Mobilizing Patient and Public Involvement in the Development of Real-World Digital Technology Solutions: Tutorial.
digital mobility measures
digital mobility outcomes
patient engagement
patient involvement
public-private partnership
real-world mobility
research consortium
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 10 2023
27 10 2023
Historique:
received:
21
11
2022
accepted:
31
08
2023
revised:
09
08
2023
medline:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
27
10
2023
entrez:
27
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although the value of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) activities in the development of new interventions and tools is well known, little guidance exists on how to perform these activities in a meaningful way. This is particularly true within large research consortia that target multiple objectives, include multiple patient groups, and work across many countries. Without clear guidance, there is a risk that PPIE may not capture patient opinions and needs correctly, thereby reducing the usefulness and effectiveness of new tools. Mobilise-D is an example of a large research consortium that aims to develop new digital outcome measures for real-world walking in 4 patient cohorts. Mobility is an important indicator of physical health. As such, there is potential clinical value in being able to accurately measure a person's mobility in their daily life environment to help researchers and clinicians better track changes and patterns in a person's daily life and activities. To achieve this, there is a need to create new ways of measuring walking. Recent advancements in digital technology help researchers meet this need. However, before any new measure can be used, researchers, health care professionals, and regulators need to know that the digital method is accurate and both accepted by and produces meaningful outcomes for patients and clinicians. Therefore, this paper outlines how PPIE structures were developed in the Mobilise-D consortium, providing details about the steps taken to implement PPIE, the experiences PPIE contributors had within this process, the lessons learned from the experiences, and recommendations for others who may want to do similar work in the future. The work outlined in this paper provided the Mobilise-D consortium with a foundation from which future PPIE tasks can be created and managed with clearly defined collaboration between researchers and patient representatives across Europe. This paper provides guidance on the work required to set up PPIE structures within a large consortium to promote and support the creation of meaningful and efficient PPIE related to the development of digital mobility outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37889531
pii: v25i1e44206
doi: 10.2196/44206
pmc: PMC10638632
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e44206Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 301677
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
©Alison Keogh, Ríona Mc Ardle, Mara Gabriela Diaconu, Nadir Ammour, Valdo Arnera, Federica Balzani, Gavin Brittain, Ellen Buckley, Sara Buttery, Alma Cantu, Solange Corriol-Rohou, Laura Delgado-Ortiz, Jacques Duysens, Tom Forman-Hardy, Tova Gur-Arieh, Dominique Hamerlijnck, John Linnell, Letizia Leocani, Tom McQuillan, Isabel Neatrour, Ashley Polhemus, Werner Remmele, Isabel Saraiva, Kirsty Scott, Norman Sutton, Koen van den Brande, Beatrix Vereijken, Martin Wohlrab, Lynn Rochester, Mobilise-D consortium. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 27.10.2023.
Références
Health Commun. 2019 Oct;34(11):1320-1328
pubmed: 29889560
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Oct 27;6:63
pubmed: 33133636
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 02;16(19):
pubmed: 31581632
Digit Biomark. 2019 Aug 16;3(2):92-102
pubmed: 32095769
Gerontologist. 2010 Aug;50(4):443-50
pubmed: 20145017
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Oct 09;5:270
pubmed: 30356834
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 20;18(14):
pubmed: 34300136
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 11;7(1):73
pubmed: 34635179
J R Soc Med. 2019 Nov;112(11):456-458
pubmed: 31347947
NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2(1):
pubmed: 30868107
Nat Rev Neurol. 2022 Aug;18(8):449-450
pubmed: 35768654
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 30;7(1):77
pubmed: 34717755
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Aug 17;5:230
pubmed: 30175100
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Apr 19;8(1):15
pubmed: 35440013
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Nov 08;5:310
pubmed: 30467543
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 2;11(12):e050785
pubmed: 34857567
BMJ. 2017 Aug 2;358:j3453
pubmed: 28768629
BMC Med. 2020 Apr 13;18(1):79
pubmed: 32279658
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Jul 22;3:877598
pubmed: 36189025
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 20;8:811855
pubmed: 35127766
J R Soc Med. 2020 Jan;113(1):16-23
pubmed: 31922447
Age Ageing. 2023 Jan 8;52(1):
pubmed: 36729471
J Big Data. 2020;7(1):38
pubmed: 32834926
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Jul 31;1:6
pubmed: 29062495
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 28;17(1):33
pubmed: 30922339
Patterns (N Y). 2022 Jun 10;3(6):100506
pubmed: 35755870
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Sep;7(5):947-950
pubmed: 34598912
BMJ. 2018 Nov 28;363:k4738
pubmed: 30487232
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Aug;62(7):945-952
pubmed: 29512139
Digit Biomark. 2020 Sep 15;4(3):69-77
pubmed: 33083687
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Aug 23;7(1):57
pubmed: 34425911
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 27;2:15
pubmed: 29062516
BMJ Open. 2022 May 2;12(5):e059400
pubmed: 35501096
Digit Biomark. 2020 Nov 26;4(Suppl 1):13-27
pubmed: 33442578