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address: dr.michael.chu@gmail.com.

Classifications MeSH