Does prehabilitation before esophagectomy improve postoperative outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

complications esophageal cancer esophageal cancer surgery esophageal surgery esophageal tumor esophagectomy esophagogastrectomy esophagus carcinoma oesophageal cancer oesophageal cancer surgery oesophageal surgery oesophageal tumor oesophagectomy oesophagogastrectomy oesophagus carcinoma perioperative care preoperative exercise rehabilitation rehabilitation medicine

Journal

Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus
ISSN: 1442-2050
Titre abrégé: Dis Esophagus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8809160

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 16 10 2023
revised: 07 11 2023
accepted: 14 11 2023
medline: 29 11 2023
pubmed: 29 11 2023
entrez: 29 11 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is associated with high morbidity. It remains unclear whether prehabilitation, a strategy aimed at optimizing patients' physical and mental functioning prior to surgery, improves postoperative outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of prehabilitation on post-operative outcomes after esophagectomy. Data sources included Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PEDro, with information from 1 January 2000 to 5 August 2023. The analysis included randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared prehabilitation interventions to standard care prior to esophagectomy. A random effects model was used to generate a pooled estimate for pairwise meta-analysis, meta-analysis of proportions, and meta-analysis of means. A total of 1803 patients were included with 584 in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1219 in observational studies. In the randomized evidence, there were no significant differences between prehabilitation and control in the odds of postoperative pneumonia (15.0 vs. 18.9%, odds ratio (OR) 1.06 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66;1.72]) or pulmonary complications (14 vs. 25.6%, OR 0.68 [95% CI: 0.32;1.45]). In the observational data, there was a reduction in both postoperative pneumonia (22.5 vs. 32.9%, OR 0.48 [95% CI: 0.28;0.83]) and pulmonary complications (26.1 vs. 52.3%, OR 0.35 [95% CI: 0.17;0.75]) with prehabilitation. Hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (days), operative mortality, and severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) did not differ between groups in both the randomized data and observational data. Prehabilitation demonstrated reductions in postoperative pneumonia and pulmonary complications in observational studies, but not RCTs. The overall certainty of these findings is limited by the low quality of the available evidence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38018252
pii: 7453427
doi: 10.1093/dote/doad066
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Kevin R An (KR)

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Vanessa Seijas (V)

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Division of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Ageing, Functioning Epidemiology, and Implementation, Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation in Health Research Group, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.

Michael S Xu (MS)

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Linda Grüßer (L)

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Sapna Humar (S)

Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Amabelle A Moreno (AA)

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital, Manila, The Philippines.

Marvee Turk (M)

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Koushik Kasanagottu (K)

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.

Talal Alzghari (T)

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Arnaldo Dimagli (A)

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Michael A Ko (MA)

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Joseph's Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Jonathan Villena-Vargas (J)

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Stefania Papatheodorou (S)

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.

Mario F L Gaudino (MFL)

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Classifications MeSH