Safety and Performance of the Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Detection Algorithm INSIGHT

detection algorithm inappropriate therapy oversensing pacemaker subcutaneous internal cardioverter-defibrillator

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 16 11 2023
revised: 17 12 2023
accepted: 18 12 2023
medline: 11 1 2024
pubmed: 11 1 2024
entrez: 11 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The use of the S-ICD is limited by its inability to provide backup pacing. Combined use of the S-ICD with a pacemaker may be a good choice in certain situations, yet current experience concerning the compatibility is limited. The goal of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of the S-ICD in patients with a pacemaker. A total of 74 consecutive patients with a bipolar pacemaker were prospectively enrolled. First, surface rhythm strips were recorded in all possible pacemaker stimulation modes, to screen for T-wave oversensing (TWOS). Second, a S-ICD functional dummy was placed epicutaneously on the patient in the typical implant position. The same standardized pacing protocol was used as mentioned above, and every stimulation mode was recorded via S-ECG in all vectors. In 16 patients (21.6%), programmed stimulation would have led to VT/VF detection. Triggered episodes were due to counting of the pacing spike(s), QRS complex, premature ventricular contractions, and/or additional TWOS. Three cases triggered in the bipolar stimulation mode. Oversensing was associated with lung emphysema and a reduced QRS amplitude in the S-ECG. The combination of an S-ICD and a pacemaker may lead to inadequate shock delivery due to oversensing, even under programmed bipolar stimulation. Oversensing cannot be sufficiently predicted by the screening tool in pacemaker patients. Testing with an epicutaneous S-ICD dummy in all vectors and stimulation settings is recommended in patients with pre-existing pacemakers.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The use of the S-ICD is limited by its inability to provide backup pacing. Combined use of the S-ICD with a pacemaker may be a good choice in certain situations, yet current experience concerning the compatibility is limited. The goal of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of the S-ICD in patients with a pacemaker.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 74 consecutive patients with a bipolar pacemaker were prospectively enrolled. First, surface rhythm strips were recorded in all possible pacemaker stimulation modes, to screen for T-wave oversensing (TWOS). Second, a S-ICD functional dummy was placed epicutaneously on the patient in the typical implant position. The same standardized pacing protocol was used as mentioned above, and every stimulation mode was recorded via S-ECG in all vectors.
RESULTS RESULTS
In 16 patients (21.6%), programmed stimulation would have led to VT/VF detection. Triggered episodes were due to counting of the pacing spike(s), QRS complex, premature ventricular contractions, and/or additional TWOS. Three cases triggered in the bipolar stimulation mode. Oversensing was associated with lung emphysema and a reduced QRS amplitude in the S-ECG.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The combination of an S-ICD and a pacemaker may lead to inadequate shock delivery due to oversensing, even under programmed bipolar stimulation. Oversensing cannot be sufficiently predicted by the screening tool in pacemaker patients. Testing with an epicutaneous S-ICD dummy in all vectors and stimulation settings is recommended in patients with pre-existing pacemakers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38202136
pii: jcm13010129
doi: 10.3390/jcm13010129
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Kay F Weipert (KF)

Department of Cardiology, Rhythmology and Angiology, Medizinische Klinik II, Diakonie Klinikum Jung Stilling, 57074 Siegen, Germany.

Srdjan Kostic (S)

Department of Cardiology, Kantonsspital Aarau, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland.

Timur Gökyildirim (T)

Department of Cardiology, Lahn-Dill Kliniken, 35578 Wetzlar, Germany.

Victoria Johnson (V)

Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, 35392 Giessen, Germany.

Ritvan Chasan (R)

Department of Cardiology, Rhythmology and Angiology, Medizinische Klinik II, Diakonie Klinikum Jung Stilling, 57074 Siegen, Germany.

Christopher Gemein (C)

Department of Cardiology, Nephrology, Pneumology and Rhythmology, Klinikum Aschaffenburg-Alzenau, 63739 Aschaffenburg, Germany.

Josef Rosenbauer (J)

Department of Cardiology, Rhythmology and Angiology, Medizinische Klinik II, Diakonie Klinikum Jung Stilling, 57074 Siegen, Germany.

Damir Erkapic (D)

Department of Cardiology, Rhythmology and Angiology, Medizinische Klinik II, Diakonie Klinikum Jung Stilling, 57074 Siegen, Germany.

Jörn Schmitt (J)

Department of Cardiology, Pneumology and Angiology, Medizinische Klinik II, Westpfalz-Klinikum, 67655 Kaiserslautern, Germany.

Classifications MeSH