Pulmonary Physician Consultancy in Emergency Services in Turkiye (PuPCEST) - a cross-sectional multicenter study.
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Feb 2024
09 Feb 2024
Historique:
medline:
10
2
2024
pubmed:
9
2
2024
entrez:
9
2
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pulmonology is one of the branches that frequently receive consultation requests from the emergency department. Pulmonology consultation (PC) is requested from almost all clinical branches due to the diagnosis and treatment of any respiratory condition, preoperative evaluation, or postoperative pulmonary problems. The aim of our study was to describe the profile of the pulmonology consultations received from emergency departments in Turkiye. A total of 32 centers from Turkiye (the PuPCEST Study Group) were included to the study. The demographic, clinical, laboratory and radiological data of the consulted cases were examined. The final result of the consultation and the justification of the consultation by the consulting pulmonologist were recorded. We identified 1712 patients, 64% of which applied to the emergency department by themselves and 41.4% were women. Eighty-five percent of the patients had a previously diagnosed disease. Dyspnea was the reason for consultation in 34.7% of the cases. The leading radiological finding was consolidation (13%). Exacerbation of preexisting lung disease was present in 39% of patients. The most commonly established diagnoses by pulmonologists were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (19%) and pneumonia (12%). While 35% of the patients were discharged, 35% were interned into the chest diseases ward. The majority of patients were hospitalized and treated conservatively. It may be suggested that most of the applications would be evaluated in the pulmonology outpatient clinic which may result in a decrease in emergency department visits/consultations. Thus, improvements in the reorganization of the pulmonology outpatient clinics and follow-up visits may positively contribute emergency admission rates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38335404
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037165
pii: 00005792-202402090-00033
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e37165Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
Akpinar Y, Demirci H, Budak E, et al. Why do patients with minor complaints choose emergency departments and does satisfaction with primary care services influence their decisions? Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018;19:398–406.
Edirne T, Edirne Y, Atmaca B, et al. Yüzüncü Yil Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi Acil Servis hastalarinin özellikleri. Van Tip Dergisi. 2008;15:107–11.
Oktay C, Cete Y, Eray O, et al. Appropriateness of emergency department visits in a Turkish University Hospital. Croat Med J. 2003;44:585–91.
Wiener-Kronish JP, Albert RK. Preoperative evaluation. In: Murray JF, Nadel JA, W.B., eds. Textbook of Respiratory Medicine. Volume one. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Company; 2000:883–94.
Uçar N, Alpar S, Mutlu AG. Atatürk Göğüs Hastaliklari ve Göğüs Cerrahisi Merkezinden istenen göğüs hastaliklari konsültasyonlarinin değerlendirilmesi. Solunum Hastaliklari. 2000;11:160–4.
Woods RA, Lee R, Ospina MB, et al. Consultation outcomes in the emergency department: exploring rates and complexity. CJEM. 2008;10:25–31.
Ersel M, Karcioğlu O, Yanturali S, et al. Bir acil servisin kullanim özellikleri ve başvuran hastalarin aciliyetinin hekim ve hasta açisindan değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Acil Tip Dergisi. 2006;6:25–35.
Kiliçaslan I, Bozan H, Oktay C, et al. Türkiye’de acil servise başvuran hastalarin demografik özellikleri. Türkiye Acil Tip Dergisi. 2005;5:5–13.
Andrulis DP, Kellermann A, Hintz EA, et al. Emergency department and crowding in United States teaching hospitals. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20:980–6.
Gill JM, Mainous AG, Nsereko M. The effect of continuity of care on emergency department use. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:333–8.
Atamna A, Shiber S, Yassin M, et al. The accuracy of a diagnosis of pneumonia in the emergency department. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;89:62–5.
Fatihoglu E, Aydin S, Gokharman FD, et al. X-ray use in chest imaging in emergency department on the basis of cost and effectiveness. Acad Radiol. 2016;23:1239–45.
Korley FK, Pham JC, Kirsch TD. Use of advanced radiology during visits to US emergency departments for injury-related conditions, 1998-2007. JAMA. 2010;304:1465–71.
Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2078–86.
Griffey RT, Sodickson A. Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:887–92.