Traditional ecological knowledge and non-food uses of stingless bee honey in Kenya's last pocket of tropical rainforest.
Indigenous knowledge
Kakamega forest
Meliponini
Traditional medicine
Journal
Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine
ISSN: 1746-4269
Titre abrégé: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245794
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Sep 2023
28 Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
24
05
2023
accepted:
13
09
2023
medline:
2
10
2023
pubmed:
29
9
2023
entrez:
28
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Stingless bee honey (SBH) is a natural remedy and therapeutic agent traditionally used by local communities across the (sub-)tropics. Forest SBH represents a prime non-timber forest product (NTFP) with a potential to revitalize indigenous foodways and to generate income in rural areas, yet it is also used in a variety of non-food contexts that are poorly documented in sub-Saharan Africa and that collectively represent a significant part of the local traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) passed on across generations. Documenting TEK of local communities in African tropical forests facing global change is a pressing issue to recognize the value of their insights, to evaluate their sustainability, to determine how they contribute to enhancing conservation efforts, and how TEK generally contributes to the well-being of both the natural environment and the communities that rely on it. This is particularly important to achieve in Kenya's only tropical rainforest at Kakamega where SBH production and non-food uses have evolved and diversified to a remarkable extent. We used ethnographic techniques and methods, including semi-structured questionnaires and recorded interviews. We used snowball sampling, a non-probability sampling method where new interviewees were recruited by other respondents, to collectively form a sample consisting of 36 interviewees (including only one woman). Our results indicate that local communities in Kakamega were able to discriminate between six different and scientifically recognized stingless bee species, and they provided detailed accounts on the species-specific non-food uses of these SBH. Collectively, we recorded an array of 26 different non-food uses that are all passed on orally across generations in the Kakamega community. Our results uncover the vast and hitherto unexpected diversity of TEK associated with SBH and pave the way for a systematic survey of SBH and their non-food uses across a network of communities in different environments and with different cultural backgrounds in the Afrotropics. This, along with parallel and more in-depth investigations into honey chemistry, will help develop a comprehensive understanding of SBH, offering insights into holistic ecosystem management, resilience and adaptation while in the mid- to long-term promoting cross-cultural exchanges and pathways for the revitalization of cultural practices and traditions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Stingless bee honey (SBH) is a natural remedy and therapeutic agent traditionally used by local communities across the (sub-)tropics. Forest SBH represents a prime non-timber forest product (NTFP) with a potential to revitalize indigenous foodways and to generate income in rural areas, yet it is also used in a variety of non-food contexts that are poorly documented in sub-Saharan Africa and that collectively represent a significant part of the local traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) passed on across generations. Documenting TEK of local communities in African tropical forests facing global change is a pressing issue to recognize the value of their insights, to evaluate their sustainability, to determine how they contribute to enhancing conservation efforts, and how TEK generally contributes to the well-being of both the natural environment and the communities that rely on it. This is particularly important to achieve in Kenya's only tropical rainforest at Kakamega where SBH production and non-food uses have evolved and diversified to a remarkable extent.
METHODS
METHODS
We used ethnographic techniques and methods, including semi-structured questionnaires and recorded interviews. We used snowball sampling, a non-probability sampling method where new interviewees were recruited by other respondents, to collectively form a sample consisting of 36 interviewees (including only one woman).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Our results indicate that local communities in Kakamega were able to discriminate between six different and scientifically recognized stingless bee species, and they provided detailed accounts on the species-specific non-food uses of these SBH. Collectively, we recorded an array of 26 different non-food uses that are all passed on orally across generations in the Kakamega community.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our results uncover the vast and hitherto unexpected diversity of TEK associated with SBH and pave the way for a systematic survey of SBH and their non-food uses across a network of communities in different environments and with different cultural backgrounds in the Afrotropics. This, along with parallel and more in-depth investigations into honey chemistry, will help develop a comprehensive understanding of SBH, offering insights into holistic ecosystem management, resilience and adaptation while in the mid- to long-term promoting cross-cultural exchanges and pathways for the revitalization of cultural practices and traditions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37770915
doi: 10.1186/s13002-023-00614-3
pii: 10.1186/s13002-023-00614-3
pmc: PMC10537491
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
42Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Engel K. The elusive promise of indigenous development: rights, culture, strategy, vol. 44. Duke University Press; 2010.
doi: 10.1515/9780822392965
Lowore J, Meaton J, Wood A. African forest honey: an overlooked NTFP with potential to support livelihoods and forests. Environ Manag. 2018;62:15–28.
doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1015-8
Garnett S, et al. A spatial overview of the global importance of indigenous lands for conservation. Nat Sustain. 2018;1:369–74.
doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6
Fernández-Llamazares Á, et al. Scientists’ warning to humanity on threats to indigenous and local knowledge systems. J Ethnobiol. 2021;41:144–69.
doi: 10.2993/0278-0771-41.2.144
Rosales GRO. Medicinal uses of Melipona beecheii honey, by the Ancient Maya. In: Vit P, Pedro SRM, Roubik D, editors. Pot-honey. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 229–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4960-7_15 .
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4960-7_15
Costa-Neto EM. Entomotherapy, or the medicinal use of insects. J Ethnobiol. 2005;25:93–114.
doi: 10.2993/0278-0771_2005_25_93_eotmuo_2.0.co_2
Vit P, Pedro SRM, Roubik D, editors. Pot-honey: a legacy of stingless bees. New York: Springer; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4960-7 .
