Effectiveness and durability of a second COVID-19 booster against severe outcomes among older people in Norway: a population-based cohort study comparing mono- and bivalent booster doses.

Omicron SARS-CoV-2 bivalent vaccine booster dose vaccine effectiveness

Journal

International journal of epidemiology
ISSN: 1464-3685
Titre abrégé: Int J Epidemiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7802871

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 30 03 2023
accepted: 07 08 2023
medline: 23 8 2023
pubmed: 23 8 2023
entrez: 23 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Evidence on the durability of the protection of a fourth dose of a monovalent or bivalent messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccine against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among older people during the predominant Omicron period is needed. We performed a population-based cohort study in Norway covering the time from 1 July 2022 to 15 January 2023, including individuals ≥75 years of age who had received at least a third dose. Using Cox proportional hazard models on severe COVID-19-associated outcome measures and all-cause mortality, we estimated the vaccine effectiveness of mono- and bivalent vaccines, comparing fourth- to third-dose recipients (>24 weeks ago). Vaccine status was included as a time-varying covariate and models were adjusted for potential confounders. We included 408 073 individuals. A fourth dose with either monovalent or bivalent mRNA vaccine showed increased protection against COVID-19-associated mortality relative to a third dose in individuals ≥75 years of age. We estimated a protective effect for the bivalent BA.1 vaccine [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.32] relative to the bivalent BA.4-5 (aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.14-0.56) and a monovalent dose (aHR 0.34, 95% CI 0.26-0.45) 2-9 weeks after vaccination compared with recipients with a third dose >24 weeks ago. The increased protective effect waned with no added protection for the monovalent vaccine after 33 weeks compared with a third dose. Our results indicate an increased protective effect of a fourth dose against severe outcomes compared with a third dose, with decreasing effect with time since the last dose.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Evidence on the durability of the protection of a fourth dose of a monovalent or bivalent messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccine against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among older people during the predominant Omicron period is needed.
METHODS METHODS
We performed a population-based cohort study in Norway covering the time from 1 July 2022 to 15 January 2023, including individuals ≥75 years of age who had received at least a third dose. Using Cox proportional hazard models on severe COVID-19-associated outcome measures and all-cause mortality, we estimated the vaccine effectiveness of mono- and bivalent vaccines, comparing fourth- to third-dose recipients (>24 weeks ago). Vaccine status was included as a time-varying covariate and models were adjusted for potential confounders.
RESULTS RESULTS
We included 408 073 individuals. A fourth dose with either monovalent or bivalent mRNA vaccine showed increased protection against COVID-19-associated mortality relative to a third dose in individuals ≥75 years of age. We estimated a protective effect for the bivalent BA.1 vaccine [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.32] relative to the bivalent BA.4-5 (aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.14-0.56) and a monovalent dose (aHR 0.34, 95% CI 0.26-0.45) 2-9 weeks after vaccination compared with recipients with a third dose >24 weeks ago. The increased protective effect waned with no added protection for the monovalent vaccine after 33 weeks compared with a third dose.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our results indicate an increased protective effect of a fourth dose against severe outcomes compared with a third dose, with decreasing effect with time since the last dose.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37608733
pii: 7248370
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyad114
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.

Auteurs

Melanie Stecher (M)

Department of Infection Control and Vaccines, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
ECDC Fellowship Programme, Field Epidemiology path (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden.

Anja Bråthen Kristoffersen (AB)

Department of Method Development and Analytics, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Kristian Lie (K)

Department of Infection Control and Vaccines, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Svein Rune Andersen (SR)

Department of Infection Control and Vaccines, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Hinta Meijerink (H)

Department of Infection Control and Vaccines, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Jostein Starrfelt (J)

Department of Infection Control and Preparedness, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Classifications MeSH