Telemedical stroke care significantly improves patient outcome in rural areas - long-term analysis of the German NEVAS network.

Acute stroke therapy Ischaemic stroke Neurology Stroke units Telemedicine Thrombolysis

Journal

International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society
ISSN: 1747-4949
Titre abrégé: Int J Stroke
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101274068

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Feb 2024
Historique:
medline: 13 2 2024
pubmed: 13 2 2024
entrez: 12 2 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Comprehensive stroke centers (CSC) offer state-of-the-art stroke care in metropolitan centers. However, in rural areas sufficient stroke expertise is much scarcer. Recently, telemedical stroke networks have offered instant consultation by stroke experts, enabling immediate administration of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) on-site and decision on thrombectomy. While these immediate decisions are made during the consult, the impact of the network structures on stroke care in spoke hospitals is still not well described. This study was performed to determine if on-site performance in rural hospitals and patient outcome improve over time through participation and regular medical staff training within a telemedical stroke network. In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from stroke patients treated in four regional hospitals within the telemedical Neurovascular Network of Southwest Bavaria (NEVAS) between 2014-2019. We only included those patients that were treated in the regional hospitals until discharge at home or to neurorehabilitation. Functional outcome (modified Rankin scale) at discharge, mortality rate and periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage served as primary outcome parameters. Door-to-imaging and door-to-needle times were secondary outcome parameters. In 2014-2019, 5,379 patients were treated for acute stroke with 477 receiving IVT. Most baseline characteristics were comparable over time. For all stroke patients, door-to-imaging times increased over the years, but significantly improved for potential IVT candidates and those finally treated with IVT. The percentage of patients with door-to-needle time <30 minutes increased from 10% to 25%. Clinical outcome at discharge improved for all stroke patients treated in the regional hospitals. Particularly for patients treated with IVT, good clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-2) at discharge increased from 2014 to 2019 by 19% and mortality rates dropped from 13% to 5%. 24h/7d telemedical support and regular on-site medical staff training within a structured telemedicine stroke network such as NEVAS significantly improve on-site stroke care in rural areas, leading to a considerable benefit in clinical outcome. Data access statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request and in compliance with the local and international ethical guidelines.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND. UNASSIGNED
Comprehensive stroke centers (CSC) offer state-of-the-art stroke care in metropolitan centers. However, in rural areas sufficient stroke expertise is much scarcer. Recently, telemedical stroke networks have offered instant consultation by stroke experts, enabling immediate administration of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) on-site and decision on thrombectomy. While these immediate decisions are made during the consult, the impact of the network structures on stroke care in spoke hospitals is still not well described.
AIMS. UNASSIGNED
This study was performed to determine if on-site performance in rural hospitals and patient outcome improve over time through participation and regular medical staff training within a telemedical stroke network.
METHODS. UNASSIGNED
In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from stroke patients treated in four regional hospitals within the telemedical Neurovascular Network of Southwest Bavaria (NEVAS) between 2014-2019. We only included those patients that were treated in the regional hospitals until discharge at home or to neurorehabilitation. Functional outcome (modified Rankin scale) at discharge, mortality rate and periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage served as primary outcome parameters. Door-to-imaging and door-to-needle times were secondary outcome parameters.
RESULTS. UNASSIGNED
In 2014-2019, 5,379 patients were treated for acute stroke with 477 receiving IVT. Most baseline characteristics were comparable over time. For all stroke patients, door-to-imaging times increased over the years, but significantly improved for potential IVT candidates and those finally treated with IVT. The percentage of patients with door-to-needle time <30 minutes increased from 10% to 25%. Clinical outcome at discharge improved for all stroke patients treated in the regional hospitals. Particularly for patients treated with IVT, good clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-2) at discharge increased from 2014 to 2019 by 19% and mortality rates dropped from 13% to 5%.
CONCLUSIONS. UNASSIGNED
24h/7d telemedical support and regular on-site medical staff training within a structured telemedicine stroke network such as NEVAS significantly improve on-site stroke care in rural areas, leading to a considerable benefit in clinical outcome. Data access statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request and in compliance with the local and international ethical guidelines.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38346936
doi: 10.1177/17474930241234259
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

17474930241234259

Auteurs

Ilias Masouris (I)

Department of Neurology, LMU University hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.

Lars Kellert (L)

Department of Neurology, LMU University hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.

Cauchy Pradhan (C)

Department of Neurology, LMU University hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.

Johannes Wischmann (J)

Department of Neurology, LMU University hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.

Roman Schniepp (R)

Department of Neurology, LMU University hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.

Robert Müller (R)

Department of Neurology and Neurological Rehabilitation, Bezirkskrankenhaus Guenzburg, Germany.

Leonard Fuhry (L)

Department of Neurology, Klinikum Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany.

Gerhard F Hamann (GF)

Department of Neurology and Neurological Rehabilitation, Bezirkskrankenhaus Guenzburg, Germany.

Thomas Pfefferkorn (T)

Department of Neurology, Klinikum Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany.

Jan Rémi (J)

Department of Neurology, LMU University hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Both authors contributed equally.

Florian Schöberl (F)

Department of Neurology, LMU University hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Both authors contributed equally.

Classifications MeSH