Surgical excision versus topical 5% 5-fluorouracil and photodynamic therapy in treatment of Bowen's disease: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Bowen's disease clinical research drug response fluorouracil general dermatology medical dermatology oncology photodynamic therapy skin cancer squamous cell carcinoma surgery therapy

Journal

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
ISSN: 1097-6787
Titre abrégé: J Am Acad Dermatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7907132

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 06 06 2023
revised: 22 08 2023
accepted: 27 08 2023
pubmed: 5 9 2023
medline: 5 9 2023
entrez: 4 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil cream, methylaminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT) and surgical excision in patients with Bowen's disease are lacking. In this multicenter noninferiority trial, patients with a histologically proven Bowen's disease of 4-40 mm were randomly assigned to excision with 5 mm margin, 5% 5-fluorouracil cream twice daily for 4 weeks, or 2 sessions of MAL-PDT with 1 week interval. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with sustained clearance at 12 months after treatment. A noninferiority margin of 22% was used. Between May 2019 and January 2021, 250 patients were randomized. The proportion of patients with sustained clearance was 97.4% (75/77) after excision, 85.7% (66/77) after 5-fluorouracil, and 82.1% (64/78) after MAL-PDT. Absolute differences were -11.7% (95% CI -18.9 to -4.5; P = .0049) for 5-fluorouracil versus excision and -15.4% (95% CI -23.1 to -7.6; P = .00078) for MAL-PDT versus excision. Both noninvasive treatments significantly more often led to good or excellent cosmetic outcome. Based on our predefined noninferiority margin of 22%, 5-fluorourcail is noninferior to excision and associated with better cosmetic outcome. For MAL-PDT noninferiority to excision cannot be concluded. Therefore, 5-fluorouracil should be preferred over excision and MAL-PDT in treatment of Bowen's disease.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil cream, methylaminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT) and surgical excision in patients with Bowen's disease are lacking.
METHODS METHODS
In this multicenter noninferiority trial, patients with a histologically proven Bowen's disease of 4-40 mm were randomly assigned to excision with 5 mm margin, 5% 5-fluorouracil cream twice daily for 4 weeks, or 2 sessions of MAL-PDT with 1 week interval. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with sustained clearance at 12 months after treatment. A noninferiority margin of 22% was used.
RESULTS RESULTS
Between May 2019 and January 2021, 250 patients were randomized. The proportion of patients with sustained clearance was 97.4% (75/77) after excision, 85.7% (66/77) after 5-fluorouracil, and 82.1% (64/78) after MAL-PDT. Absolute differences were -11.7% (95% CI -18.9 to -4.5; P = .0049) for 5-fluorouracil versus excision and -15.4% (95% CI -23.1 to -7.6; P = .00078) for MAL-PDT versus excision. Both noninvasive treatments significantly more often led to good or excellent cosmetic outcome.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Based on our predefined noninferiority margin of 22%, 5-fluorourcail is noninferior to excision and associated with better cosmetic outcome. For MAL-PDT noninferiority to excision cannot be concluded. Therefore, 5-fluorouracil should be preferred over excision and MAL-PDT in treatment of Bowen's disease.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37666424
pii: S0190-9622(23)02662-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.08.076
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

58-65

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of interest None disclosed.

Auteurs

Shima Ahmady (S)

Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: shima.ahmady@mumc.nl.

Patty J Nelemans (PJ)

Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Nicole W J Kelleners-Smeets (NWJ)

Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Aimee H M M Arits (AHMM)

Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Dermatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

Michette J M de Rooij (MJM)

Department of Dermatology, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, the Netherlands.

Janneke P H M Kessels (JPHM)

Department of Dermatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.

Brigitte A B Essers (BAB)

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Klara Mosterd (K)

Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH