Comparative study of pre- and postauricular flaps for external auditory canal defect reconstruction.

Ear reconstruction External auditory canal defect Postauricular revolving door flap Postoncologic Preauricular flap

Journal

JPRAS open
ISSN: 2352-5878
Titre abrégé: JPRAS Open
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101680420

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 26 04 2023
accepted: 18 06 2023
medline: 9 8 2023
pubmed: 9 8 2023
entrez: 9 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Malignancies involving the external auditory canal deserve critical evaluation due to this area's aesthetic and functional importance. Flaps can be very useful for the restoration of the external auditory canal. A variety of flaps available for the surgical treatment of external acoustic meatus defects exist, depending on the precise location and size. Our study aimed to compare aesthetic and functional results in the postoncological reconstruction of external auditory canal defects using a preauricular flap and postauricular revolving door flap. Sixteen patients treated at our plastic surgery unit for defects involving the external auditory canal between January 2014 and December 2020 were included in the study. All defects were the result of a primary or secondary skin cancer excision. Patients were divided into two groups, one receiving the preauricular flap technique and the other the postauricular revolving door flap technique. Three separate visual analog scales reported excellent scores for the two procedures, though the postauricular revolving door flap had slightly better results. Both preauricular flap and postauricular revolving door flap reconstructive techniques showed good options for external auditory canal reconstruction in postexcision skin cancer patients. From an aesthetic point of view, the revolving door flap appeared to be a more elegant surgical approach in this type of reconstruction because the scar was hidden in the postauricular sulcus. Reconstruction with a postauricular revolving door flap allowed for a more natural movement with no external pedicle. IV.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Malignancies involving the external auditory canal deserve critical evaluation due to this area's aesthetic and functional importance. Flaps can be very useful for the restoration of the external auditory canal. A variety of flaps available for the surgical treatment of external acoustic meatus defects exist, depending on the precise location and size.
Objectives UNASSIGNED
Our study aimed to compare aesthetic and functional results in the postoncological reconstruction of external auditory canal defects using a preauricular flap and postauricular revolving door flap.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Sixteen patients treated at our plastic surgery unit for defects involving the external auditory canal between January 2014 and December 2020 were included in the study. All defects were the result of a primary or secondary skin cancer excision. Patients were divided into two groups, one receiving the preauricular flap technique and the other the postauricular revolving door flap technique.
Results UNASSIGNED
Three separate visual analog scales reported excellent scores for the two procedures, though the postauricular revolving door flap had slightly better results. Both preauricular flap and postauricular revolving door flap reconstructive techniques showed good options for external auditory canal reconstruction in postexcision skin cancer patients. From an aesthetic point of view, the revolving door flap appeared to be a more elegant surgical approach in this type of reconstruction because the scar was hidden in the postauricular sulcus.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Reconstruction with a postauricular revolving door flap allowed for a more natural movement with no external pedicle.
Evidence-Based Medicine EBM Level UNASSIGNED
IV.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37554519
doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.06.005
pii: S2352-5878(23)00026-8
pmc: PMC10404484
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

121-129

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

Facial Plast Surg. 2013 Oct;29(5):384-8
pubmed: 24037931
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Jul;62(7):876-83
pubmed: 18490209
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1990 Sep;99(9 Pt 1):714-21
pubmed: 2396807
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Jun;81(3):595-611
pubmed: 33994565
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2008 Oct;53(5):389-98
pubmed: 17961898
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Jul;128(7):834-7
pubmed: 12117346
Br J Plast Surg. 1981 Jul;34(3):295-8
pubmed: 7272564
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992 May;26(5 Pt 1):720-6
pubmed: 1583171
Br J Plast Surg. 2002 Jan;55(1):66-8
pubmed: 11783972
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Feb;63(2):e155-6
pubmed: 19278910
Dermatol Surg. 2014 Sep;40 Suppl 9:S86-95
pubmed: 25158880
BMJ. 2007 Feb 17;334(7589):366-8
pubmed: 17303887
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61 Suppl 1:S44-51
pubmed: 17962091
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 May;74(5):1101-1160
pubmed: 33214120
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Oct;126(4):1213-1221
pubmed: 20885243
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Feb;101(2):538-9
pubmed: 9462794
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Apr;62(4):457-61
pubmed: 18218349
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 May;66(5):780-4
pubmed: 21875759
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1996 Oct;29(5):827-52
pubmed: 8893219
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006 Jul;20(6):698-701
pubmed: 16836498
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2004;38(3):177-82
pubmed: 15259678
Br J Plast Surg. 1972 Oct;25(4):399-403
pubmed: 4567027
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2008 Aug;33(5):647-50
pubmed: 18477007

Auteurs

Fabrizio Schonauer (F)

Unit of Plastic Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy, Via Sergio Pansini, 5 - 80131 Napoli.

Giuseppe Pezone (G)

Unit of Plastic Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy, Via Sergio Pansini, 5 - 80131 Napoli.

Annachiara Cavaliere (A)

Unit of Plastic Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy, Via Sergio Pansini, 5 - 80131 Napoli.

Francesco D'Andrea (F)

Unit of Plastic Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy, Via Sergio Pansini, 5 - 80131 Napoli.

Classifications MeSH