Impact and cost-effectiveness of measles vaccination through microarray patches in 70 low-income and middle-income countries: mathematical modelling and early-stage economic evaluation.


Journal

BMJ global health
ISSN: 2059-7908
Titre abrégé: BMJ Glob Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101685275

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2023
Historique:
received: 06 03 2023
accepted: 01 10 2023
medline: 13 11 2023
pubmed: 11 11 2023
entrez: 10 11 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Microarray patches (MAPs) are a promising technology being developed to reduce barriers to vaccine delivery based on needles and syringes (N&S). To address the evidence gap on the public health value of applying this potential technology to immunisation programmes, we evaluated the health impact on measles burden and cost-effectiveness of introducing measles-rubella MAPs (MR-MAPs) in 70 low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We used an age-structured dynamic model of measles transmission and vaccination to project measles cases, deaths and disability-adjusted life-years during 2030-2040. Compared with the baseline scenarios with continuing current N&S-based practice, we evaluated the introduction of MR-MAPs under different measles vaccine coverage projections and MR-MAP introduction strategies. Costs were calculated based on the ingredients approach, including direct cost of measles treatment, vaccine procurement and vaccine delivery. Model-based burden and cost estimates were derived for individual countries and country income groups. We compared the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of introducing MR-MAPs to health opportunity costs. MR-MAP introduction could prevent 27%-37% of measles burden between 2030 and 2040 in 70 LMICs, compared with the N&S-only immunisation strategy. The largest health impact could be achieved under lower coverage projection and accelerated introduction strategy, with 39 million measles cases averted. Measles treatment cost is a key driver of the net cost of introduction. In countries with a relatively higher income, introducing MR-MAPs could be a cost-saving intervention due to reduced treatment costs. Compared with country-specific health opportunity costs, introducing MR-MAPs would be cost-effective in 16%-81% of LMICs, depending on the MR-MAPs procurement prices and vaccine coverage projections. Introducing MR-MAPs in LMICs can be a cost-effective strategy to revitalise measles immunisation programmes with stagnant uptake and reach undervaccinated children. Sustainable introduction and uptake of MR-MAPs has the potential to improve vaccine equity within and between countries and accelerate progress towards measles elimination.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Microarray patches (MAPs) are a promising technology being developed to reduce barriers to vaccine delivery based on needles and syringes (N&S). To address the evidence gap on the public health value of applying this potential technology to immunisation programmes, we evaluated the health impact on measles burden and cost-effectiveness of introducing measles-rubella MAPs (MR-MAPs) in 70 low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).
METHODS
We used an age-structured dynamic model of measles transmission and vaccination to project measles cases, deaths and disability-adjusted life-years during 2030-2040. Compared with the baseline scenarios with continuing current N&S-based practice, we evaluated the introduction of MR-MAPs under different measles vaccine coverage projections and MR-MAP introduction strategies. Costs were calculated based on the ingredients approach, including direct cost of measles treatment, vaccine procurement and vaccine delivery. Model-based burden and cost estimates were derived for individual countries and country income groups. We compared the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of introducing MR-MAPs to health opportunity costs.
RESULTS
MR-MAP introduction could prevent 27%-37% of measles burden between 2030 and 2040 in 70 LMICs, compared with the N&S-only immunisation strategy. The largest health impact could be achieved under lower coverage projection and accelerated introduction strategy, with 39 million measles cases averted. Measles treatment cost is a key driver of the net cost of introduction. In countries with a relatively higher income, introducing MR-MAPs could be a cost-saving intervention due to reduced treatment costs. Compared with country-specific health opportunity costs, introducing MR-MAPs would be cost-effective in 16%-81% of LMICs, depending on the MR-MAPs procurement prices and vaccine coverage projections.
CONCLUSIONS
Introducing MR-MAPs in LMICs can be a cost-effective strategy to revitalise measles immunisation programmes with stagnant uptake and reach undervaccinated children. Sustainable introduction and uptake of MR-MAPs has the potential to improve vaccine equity within and between countries and accelerate progress towards measles elimination.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37949503
pii: bmjgh-2023-012204
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012204
pmc: PMC10649680
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Vaccines 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
ID : INV-009125
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Nature. 2021 Jan;589(7842):415-419
pubmed: 33328634
Vaccine. 2022 Jan 21;40(2):175-177
pubmed: 34865872
Vaccine. 2019 Jul 26;37(32):4427-4434
pubmed: 31262587
Vaccine. 2022 Mar 15;40(12):1681-1690
pubmed: 35164990
Vaccine. 2021 Jul 22;39(32):4564-4570
pubmed: 33744046
Drugs R D. 2016 Dec;16(4):327-338
pubmed: 27696306
World Health Stat Q. 1988;41(2):59-63
pubmed: 3176515
J Infect Dis. 2011 Jul;204 Suppl 1:S98-106
pubmed: 21666220
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jul 26;17(7):e1009098
pubmed: 34310590
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 12;11(12):e0167160
pubmed: 27941976
Lancet. 2021 Jan 30;397(10272):398-408
pubmed: 33516338
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Jan 03;35(Suppl 1):3
pubmed: 32373254
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Apr;7(4):e472-e481
pubmed: 30797735
BMC Med. 2023 Jul 4;21(1):229
pubmed: 37400797
Health Policy Plan. 2022 Jan 13;37(1):45-54
pubmed: 34410385
BMC Med. 2021 Nov 17;19(1):281
pubmed: 34784922
J Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 5;218(1):124-132
pubmed: 29701813
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Dec 1;94(12):925-930
pubmed: 27994285
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Feb 1;35(1):107-114
pubmed: 31625564
Clin Ther. 2020 Jan;42(1):44-59.e2
pubmed: 31955967
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 02;10:809675
pubmed: 35309224
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 16;10:1037157
pubmed: 36726626
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 May;36(5):509-522
pubmed: 29427072
Value Health. 2019 Sep;22(9):1026-1032
pubmed: 31511179
Lancet. 2021 Aug 7;398(10299):522-534
pubmed: 34273292
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;39 Suppl 1:i48-55
pubmed: 20348126
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Dec;17(12):e420-e428
pubmed: 28757186
PLoS Med. 2020 Mar 17;17(3):e1003024
pubmed: 32181756
Vaccine. 2020 Jan 16;38(3):460-469
pubmed: 31732326

Auteurs

Han Fu (H)

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK Han.Fu@lshtm.ac.uk.
Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Kaja Abbas (K)

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.

Stefano Malvolti (S)

MMGH Consulting GmbH, Zurich, Switzerland.

Christopher Gregory (C)

Immunization Unit, Programme Division, UNICEF, New York, New York, USA.

Melissa Ko (M)

MMGH Consulting GmbH, Zurich, Switzerland.

Jean-Pierre Amorij (JP)

Supply Division, Vaccine Centre, UNICEF, Kobenhavn, Denmark.

Mark Jit (M)

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH