Optimization of the most widely used serological tests for a harmonized diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection in domestic pigs.

Comparative study ELISA IFAT Pigs Serological diagnosis Toxoplasma gondii Western blot

Journal

Veterinary parasitology
ISSN: 1873-2550
Titre abrégé: Vet Parasitol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7602745

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 29 05 2023
revised: 05 09 2023
accepted: 07 09 2023
pubmed: 21 9 2023
medline: 21 9 2023
entrez: 20 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The intake of Toxoplasma gondii tissue cysts through raw or undercooked pork meat is one of the main infection sources for humans. Thus, surveillance is recommended to control and prevent infection in domestic pigs. However, the lack of comparative studies hampers the updating of their performance and the comparison of seroprevalence data. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and validate three in-house tests and accomplish a comparative analysis of the most widely used serological tests employed in pigs. A panel of sera from pigs experimentally infected with either oocysts or tissue cysts from type II and III isolates (n = 158) was used to develop and validate a tachyzoite-based Western blot assay. Then, this technique was used as a reference to develop and preliminary validate a lyophilized tachyzoite-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and an immunofluorescence antibody test. Next, a comparative study of the three in-house tests and three widely used commercial ELISAs (IDScreen®, PrioCHECK™ and Pigtype®) was accomplished with the abovementioned sera together with an additional serum panel of pigs experimentally infected with oocysts from the type II isolate (n = 44) and a panel of naturally infected pigs (n = 244). The results obtained by the majority of the tests were regarded as reference, and data analyses included TG-ROC calculations and agreement tests. Finally, the kinetics of anti-T. gondii IgGs from experimentally infected pigs was analyzed. Excellent sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) values (≥ 93%) and moderate to near perfect agreement (k = 0.63-0.91) were observed using sera from experimental infections without requiring further readjustment, except for PrioCHECK (100% Se, 73% Sp). However, the Se of IDScreen® (87%) and TgSALUVET WB (71%) and the Sp of PrioCHECK (72%) were slightly or notably reduced when sera from naturally infected animals were analyzed, which also influenced the kappa values (k = 0.30-0.91). Cutoff readjustments increased the Se and Sp values to equal to or above 97% for all tests, except for TgSALUVET WB, which can be used as a reference for initial validation of tests, but it is not recommended for routine diagnosis. Seroconversion was recorded from two weeks post-infection by most of the tests, with significantly higher IgG levels in sera from pigs infected with the T. gondii type III vs. type II isolate. Again, differences regarding the test employed were observed. Differences in the diagnostic performance among tests evidenced the need to harmonize serological techniques to obtain comparable and reliable results.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37729831
pii: S0304-4017(23)00155-3
doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2023.110024
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110024

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Nadia Maria Lopez-Urena, Rafael Calero-Bernal, Radu Blaga, Bretislav Koudela, Luis Miguel Ortega-Mora, Gema Alvarez-Garcia reports financial support was provided by Horizon Europe.

Auteurs

Nadia María López-Ureña (NM)

SALUVET, Animal Health Department, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain.

Rafael Calero-Bernal (R)

SALUVET, Animal Health Department, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain.

Nuria González-Fernández (N)

SALUVET, Animal Health Department, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain.

Radu Blaga (R)

Anses, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Laboratoire de Santé Animale, Maisons-Alfort, France.

Bretislav Koudela (B)

Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), University of Veterinary Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic; Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic; Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.

Luis Miguel Ortega-Mora (LM)

SALUVET, Animal Health Department, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain.

Gema Álvarez-García (G)

SALUVET, Animal Health Department, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: gemaga@ucm.es.

Classifications MeSH