Impact of personal protective equipment on the clarity of vision among trachoma survey graders and trichiasis surgeons in the context of COVID-19.
COVID-19
diagnostic tests/Investigation
eye (globe)
public health
Journal
BMJ open ophthalmology
ISSN: 2397-3269
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101714806
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2023
06 2023
Historique:
received:
30
01
2023
accepted:
20
05
2023
medline:
27
7
2023
pubmed:
26
7
2023
entrez:
26
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the use of personal protective equipment for those involved in trachoma survey grading and trichiasis surgery. We sought to determine which configuration of a face shield would be less likely to impact grading accuracy and ability to conduct trichiasis surgery. The research also included assessment of comfort, ease of cleaning and robustness. There were three research phases. In phase 1, assessment of four potential face shield configurations was undertaken with principal trachoma graders and trichiasis surgeon trainers to decide which two options should undergo further testing. In phase 2, clarity of vision and comfort (in a classroom environment) of the two configurations were assessed compared with no face shield (control), while grading trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF). The second phase also included the assessment of impact of the configurations while performing trichiasis surgery using a training model. In phase 3, face shield ease of use was evaluated during routine surgical programmes. In phase 2, 124 trachoma graders and 28 trichiasis surgeons evaluated the 2 face shield configurations selected in phase 1. TF agreement was high (kappa=0.83 and 0.82) for both configurations compared with not wearing a face shield. Comfort was reported as good by 51% and 32% of graders using the two configurations. Trichiasis skill scores were similar for both configurations. The face shield configuration that includes a cut-out for mounting the 2.5× magnifying loupes does not appear to impact the ability or comfort of trachoma graders or trichiasis surgeons to carry out their work.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/AIMS
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the use of personal protective equipment for those involved in trachoma survey grading and trichiasis surgery. We sought to determine which configuration of a face shield would be less likely to impact grading accuracy and ability to conduct trichiasis surgery. The research also included assessment of comfort, ease of cleaning and robustness.
METHODS
There were three research phases. In phase 1, assessment of four potential face shield configurations was undertaken with principal trachoma graders and trichiasis surgeon trainers to decide which two options should undergo further testing. In phase 2, clarity of vision and comfort (in a classroom environment) of the two configurations were assessed compared with no face shield (control), while grading trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF). The second phase also included the assessment of impact of the configurations while performing trichiasis surgery using a training model. In phase 3, face shield ease of use was evaluated during routine surgical programmes.
RESULTS
In phase 2, 124 trachoma graders and 28 trichiasis surgeons evaluated the 2 face shield configurations selected in phase 1. TF agreement was high (kappa=0.83 and 0.82) for both configurations compared with not wearing a face shield. Comfort was reported as good by 51% and 32% of graders using the two configurations. Trichiasis skill scores were similar for both configurations.
CONCLUSION
The face shield configuration that includes a cut-out for mounting the 2.5× magnifying loupes does not appear to impact the ability or comfort of trachoma graders or trichiasis surgeons to carry out their work.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37493675
pii: bmjophth-2023-001255
doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001255
pmc: PMC10255175
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Eye Vis (Lond). 2016 Nov 10;3:29
pubmed: 27844022
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022 May 26;8(1):32
pubmed: 35618795
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Dec;120(7 Suppl 2):49S-56S
pubmed: 18090728
Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct;102(10):1324-1327
pubmed: 29907634
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2015;22(3):214-25
pubmed: 26158580
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Dec;103(6):2481-2487
pubmed: 33025878
Community Eye Health. 2014;27(87):58
pubmed: 25918472
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Dec;5(12):e1221-e1234
pubmed: 29032195
Bull World Health Organ. 1987;65(4):477-83
pubmed: 3500800
Community Eye Health. 2017;30(97):14
pubmed: 28603395