Relationship Between Pain and Disability Among Stroke Patients.
Disability
Shoulder Pain
Stroke
Journal
Anesthesiology and pain medicine
ISSN: 2228-7531
Titre abrégé: Anesth Pain Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101585412
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
14
03
2023
revised:
08
04
2023
accepted:
12
04
2023
medline:
29
11
2023
pubmed:
29
11
2023
entrez:
29
11
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Stroke is prevalent in Iran, and its complications can decline patients' quality of life and psychological state. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between pain following stroke (PFS) and disability in stroke patients. The current case-control study was conducted on 184 stroke patients (92 cases and 92 controls). Data collection tools included a demographic questionnaire, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Based on the medical files of all patients with stroke, eligible ones were invited to participate in the study via phone calls. The collected data were then analyzed. The disability rate was higher in the case group of patients with a history of hemorrhagic stroke, smoking, stroke, and diabetes (P < 0.05). The mean ± SD age was 72.45 (11.54). Also, the level of disability in patients increased with age (P = 0.000). The mean ± SD disability score was 78.63 (6.92) in patients with PFS and 54.9 (10.87) in patients without PFS. Also, R = 0.795 and R The prevalence of disability was higher in patients with higher PFS levels. Hence, drug interventions or rehabilitation programs can be used to reduce the disability of stroke patients.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Stroke is prevalent in Iran, and its complications can decline patients' quality of life and psychological state.
Objectives
UNASSIGNED
This study aimed to investigate the relationship between pain following stroke (PFS) and disability in stroke patients.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
The current case-control study was conducted on 184 stroke patients (92 cases and 92 controls). Data collection tools included a demographic questionnaire, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Based on the medical files of all patients with stroke, eligible ones were invited to participate in the study via phone calls. The collected data were then analyzed.
Results
UNASSIGNED
The disability rate was higher in the case group of patients with a history of hemorrhagic stroke, smoking, stroke, and diabetes (P < 0.05). The mean ± SD age was 72.45 (11.54). Also, the level of disability in patients increased with age (P = 0.000). The mean ± SD disability score was 78.63 (6.92) in patients with PFS and 54.9 (10.87) in patients without PFS. Also, R = 0.795 and R
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
The prevalence of disability was higher in patients with higher PFS levels. Hence, drug interventions or rehabilitation programs can be used to reduce the disability of stroke patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38021327
doi: 10.5812/aapm-136330
pmc: PMC10664167
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e136330Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Rahmatian et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Funding or research support: None; Employment: Ilam University of Medical Sciences; Personal financial interests: None; Stocks or shares in companies: None; Consultation fees: None; Patents: None; Personal or professional relations with organizations and individuals (parents and children, wife and husband, family relationships, etc.): None; Unpaid membership in a government or non-governmental organization: None; Are you one of the editorial board members or a reviewer of this journal? None.
Références
Acupunct Med. 2020 Jun;38(3):150-157
pubmed: 32009422
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Sep;65(5):101602
pubmed: 34757009
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 16;380(20):1906-1917
pubmed: 31091372
Int J Stroke. 2020 Jun;15(4):399-411
pubmed: 31092151
Clin Rehabil. 2008 Aug;22(8):749-57
pubmed: 18678575
Circulation. 2015 Jan 27;131(4):e29-322
pubmed: 25520374
Front Neurol. 2019 Aug 21;10:907
pubmed: 31496987
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jul;84(7):968-72
pubmed: 12881818
Peptides. 2020 Apr;126:170265
pubmed: 31982448
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2021 Aug;31(7):1091-1104
pubmed: 32419606
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 07;378(23):2191-2201
pubmed: 29766772
Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Jul;9(4):2211-2220
pubmed: 32692235
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2021 Mar;31(2):278-292
pubmed: 31854264
Iran J Public Health. 2014 Apr;43(4):523-8
pubmed: 26005663
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Jun 1;31(5):385-392
pubmed: 30165650
J Relig Health. 2019 Apr;58(2):465-475
pubmed: 30610514
Occup Ther Health Care. 2018 Apr;32(2):154-171
pubmed: 29578827
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018 Feb 26;2018:4923062
pubmed: 29681974
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 04;20(2):
pubmed: 36673661
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Mar;18(3):338-346
pubmed: 33250442
BMC Neurol. 2009 Jul 21;9:35
pubmed: 19622138
Int J Stroke. 2021 Oct;16(7):818-827
pubmed: 33283685
Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Nov;38(11):1799-1806
pubmed: 33648417
Complement Ther Med. 2020 Aug;52:102515
pubmed: 32951759
Stroke. 2020 Mar;51(3):792-799
pubmed: 32078486
Front Neurol. 2019 Oct 04;10:1032
pubmed: 31636598
Brain Behav. 2023 Jan;13(1):e2858
pubmed: 36542540
Brain Res Bull. 2021 Oct;175:130-135
pubmed: 34329730
Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(3):190-202
pubmed: 26505983
Am J Ind Med. 2012 Jul;55(7):605-15
pubmed: 22213435
J Med Life. 2022 Apr;15(4):499-503
pubmed: 35646181
J Relig Health. 2020 Apr;59(2):1115-1125
pubmed: 31087227
Pain Med. 2021 Dec 11;22(12):2974-2989
pubmed: 33624814