Preliminary Examination of Guardian Cap Head Impact Kinematics Using Instrumented Mouthguards.

concussion helmet mouthguards student-athlete traumatic brain injury

Journal

Journal of athletic training
ISSN: 1938-162X
Titre abrégé: J Athl Train
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9301647

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Sep 2023
Historique:
medline: 22 9 2023
pubmed: 22 9 2023
entrez: 21 9 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Guardian Caps (GCs) are currently the most popular external helmet-add on designed to reduce the head impact magnitude experienced by American football players. GCs have been endorsed by influential professional organizations, however few studies evaluating the efficacy of GCs are publicly available. The objective of this study is to present preliminary on-field head kinematics data for NCAA Division I American football players using instrumented mouthguards through closely matched pre-season workouts both with and without GCs. Case Series. The study took place during the 2022 American football pre-season. 25 Male NCAA Division I student-athletes participating in American football completed some portion of the 6 workouts included in this study. Of the 25 total participants, 7 completed all 6 workouts using their instrumented mouthguards. The peak linear acceleration (PLA), peak angular acceleration (PAA) and total impacts were collected using instrumented mouthguards (iMG) during 3 pre-season workouts using traditional helmets (TRAD), and 3 with Guardian Caps used in additional to a traditional helmet (GC). The TRAD and GC values for PLA, PAA and total impacts were analyzed using ANOVAs. There was no significant difference between the collapsed mean values for the entire sample between TRAD and GC for PLA (TRAD=16.3±2.0, GC=17.2±3.3Gs; p=0.20), PAA (TRAD=992.1±209.2, GC=1029.4±261.1rad/s2; p=0.51 and the total amount of impacts (TRAD=9.3±4.7, GC=9.7±5.7; p=0.72). Similarly, no difference was observed between TRAD and GC for PLA (TRAD=16.1±1.2, GC=17.2±2.79Gs; p=0.32), PAA (TRAD=951.2±95.4, GC=1038.0±166.8rad/s2; p=0.29 and total impacts (TRAD=9.6±4.2, GC=9.7±5.04s; p=0.32) between sessions for the7 repeated players. These data suggest no difference in head kinematics data (PLA, PAA and total impacts) when GCs are worn. This study suggests GCs may not be effective in reducing the magnitude of head impacts experienced by NCAA Division I American football players.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37734732
pii: 495951
doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0136.23
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Commentaires et corrections

Type : UpdateOf

Auteurs

Kristen G Quigley (KG)

Neuromechanics Laboratory, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA.

Dustin Hopfe (D)

Neuromechanics Laboratory, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA.

Madison Fenner (M)

Neuromechanics Laboratory, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA.

Philip Pavilionis (P)

Neuromechanics Laboratory, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA.

Vincentia Owusu-Amankonah E (V)

Neuromechanics Laboratory, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA.

Arthur Islas (A)

School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, 89557, USA 2E-mail address: aislas@med.unr.edu (Arthur Islas).

Nicholas G Murray (NG)

Neuromechanics Laboratory, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA.

Classifications MeSH