Aseptic loosening of the option stemmed tibial tray in the Zimmer NexGen LPS total knee arthroplasty system.

Deformation Knee arthroplasty Polyethylene Retrieval analysis Tibial tray loosening

Journal

The Knee
ISSN: 1873-5800
Titre abrégé: Knee
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9430798

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 12 09 2023
revised: 05 12 2023
accepted: 08 12 2023
medline: 4 1 2024
pubmed: 4 1 2024
entrez: 3 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

We investigated the relationship between the backside deformation of polyethylene (PE) tibial inserts and aseptic loosening of the Option stemmed tibial tray used with Zimmer NexGen posterior-stabilised (PS) devices. We hypothesized that explanted inserts used in PS designs would exhibit greater extents of PE backside deformation than those used in equivalent cruciate retaining (CR) designs and that PE inserts retrieved from total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) revised for aseptic tibial tray loosening would exhibit greater extents of backside deformation than TKAs revised for other reasons. A total of 73 explanted fixed-bearing TKAs (42 CR and 31 PS) were examined. PE components underwent geometric examination with a coordinate measuring machine using validated techniques. Multiple regression modelling was used to identify variables associated with revision secondary to aseptic loosing and to determine factors associated with increased PE backside deformation. PE inserts retrieved from TKAs with aseptic loosening had significantly greater backside deformation than those retrieved from TKAs revised for other reasons (p < 0.001). Greater PE backside deformation was significantly associated with larger tray/insert clearance heights (p < 0.001), thinner inserts (p < 0.001) and PS TKAs (p = 0.001). PE backside deformation was significantly greater in the PS TKAs. This may provide one explanation for the increased rate of aseptic loosening reported with the Option tibial tray used with the Legacy Posterior Stabilised (LPS) system.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
We investigated the relationship between the backside deformation of polyethylene (PE) tibial inserts and aseptic loosening of the Option stemmed tibial tray used with Zimmer NexGen posterior-stabilised (PS) devices. We hypothesized that explanted inserts used in PS designs would exhibit greater extents of PE backside deformation than those used in equivalent cruciate retaining (CR) designs and that PE inserts retrieved from total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) revised for aseptic tibial tray loosening would exhibit greater extents of backside deformation than TKAs revised for other reasons.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 73 explanted fixed-bearing TKAs (42 CR and 31 PS) were examined. PE components underwent geometric examination with a coordinate measuring machine using validated techniques. Multiple regression modelling was used to identify variables associated with revision secondary to aseptic loosing and to determine factors associated with increased PE backside deformation.
RESULTS RESULTS
PE inserts retrieved from TKAs with aseptic loosening had significantly greater backside deformation than those retrieved from TKAs revised for other reasons (p < 0.001). Greater PE backside deformation was significantly associated with larger tray/insert clearance heights (p < 0.001), thinner inserts (p < 0.001) and PS TKAs (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
PE backside deformation was significantly greater in the PS TKAs. This may provide one explanation for the increased rate of aseptic loosening reported with the Option tibial tray used with the Legacy Posterior Stabilised (LPS) system.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38171206
pii: S0968-0160(23)00261-2
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2023.12.004
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-12

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: ‘None. R.M.B., S.R.W., M.E.N., S.S., and D.J.L. are ExplantLab employees. ExplantLab is a company which analyses removed orthopaedic products as a supplier to the National Health Service of the United Kingdom’.

Auteurs

Rohan M Bhalekar (RM)

ExplantLab, The Biosphere, Newcastle Helix, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 5BX, UK. Electronic address: rohan.bhalekar@gmail.com.

Stephen R Wells (SR)

ExplantLab, The Biosphere, Newcastle Helix, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 5BX, UK. Electronic address: stephen.r.wells1989@gmail.com.

Matthew Matthew Nargol (M)

ExplantLab, The Biosphere, Newcastle Helix, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 5BX, UK. Electronic address: nargol@live.co.uk.

Shahrzad Shariatpanahi (S)

ExplantLab, The Biosphere, Newcastle Helix, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 5BX, UK. Electronic address: shahrzadshariat@engineer.com.

Antoni V F Nargol (AVF)

University Hospital of North Tees, Hardwick Rd, Stockton-on-Tees TS19 8PE, UK.

Susan Waller (S)

University Hospital of North Tees, Hardwick Rd, Stockton-on-Tees TS19 8PE, UK. Electronic address: s.waller2@nhs.net.

Linda Wildberg (L)

University Hospital of North Tees, Hardwick Rd, Stockton-on-Tees TS19 8PE, UK. Electronic address: linda.wildberg@nhs.net.

Simon Tilley (S)

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire SO16 6YD, UK. Electronic address: Simon.Tilley@uhs.nhs.uk.

David J Langton (DJ)

ExplantLab, The Biosphere, Newcastle Helix, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 5BX, UK. Electronic address: djlangton22@doctors.org.uk.

Classifications MeSH