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4960-7
Crittenden A. The importance of honey consumption in human evolution. Food Foodways. 2011;19:257–73.
doi: 10.1080/07409710.2011.630618
Michener CD. The bees of the world. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2007.
doi: 10.56021/9780801885730
Pimentel TC, et al. Stingless bee honey: an overview of health benefits and main market challenges. J Food Biochem. 2022;46:e13883.
doi: 10.1111/jfbc.13883
pubmed: 34338341
Ayala R, Gonzalez VH, Engel MS. Mexican stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae): diversity, distribution, and indigenous knowledge. In: Vit P, Pedro SRM, Roubik D, editors. Pot-honey. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 135–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4960-7_9 .
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4960-7_9
Mduda CA, Hussein JM, Muruke MH. Traditional knowledge and uses of stingless bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini) in Tanzania. Int J Trop Insect Sci. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-023-01018-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s42690-023-01018-2
Kiatoko N, Raina SK, van Langevelde F. A vertical compartmented hive design effective to reduce post-harvest colony loss in Afrotropical stingless bee species (Apidae: Meliponinae). Int J Dev Res. 2016;6:9026–34.
Nkoba K, Raina SK, Muli E, Mithöfer K, Mueke J. Species richness and nest dispersion of some tropical meliponine bees (Apidae: Meliponinae) in six habitat types in the Kakamega forest, western Kenya. Int J Trop Insect Sci. 2012;32:194–202.
doi: 10.1017/S1742758412000355
Nyang’au P, et al. Effect of participation in commercial production of medicinal plants through community-based conservation groups on farm income at Kakamega Forest, Kenya. J Sustain For. 2020;39:543–62.
doi: 10.1080/10549811.2019.1689145
Kenya’s indigenous forests: status, management and conservation (IUCN, 1995).
Macharia JK. Status and the potential of stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponinae) for forest conservation and income generation: a case study of Kakamega forest (2008).
Sadler GR, Lee H-C, Lim RS-H, Fullerton J. Research article: recruitment of hard-to-reach population subgroups via adaptations of the snowball sampling strategy: hard-to-reach populations. Nurs Health Sci. 2010;12:369–74.
doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2010.00541.x
pubmed: 20727089
pmcid: 3222300
International Society of Ethnobiology (2006). International Society of Ethnobiology Code of Ethics (with 2008 additions) https://www.ethnobiology.net/code-of-ethics/ .
Vit P, Vargas O, Lpez T, Valle F. Meliponini biodiversity and medicinal uses of pot-honey from El Oro province in Ecuador. Emir J Food Agric. 2015;27:502.
doi: 10.9755/ejfa.2015.04.079
Reyes-González A, Camou-Guerrero A, Reyes-Salas O, Argueta A, Casas A. Diversity, local knowledge and use of stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini) in the municipality of Nocupétaro, Michoacan, Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10:47.
doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-10-47
pubmed: 24903644
pmcid: 4061457
Abd Jalil MA, Kasmuri AR, Hadi H. Stingless bee honey, the natural wound healer: a review. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2017;30:66–75.
doi: 10.1159/000458416
pubmed: 28291965
Muya, et al. Impact of sociocultural factors on adoption of modern technologies in beekeeping projects among women groups in Kajiado County-Kenya. Int J Innov Educ Res. 2018;4:55–64.
Lokossou SC, Yedomonhan H, Tossou GM, Tchobo FP. Utilisations thérapeutiques du miel par les populations locales du Bénin. Soz Praventivmed. 2017;15:339–45.
Bhatta C, Gonzalez VH, Smith D. Traditional uses and relative cultural importance of Tetragonula iridipennis (Smith) (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) in Nepal. J Melittol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.17161/jom.vi97.13620 .
doi: 10.17161/jom.vi97.13620
Chemurot M, et al. Stingless beekeeping in Uganda: an industry in its infancy. Afr Entomol. 2021;29:165–72.
doi: 10.4001/003.029.0165
Byarugaba D. Stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of Bwindi impenetrable forest, Uganda and Abayanda indigenous knowledge. Int J Trop Insect Sci. 2004;24:117–21.
doi: 10.1079/IJT20048
Meda A, Lamien CE, Millogo J, Romito M, Nacoulma OG. Therapeutic uses of honey and honeybee larvae in central Burkina Faso. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;95:103–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.06.016
pubmed: 15374614
Medrano MC, Rosso CN. OTRA CIVILIZACIÓN DE LA MIEL: UTILIZACIÓN DE MIEL EN GRUPOS INDÍGENAS GUAYCURÚES A PARTIR DE LA EVIDENCIA DE FUENTES JESUITAS (Siglo XVIII). Espaço Ameríndio. 2010;4:147.
doi: 10.22456/1982-6524.17362
Cortopassi-Laurino M, et al. Global meliponiculture: challenges and opportunities. Apidologie. 2006;37:275–92.
doi: 10.1051/apido:2006027
Quezada-Euán JJ, Nates-Parra G, Maués M, Roubik D, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL. The economic and cultural values of stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Meliponini) among ethnic groups of tropical America. Sociobiology. 2018;65:534.
doi: 10.13102/sociobiology.v65i4.3447
Mokaya HO, Nkoba K, Ndunda RM, Vereecken NJ. Characterization of honeys produced by sympatric species of Afrotropical stingless bees (Hymenoptera, Meliponini). Food Chem. 2022;366:130597.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130597
pubmed: 34314935
Noiset P, et al. Honey compositional convergence and the parallel domestication of social bees. Sci Rep. 2022;12:18280.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23310-w
pubmed: 36316374
pmcid: 9622900
Nordin A, Sainik NQAV, Chowdhury SR, Saim AB, Idrus RBH. Physicochemical properties of stingless bee honey from around the globe: a comprehensive review. J Food Compos Anal. 2018;73:91–102.
doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2018.06.002