Sex differences in outcomes of exercise therapy for patients with intermittent claudication: A scoping review.

Exercise therapy is first-line treatment for intermittent claudication due to peripheral artery disease. We sought to synthesize the literature on sex differences in response to exercise therapy for the treatment of intermittent claudication due to peripheral artery disease. A scoping review was performed (1997 to 2023) using Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Embase, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science. Articles were included if they were a scientific report of any measures of health-related quality of life or walking performance after an intervention that included a structured walking program. Of the 13 studies, 11 included measures of walking distance; 7 included measures of walking time, 5 included measures of walking speed, and 4 included quality of life measures. Overall, exercise therapy resulted in significant improvements across most measures of walking performance for both men and females. When comparing magnitudes of outcome improvement by sex, results of walking-based measures were contradictory; some studies noted no difference and others found superior outcomes for men. Results of quality of life-based measures were also contradictory, with some finding no difference and others reporting substantially more improvement for females. Both men and females experienced considerable improvement in walking performance and quality of life with exercise therapy. Evidence regarding the differential effect of exercise therapy on outcomes by sex for intermittent claudication is limited and contradictory. Further efforts should be directed at using standardized interventions and metrics for measuring the outcomes that match the indications for intervention in these patients to better understand the expected benefits and any variance according to sex.

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.