Basic electronic health record (EHR) adoption in


Journal

BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 14 10 2022
accepted: 28 07 2023
medline: 18 9 2023
pubmed: 15 9 2023
entrez: 14 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The digitalization studies in public hospitals in Türkiye started with the Health Transformation Program in 2003. As digitalization was accomplished, the policymakers needed to measure hospitals' electronic health record (EHR) usage and adoptions. The ministry of health has been measuring the dissemination of meaningful usage and adoption of EHR since 2013 using Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model (EMRAM). The first published study about this analysis covered the surveys applied between 2013 and 2017. The results showed that 63.1% of all hospitals in Türkiye had at least basic EHR functions, and 36% had comprehensive EHR functions. Measuring the countrywide EHR adoption level is becoming popular in the world. This study aims to measure adoption levels of EHR in public hospitals in Türkiye, indicate the change to the previous study, and make a benchmark with other countries measuring national EHR adoption levels. The research question of this study is to reveal whether there has been a change in the adoption level of EHR in the three years since 2018 in Türkiye. Also, make a benchmark with other countries such as the US, Japan, and China in country-wide EHR adoption in 2021. In 2021, 717 public hospitals actively operating in Türkiye completed the EMRAM survey. The survey results, deals with five topics (General Stage Status, Information Technology Security, Electronic Health Record/Clinical Data Repository, Clinical Documentation, Closed-Loop Management), was reviewed by the authors. Survey data were compared according to hospital type (Specialty Hospitals, General Hospitals, Teaching and Research Hospitals) in terms of general stage status. The data obtained from the survey results were analyzed with QlikView Personal Edition. The availability and prevalence of medical information systems and EHR functions and their use were measured. We found that 33.7% of public hospitals in Türkiye have only basic EHR functions, and 66.3% have extensive EHR functions, which yields that all hospitals (100%) have at least basic EHR functions. That means remarkable progress from the previous study covering 2013 and 2017. This level also indicates that Türkiye has slightly better adoption from the US (96%) and much better than China (85.3%) and Korea (58.1%). Although there has been outstanding (50%) progress since 2017 in Turkish public hospitals, it seems there is still a long way to disseminate comprehensive EHR functions, such as closed-loop medication administration, clinical decision support systems, patient engagement, etc. Measuring the stage of EHR adoption at regular intervals and on analytical scales is an effective management tool for policymakers. The bottom-up adoption approach established for adopting and managing EHR functions in the US has also yielded successful results in Türkiye.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The digitalization studies in public hospitals in Türkiye started with the Health Transformation Program in 2003. As digitalization was accomplished, the policymakers needed to measure hospitals' electronic health record (EHR) usage and adoptions. The ministry of health has been measuring the dissemination of meaningful usage and adoption of EHR since 2013 using Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model (EMRAM). The first published study about this analysis covered the surveys applied between 2013 and 2017. The results showed that 63.1% of all hospitals in Türkiye had at least basic EHR functions, and 36% had comprehensive EHR functions. Measuring the countrywide EHR adoption level is becoming popular in the world. This study aims to measure adoption levels of EHR in public hospitals in Türkiye, indicate the change to the previous study, and make a benchmark with other countries measuring national EHR adoption levels. The research question of this study is to reveal whether there has been a change in the adoption level of EHR in the three years since 2018 in Türkiye. Also, make a benchmark with other countries such as the US, Japan, and China in country-wide EHR adoption in 2021.
METHODS METHODS
In 2021, 717 public hospitals actively operating in Türkiye completed the EMRAM survey. The survey results, deals with five topics (General Stage Status, Information Technology Security, Electronic Health Record/Clinical Data Repository, Clinical Documentation, Closed-Loop Management), was reviewed by the authors. Survey data were compared according to hospital type (Specialty Hospitals, General Hospitals, Teaching and Research Hospitals) in terms of general stage status. The data obtained from the survey results were analyzed with QlikView Personal Edition. The availability and prevalence of medical information systems and EHR functions and their use were measured.
RESULTS RESULTS
We found that 33.7% of public hospitals in Türkiye have only basic EHR functions, and 66.3% have extensive EHR functions, which yields that all hospitals (100%) have at least basic EHR functions. That means remarkable progress from the previous study covering 2013 and 2017. This level also indicates that Türkiye has slightly better adoption from the US (96%) and much better than China (85.3%) and Korea (58.1%).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Although there has been outstanding (50%) progress since 2017 in Turkish public hospitals, it seems there is still a long way to disseminate comprehensive EHR functions, such as closed-loop medication administration, clinical decision support systems, patient engagement, etc. Measuring the stage of EHR adoption at regular intervals and on analytical scales is an effective management tool for policymakers. The bottom-up adoption approach established for adopting and managing EHR functions in the US has also yielded successful results in Türkiye.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37710253
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09859-w
pii: 10.1186/s12913-023-09859-w
pmc: PMC10500820
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

