Prenatal counseling of an isolated fetal small head circumference during the second trimester expert ultrasound examination.

Fetal growth restriction Fetal ultrasound Genetics Head circumference Prenatal counseling

Journal

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
ISSN: 1872-7654
Titre abrégé: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 0375672

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 21 06 2023
revised: 15 11 2023
accepted: 08 01 2024
medline: 14 1 2024
pubmed: 14 1 2024
entrez: 13 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To evaluate perinatal and postnatal outcomes of fetuses with an isolated small head circumference (HC) on expert ultrasound examination in the second trimester for further recommendations in prenatal care. In a retrospective cohort we included singleton-pregnancies with a fetal HC > -3.0 SD and ≤ -1.64 SD determined on expert ultrasound examination between 18 and 24 weeks of gestational age. Three subgroups were determined: "isolated small HC (ISHC)", "small HC plus abdominal circumference (AC) ≤ p10 (SHC+)" and "small HC plus AC ≤ p10 and Doppler abnormalities (SHC + D)". After ultrasound examination, genetic testing was sometimes offered and postnatally genetic tests were performed on indication. We included 252 pregnancies: 109 ISHC, 104 SHC+, and 39 SHC + D. In the ISHC and SHC+ subgroup, 96 % of the fetuses were born alive and did not die neonatal. In the SH + D group this was only 38 %. In the SHC+ subgroup, less fetuses were delivered vaginal (non-instrumental) compared to the ISHC subgroup (61 % vs. 73 %, p < 0.01). In the ISHC and SHC+ subgroup s some fetuses were diagnosed with congenital defects (4 % vs. 10 %, p = 0.08) and with a genetic anomaly (6.4 % vs. 7.7 %, p = 0.13) after 24 weeks or postnatally. In SHC + D subgroups 5 % presented with congenital defects and 2.6 % with a genetic anomaly. We conclude that fetuses with a small HC without structural anomalies on second trimester expert ultrasound require follow-up and special medical attention. We recommend differentiating between ISHC, SHC+, and SHC + D for prenatal counseling. Genetic testing and referral to a clinical geneticist should be considered.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38218159
pii: S0301-2115(24)00010-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.01.010
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

58-64

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Sofie C Husen (SC)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: s.husen@erasmusmc.nl.

Eline F Visser (EF)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Malgorzata I Srebniak (MI)

Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Karin E M Diderich (KEM)

Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Irene A L Groenenberg (IAL)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen (RPM)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Attie T J I Go (ATJI)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH