Environmental taxes and environmental quality in Canada.
Canada
Environmental quality
Environmental taxes
N-ARDL, Gradual shift causality
Journal
Environmental science and pollution research international
ISSN: 1614-7499
Titre abrégé: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9441769
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
24
07
2023
accepted:
18
10
2023
medline:
29
11
2023
pubmed:
25
10
2023
entrez:
24
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This paper aims to capture the effect of environmentally related taxes on environmental quality in Canada while controlling economic growth, financial development, and energy consumption over the period of 1990Q1 to 2020Q4. The present study employs novel econometric approaches, namely, the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (N-ARDL) test and the gradual shift causality (GS-C) test. The outcomes of the study reveal that (i) there is long-run cointegration equation between environmental taxes (E-TAX), carbon dioxide emissions (CO
Identifiants
pubmed: 37875759
doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30616-3
pii: 10.1007/s11356-023-30616-3
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carbon Dioxide
142M471B3J
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
117862-117870Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Abosedra S, Fakih A, Ghosh S, Kanjilal K (2023) Financial development and business cycle volatility nexus in the UAE: evidence from nonlinear regime-shift and asymmetric tests. Int J Financ Econ 28(3):2729–2741
doi: 10.1002/ijfe.2560
Adedoyin FF, Bekun FV, Eluwole KK, Adams S (2022) Modelling the nexus between financial development, FDI, and CO2 emission: does institutional quality matter? Energies 15(20):7464
doi: 10.3390/en15207464
Agboola PO, Bekun FV, Agozie DQ, Gyamfi BA (2022) Environmental sustainability and ecological balance dilemma: accounting for the role of institutional quality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(49):74554–74568
doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21103-2
Bhat AA, Mishra PP (2020) Evaluating the performance of carbon tax on green technology: evidence from India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:2226–2237
doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06666-x
Broock WA, Scheinkman JA, Dechert WD, LeBaron B (1996) A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Econ Rev 15(3):197–235
doi: 10.1080/07474939608800353
Cheng G, Zhao C, Iqbal N, Gülmez Ö, Işik H, Kirikkaleli D (2021) Does energy productivity and public-private investment in energy achieve carbon neutrality target of China? J Environ Manag 298:113464
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113464
Chien F, Sadiq M, Nawaz MA, Hussain MS, Tran TD, Le Thanh T (2021) A step toward reducing air pollution in top Asian economies: the role of green energy, eco-innovation, and environmental taxes. J Environ Manag 297:113420
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113420
Enders W, Lee J (2012) A unit root test using a Fourier series to approximate smooth breaks. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 74(4):574–599
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2011.00662.x
Ghazouani A, Jebli MB, Shahzad U (2021) Impacts of environmental taxes and technologies on greenhouse gas emissions: contextual evidence from leading emitter European countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:22758–22767
doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11911-9
Green JF (2021) Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses. Environ Res Lett 16(4):043004
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9
Haites E (2018) Carbon taxes and greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: what have we learned? Clim Pol 18(8):955–966
doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1492897
Haites E, Maosheng D, Gallagher KS, Mascher S, Narassimhan E (2018) Experience with carbon taxes and greenhouse gas emissions trading system. Duke Environ Law Policy Forum 29:109–182
Hammond W, Axsen J, Kjeang E (2020) How to slash greenhouse gas emissions in the freight sector: policy insights from a technology-adoption model of Canada. Energy Policy 137:111093
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111093
Hassan M, Oueslati W, Rousselière D (2020) Environmental taxes, reforms and economic growth: an empirical analysis of panel data. Econ Syst 44(3):100806
doi: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100806
Kartal MT, Kirikkaleli D, Kılıç Depren S (2023a) Investigating political stability effect on the environment in the Netherlands by Fourier-based approaches. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology:1–12
Kartal MT, Pata UK, Kılıç Depren S, Erdogan S (2023b) Time, frequency, and quantile-based impacts of disaggregated electricity generation on carbon neutrality: evidence from leading European Union countries. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology:1–19
Kirikkaleli D, Castanho RA, Özbay RD, Genc SY, Ahmed Z (2023a) Does resource efficiency matter for environmental quality in Canada? Frontiers in Environmental Science 11:1276632
doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1276632
Kirikkaleli D, Sofuoğlu E, Ojekemi O (2023b) Does patents on environmental technologies matter for the ecological footprint in the USA? Evidence from the novel Fourier ARDL approach. Geosci Front 101564
Lau CK, Patel G, Mahalik MK, Sahoo BK, Gozgor G (2023) Effectiveness of fiscal and monetary policies in promoting environmental quality: evidence from five large emerging economies. Emerg Mark Financ Trade:1–13
Liu L, Huang CZ, Huang G, Baetz B, Pittendrigh SM (2018) How a carbon tax will affect an emission-intensive economy: a case study of the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada. Energy 159:817–826
doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.163
Liu L, Pang L, Wu H, Hafeez M, Salahodjaev R (2023a) Does environmental policy stringency influence CO2 emissions in the Asia Pacific region? A nonlinear perspective. Air Qual Atmos Health:1–10
Liu B, Hu R, Ullah S (2023b) Energy technology innovation through the lens of the financial deepening: financial institutions and markets perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–10
Loganathan N, Mursitama TN, Pillai LLK, Khan A, Taha R (2020) The effects of total factor of productivity, natural resources and green taxation on CO2 emissions in Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:45121–45132
doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10291-4
McKitrick, R., & Aliakbari, E. (2021). Estimated impacts of a $170 carbon tax in Canada.
Meng Q, Zhang JW, Wang Y, Chang HL, Su CW (2023) Green household technology and its impacts on environmental sustainability in China. Sustainability 15(17):12919
doi: 10.3390/su151712919
Nazlioglu S, Gormus NA, Soytas U (2016) Oil prices and real estate investment trusts (REITs): gradual-shift causality and volatility transmission analysis. Energy Econ 60:168–175
doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.09.009
Ozgur O, Yilanci V, Kongkuah M (2022) Nuclear energy consumption and CO2 emissions in India: evidence from Fourier ARDL bounds test approach. Nucl Eng Technol 54(5):1657–1663
doi: 10.1016/j.net.2021.11.001
Pata UK, Yilanci V, Zhang Q, Shah SAR (2022) Does financial development promote renewable energy consumption in the USA? Evidence from the Fourier-wavelet quantile causality test. Renew Energy 196:432–443
doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.008
Sen S, Vollebergh H (2018) The effectiveness of taxing the carbon content of energy consumption. J Environ Econ Manag 92:74–99
doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.08.017
Shahbaz M, Gozgor G, Hammoudeh S (2019) Human capital and export diversification as new determinants of energy demand in the United States. Energy Econ 78:335–349
doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.11.016
Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo M (2014) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In: Horrace W, Sickles R (eds) The Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt: Econometric Methods and Applications. Springer, New York, pp 281–314
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9
Toda HY, Yamamoto T (1995) Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econ 66(1-2):225–250
doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8
Vera S, Sauma E (2015) Does a carbon tax make sense in countries with still a high potential for energy efficiency? Comparison between the reducing-emissions effects of carbon tax and energy efficiency measures in the Chilean case. Energy 88:478–488
doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.067
Wu W, Li X, Lu Z, Gozgor G, Wu K (2022) Energy subsidies and carbon emission efficiency in Chinese regions: the role of the FDI competition in local governments. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 17(1):2094035
doi: 10.1080/15567249.2022.2094035
Zahan I, Chuanmin S (2021) Towards a green economic policy framework in China: role of green investment in fostering clean energy consumption and environmental sustainability. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:43618–43628
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13041-2