987

Informations de copyright

© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Références

Int J Med Inform. 2012 Mar;81(3):196-203
pubmed: 22206619
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 May;31(5):1092-9
pubmed: 22535503
Lancet. 2014 Sep 13;384(9947):954
pubmed: 25220971
Nurs Manage. 2020 Jan;51(1):10-12
pubmed: 31880614
Life (Basel). 2020 Dec 04;10(12):
pubmed: 33291615
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Dec;34(12):2174-80
pubmed: 26561387
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Dec;17(12 Spec No.):SP117-24
pubmed: 22216770
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Nov-Dec;12(6):642-7
pubmed: 16049229
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 01;24(6):1142-1148
pubmed: 29016973
Health Policy. 2018 Nov;122(11):1232-1239
pubmed: 30193980
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Oct;77(10):657-69
pubmed: 18313352
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):984-91
pubmed: 24853066
JAMA. 2010 Oct 20;304(15):1709-10
pubmed: 20959581
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 18;23(2):e24813
pubmed: 33599615
Med Care. 2008 Dec;46(12):1267-72
pubmed: 19300317
Ann Fam Med. 2012 May-Jun;10(3):221-7
pubmed: 22585886
Int J Med Inform. 2008 May;77(5):291-304
pubmed: 17951106
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 21;20(1):967
pubmed: 33087106
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Apr 02;13:295-301
pubmed: 32308512
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Sep;33(9):1664-71
pubmed: 25104826
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Feb;83(2):113-21
pubmed: 24262068
Int J Med Inform. 2017 May;101:100-107
pubmed: 28347440
J Med Syst. 2019 Jun 11;43(7):224
pubmed: 31187293
Can Fam Physician. 2015 Oct;61(10):846-7, 850-1
pubmed: 26472786
Lancet. 2014 Jul 5;384(9937):8-9
pubmed: 24998803
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):732-7
pubmed: 21659445
Med Princ Pract. 2022;31(4):342-351
pubmed: 35584616

Auteurs

İlker Köse (İ)

Department of Computer Engineering, Alanya University, Saraybeleni St., No:7, Antalya, Turkey. ilker.kose@alanyauniversity.edu.tr.

Sinem Cece (S)

Sağlık 4.0 Company, İstanbul, Turkey.

Songül Yener (S)

Department of Healthcare Management, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Senanur Seyhan (S)

Department of Healthcare Management, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Beytiye Özge Elmas (B)

Department of Healthcare Management, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Turkey.

John Rayner (J)

HIMSS Analytics for Europe and Latin America, Leipzig, Germany.

Şuayip Birinci (Ş)

Ministry of Health, Ankara, Turkey.

Mustafa Mahir Ülgü (M)

Ministry of Health, Ankara, Turkey.

Esra Zehir (E)

Ministry of Health, Ankara, Turkey.

Berrin Gündoğdu (B)

Ministry of Health, Ankara, Turkey.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH