Trainee educational curriculum to standardize central venous catheter repair.
Central venous catheter
Central venous catheter repair
Pediatric Surgery
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Dec 2023
19 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
22
06
2023
accepted:
14
12
2023
medline:
20
12
2023
pubmed:
20
12
2023
entrez:
20
12
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Children may require durable central venous catheters (CVCs) for various reasons. CVC-related integrity complications are common and can often be repaired at the bedside to increase lifetime. Variability in repair techniques can lead to complications, including the need for repeat repair and Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infection (CLABSI). The impact of an educational curriculum to standardize tunneled CVC repairs for trainees on a pediatric surgery service was studied, focusing on comfort level with tunneled CVC repair and to determine the impact on complication rates. Rotating trainees studied a dedicated audiovisual educational curriculum comprised of a video, educational slides, and a practical component from November 2020 through January 2022. Experience and comfort level with tunneled CVC repairs were assessed before and after the rotation. CVCs repaired during the duration of the study were evaluated and compared to the period prior. Forty-nine individuals completed the pre- and post-training survey. Respondents (34.7%, n = 17) most commonly reported one year of surgical experience, and (79.6%, n = 39) had never observed or assisted in a repair previously. Following training, respondents felt more comfortable with all aspects of the CVC repair process (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in re-repair rates or CLABSI rates following the implementation of the curriculum. Tunneled CVC procedural repair variability can be standardized with a dedicated educational curriculum for rotating trainees, which improves knowledge and comfort with such procedures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38115058
doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04977-9
pii: 10.1186/s12909-023-04977-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
978Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Perdikaris P, Petsios K, Vasilatou-Kosmidis H, Matziou V. Complications of Hickman-Broviac catheters in children with malignancies. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2008;25(5):375–84.
doi: 10.1080/08880010802106622
Cesaro S, Cavaliere M, Pegoraro A, Gamba P, Zadra N, Tridello G. A comprehensive approach to the prevention of central venous catheter Complications: results of 10-year prospective surveillance in pediatric hematology-oncology patients. Ann Hematol. 2016;95(5):817–25.
doi: 10.1007/s00277-016-2634-x
Pinon M, Bezzio S, Tovo PA, et al. A prospective 7-year survey on central venous catheter-related Complications at a single pediatric hospital. Eur J Pediatr. 2009;168(12):1505–12.
doi: 10.1007/s00431-009-0968-2
Zens T, Nichol P, Leys C, Haines K, Brinkman A. Fractured pediatric central venous catheters - repair or replace? J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(1):165–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.023
Fletcher J, Woodham D, Cooper SC. Repair of central venous access devices in intestinal failure patients is safe and cost-effective: a retrospective single centre cohort study. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(6):4263–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.01.024
Yousef Y, Youssef F, Homsy M, et al. Standardization of care for pediatric perforated Appendicitis improves outcomes. J Pediatr Surg. 2017;52(12):1916–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.054
Willis ZI, Duggan EM, Bucher BT, et al. Effect of a clinical practice Guideline for Pediatric Complicated Appendicitis. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(5):e160194.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0194
Keren R, Luan X, Localio R, et al. Prioritization of comparative effectiveness research topics in hospital pediatrics. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(12):1155–64.
doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1266
Reznick RK, MacRae H. Teaching surgical skills–changes in the wind. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(25):2664–9.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra054785
Cook DA, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 2013;35(1):e867–98.
doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.714886
Robinson WP, Doucet DR, Simons JP et al. An intensive vascular surgical skills and simulation course for vascular trainees improves procedural knowledge and self-rated procedural competence. J Vasc Surg 2017; 65(3): 907 – 15 e3.
Ritter KA, Horne C, Nassar A, French JC, Prabhu AS, Lipman JM. Multidisciplinary Simulation Training improves Surgical Resident Comfort with Airway Management. J Surg Res. 2020;252:57–62.
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.02.008
Weingarten N, Byskosh A, Stocker B, et al. Simulation-based course improves Resident Comfort, Knowledge, and ability to Manage Surgical Intensive Care Unit patients. J Surg Res. 2020;256:355–63.
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.103
Skertich NJ, Schimpke SW, Lee T, et al. Pediatric Surgery Simulation-based training for the general Surgery Resident. J Surg Res. 2021;258:339–44.
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.038
Willis RE, Van Sickle KR. Current status of Simulation-based training in Graduate Medical Education. Surg Clin North Am. 2015;95(4):767–79.
doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2015.04.009
Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002;236(4):458–63. discussion 63 – 4.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008
McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med. 2011;86(6):706–11.
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217e119
Zendejas B, Cook DA, Bingener J, et al. Simulation-based mastery learning improves patient outcomes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2011;254(3):502–9. discussion 9–11.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822c6994
Augustine EM, Kahana M. Effect of procedure simulation workshops on resident procedural confidence and competence. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(4):479–85.
doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00019.1
Wang C, Karl R, Sharan L et al. Surgical training of minimally invasive mitral valve repair on a patient-specific Simulator improves Surgical skills. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2023.
Admire JR, Pounds LL, Adams AJ, Gomez PP, Willis RE. Development and construct validity of a low-fidelity training platform for driving large and small suture needles. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(3):387–93.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.10.009
Gomez PP, Willis RE, Van Sickle KR. Development of a virtual reality robotic surgical curriculum using the Da Vinci Si surgical system. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(8):2171–9.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3914-y
ACGME. Defined Category Minimum numbers for general surgery residents and Credit role. 2019. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/definedcategoryminimumnumbersforgeneralsurgeryresidentsandcreditrole.pdf (accessed April 24, 2023.
Patel EA, Aydin A, Desai A, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Current status of simulation-based training in pediatric Surgery: a systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(9):1884–93.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.11.019
Barsness K. Simulation-based education and performance assessments for pediatric surgeons. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2014;24(4):303–7.
doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1386650
Fratino G, Castagnola E, Carlini C, et al. A single institution observational study of early mechanical Complications in central venous catheters (valved and open-ended) in children with cancer. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;20(9):704–7.
doi: 10.1007/s00383-004-1279-3
Rinke ML, Chen AR, Bundy DG, et al. Implementation of a central line maintenance care bundle in hospitalized pediatric oncology patients. Pediatrics. 2012;130(4):e996–e1004.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0295