Patient perspectives of using reproductive autonomy to measure quality of care: a qualitative study.


Journal

BMC women's health
ISSN: 1472-6874
Titre abrégé: BMC Womens Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088690

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 08 03 2023
accepted: 24 11 2023
medline: 6 12 2023
pubmed: 5 12 2023
entrez: 4 12 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Current measures of reproductive health care quality, such as rates of "unintended" pregnancies, neglect to incorporate patients' desires and center their reproductive autonomy. This study explores patients' perspectives on and receptivity to alternative metrics for measuring quality of such care. An online research recruitment firm identified eligible participants living in New York, ages 18-45, self-identifying as women, and having visited a primary care provider in the last year. We conducted five virtual focus groups and eight in-depth interviews with participants (N = 30) in 2021. Semi-structured guides queried on ideal clinic interactions when preventing or attempting pregnancy and their perspectives on how to measure the quality of such encounters, including receptivity to using our definition of reproductive autonomy to develop one such metric: "whether the patient got the reproductive health service or counseling that they wanted to get, while having all the information about and access to their options, and not feeling forced into anything." We employed an inductive thematic analysis. Participants wanted care that was non-judgmental, respectful, and responsive to their needs and preferences. For pregnancy prevention, many preferred unbiased information about contraceptive options to help make their own decisions. For pregnancy, many desired comprehensive information and more provider support. There was considerable support for using reproductive autonomy to measure quality of care. Patients had distinct desires in their preferred approach to discussions about preventing versus attempting pregnancy. Quality of reproductive health care should be measured from the patient's perspective. Given participants' demonstrated support, future research is needed to develop and test a new metric that assesses patients' perceptions of reproductive autonomy during clinical encounters.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Current measures of reproductive health care quality, such as rates of "unintended" pregnancies, neglect to incorporate patients' desires and center their reproductive autonomy. This study explores patients' perspectives on and receptivity to alternative metrics for measuring quality of such care.
METHODS METHODS
An online research recruitment firm identified eligible participants living in New York, ages 18-45, self-identifying as women, and having visited a primary care provider in the last year. We conducted five virtual focus groups and eight in-depth interviews with participants (N = 30) in 2021. Semi-structured guides queried on ideal clinic interactions when preventing or attempting pregnancy and their perspectives on how to measure the quality of such encounters, including receptivity to using our definition of reproductive autonomy to develop one such metric: "whether the patient got the reproductive health service or counseling that they wanted to get, while having all the information about and access to their options, and not feeling forced into anything." We employed an inductive thematic analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
Participants wanted care that was non-judgmental, respectful, and responsive to their needs and preferences. For pregnancy prevention, many preferred unbiased information about contraceptive options to help make their own decisions. For pregnancy, many desired comprehensive information and more provider support. There was considerable support for using reproductive autonomy to measure quality of care.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Patients had distinct desires in their preferred approach to discussions about preventing versus attempting pregnancy. Quality of reproductive health care should be measured from the patient's perspective. Given participants' demonstrated support, future research is needed to develop and test a new metric that assesses patients' perceptions of reproductive autonomy during clinical encounters.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38049782
doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02804-3
pii: 10.1186/s12905-023-02804-3
pmc: PMC10696671
doi:

Substances chimiques

Contraceptive Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

647

Subventions

Organisme : Professional Staff Congress of the City University of New York
ID : TRADB-51-289
Organisme : Professional Staff Congress of the City University of New York
ID : TRADB-51-289

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Reprod Health. 2018 Aug 28;15(1):144
pubmed: 30153846
Contraception. 2019 Mar;99(3):187-191
pubmed: 30471263
Am J Public Health. 2016 Nov;106(11):1932-1937
pubmed: 27631741
Contraception. 2018 Jan;97(1):34-40
pubmed: 28935217
Contraception. 2013 Aug;88(2):250-6
pubmed: 23177265
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Sep 1;182(9):897-898
pubmed: 35913723
Gates Open Res. 2017 Nov 6;1:1
pubmed: 29355215
Am J Public Health. 2005 Jul;95(7):1128-38
pubmed: 15983269
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022 Nov 28;3(1):973-981
pubmed: 36636316
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):691-702
pubmed: 30342632
Stud Fam Plann. 2014 Mar;45(1):19-41
pubmed: 24615573
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Sep;48(3):147-51
pubmed: 27513444
Fam Pract. 2023 Mar 28;40(2):402-406
pubmed: 36124892
Science. 2023 Jun 30;380(6652):1329
pubmed: 37384685
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):843-52
pubmed: 26962904
Womens Health Issues. 2017 Sep - Oct;27(5):539-545
pubmed: 28412049
Contraception. 2019 Jul;100(1):1-4
pubmed: 30851238
Stud Fam Plann. 2020 Jun;51(2):161-176
pubmed: 32358789
Qual Health Res. 2017 Mar;27(4):591-608
pubmed: 27670770

Auteurs

Meredith G Manze (MG)

City University of New York, Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, 55 W 125th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA. Meredith.manze@sph.cuny.edu.

Silpa Srinivasulu (S)

City University of New York, Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, 55 W 125th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA.

Heidi E Jones (HE)

City University of New York, Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, 55 W 125th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH