Isolation, Characterization, and Comparative Genomics of the Novel Potential Probiotics from Canine Feces.
Limosilactobacillus fermentum
Pediococcus pentosaceus
canine
lactic acid bacteria
probiotics
Journal
Food science of animal resources
ISSN: 2636-0780
Titre abrégé: Food Sci Anim Resour
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101742126
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
26
04
2023
revised:
31
05
2023
accepted:
12
06
2023
medline:
24
7
2023
pubmed:
24
7
2023
entrez:
24
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are commonly used as probiotics; however, not all LAB strains have the same beneficial effects. To successfully use LAB as probiotics in canines, LAB species should originate from the canine intestinal tract as they display host specificity. The objective of this study was to investigate the phenotypic and genomic traits of potential probiotic LAB isolated from canine fecal samples. Twenty LAB samples were evaluated for their potential probiotic characteristics including resistance to low pH, bile salts, hydrophobicity, auto-aggregation, co-aggregation, adhesion to epithelia or mucosa, and production of inhibitory compounds. Additionally, we evaluated their safety and other beneficial effects on canine health, such as DPPH free radical scavenging, and β-galactosidase. Four strains demonstrated potential probiotic characteristics and were selected:
Identifiants
pubmed: 37484003
doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2023.e28
pii: kosfa-43-4-685
pmc: PMC10359844
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
685-702Informations de copyright
© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Références
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004 Jul 1;236(1):7-12
pubmed: 15212784
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jul 24;11:1662
pubmed: 32793153
Infect Immun. 2004 Apr;72(4):2160-9
pubmed: 15039339
Annu Rev Nutr. 1984;4:521-62
pubmed: 6380542
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2017 Sep;9(3):262-277
pubmed: 28188477
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Sep;55(9):2356-9
pubmed: 16348016
Science. 2008 Dec 19;322(5909):1843-5
pubmed: 19095942
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jul;35(Web Server issue):W52-7
pubmed: 17537822
Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2075:285-294
pubmed: 31584170
Genomics. 2015 Dec;106(6):404-11
pubmed: 26212213
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 14;13(2):e0192021
pubmed: 29444150
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8;44(W1):W16-21
pubmed: 27141966
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Jan;65(1):351-4
pubmed: 9872808
Bioinformatics. 2014 Jul 15;30(14):2068-9
pubmed: 24642063
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39333
pubmed: 22720094
Anaerobe. 2010 Aug;16(4):321-6
pubmed: 20304081
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2004;38(5):423-7
pubmed: 15059215
Curr Issues Intest Microbiol. 2006 Sep;7(2):73-89
pubmed: 16875422
J Vet Intern Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):1195-208
pubmed: 22092607
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003 Jul;10(4):643-6
pubmed: 12853398
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006 Oct;43(4):550-7
pubmed: 17033538
J Comput Biol. 2012 May;19(5):455-77
pubmed: 22506599
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jul 2;46(W1):W278-W281
pubmed: 29788290
Bioinformatics. 2013 Apr 15;29(8):1072-5
pubmed: 23422339
Exp Mol Med. 2019 Aug 13;51(8):1-14
pubmed: 31409765
Genomics. 2021 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):861-873
pubmed: 33096257
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 28;8(10):e77302
pubmed: 24204795
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014 Oct;12(10):1221-36
pubmed: 25199988
Dig Liver Dis. 2006 Dec;38 Suppl 2:S261-5
pubmed: 17259087